RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has generated concern about contagion, especially among healthcare workers who are on the front line. OBJECTIVE: To design and analyse the evidence of content validity, internal structure and reliability of a measure of concern about the spread of COVID-19 among Peruvian healthcare workers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quantitative study and instrumental design. The scale was administered to 321 health science professionals (78 males and 243 females), whose ages ranged from 22 to 64 years (38.12⯱â¯9.61). RESULTS: Aiken's V-coefficient values were statistically significant. An exploratory factor analysis was performed which indicated the existence of a single factor, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a satisfactory six-factor model. The CFA solution obtained adequate fit indices (RMSEAâ¯=â¯0.079; Pâ¯=â¯.05; TLIâ¯=â¯0.967; IFCâ¯=â¯0.980; GFIâ¯=â¯0.971, and AGFIâ¯=â¯0.931), and showed good internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient (αâ¯=â¯0.865; CI 95%, 0.83-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The scale of concern for COVID-19 infection is a valid and reliable brief measure that can be used for research and professional purposes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peru/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , SARS-CoV-2 , Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
Introducción: La pandemia mundial producida por el SARS-CoV-2 ha generado preocupación por el contagio, sobre todo en el personal de salud que está en primera línea. Objetivo: Diseñar y analizar las evidencias de validez de contenido, estructura interna y confiabilidad de una medida de preocupación por el contagio de COVID-19 en personal de salud peruano. Material y métodos: Estudio cuantitativo y diseño instrumental. La escala se aplicó a 321 profesionales de ciencias de la salud (78 varones y 243 mujeres) con edades comprendidas entre los 22 y los 64 (38,12 ± 9,61) an os. Resultados: Los valores del coeficiente V de Aiken fueron estadísticamente significativos. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio, que indicó la existencia de un solo factor. El análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) confirmó un modelo satisfactorio de 6 ítems en 1 solo factor. La solución del AFC obtuvo índices de ajuste adecuados (RMSEA = 0,079; p = 0,05; TLI = 0,967; CFI = 0,980; GFI = 0,971 y AGFI = 0,931); además; mostró una buena consistencia interna según el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach (a = 0,865; IC95%, 0,83-0,89). Conclusiones: La escala de preocupación por el contagio de la COVID-19 es una medida breve válida y confiable que se puede utilizar para fines de investigación y función profesional.
A B S T R A C T Introduction: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has generated concern about contagion, especially among healthcare workers who are on the front line. Objective: To design and analyse the evidence of content validity, internal structure and reliability of a measure of concern about the spread of COVID-19 among Peruvian healthcare workers. Material and methods: Quantitative study and instrumental design. The scale was administered to 321 health science professionals (78 males and 243 females), whose ages ranged from 22 to 64 years (38.12±9.61). Results: Aiken's V-coefficient values were statistically significant. An exploratory factor analysis was performed which indicated the existence of a single factor, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a satisfactory six-factor model. The CFA solution obtained adequate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.079; p = 0.05; TLI = 0.967; IFC = 0.980; GFI = 0.971, and AGFI = 0.931), and showed good internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient (a = 0.865; CI 95%, 0.83-0.89). Conclusions: The scale of concern for COVID-19 infection is a valid and reliable brief measure that can be used for research and professional purposes.
RESUMO
Introduction: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has generated concern about contagion, especially among healthcare workers who are on the front line. Objective: To design and analyse the evidence of content validity, internal structure and reliability of a measure of concern about the spread of COVID-19 among Peruvian healthcare workers. Material and methods: Quantitative study and instrumental design. The scale was administered to 321 health science professionals (78 males and 243 females), whose ages ranged from 22 to 64 years (38.12 ± 9.61). Results: Aiken's V-coefficient values were statistically significant. An exploratory factor analysis was performed which indicated the existence of a single factor, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a satisfactory six-factor model. The CFA solution obtained adequate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.079; p = 0.05; TLI = 0.967; IFC = 0.980; GFI = 0.971, and AGFI = 0.931), and showed good internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.865; CI 95%, 0.83-0.89). Conclusions: The scale of concern for COVID-19 infection is a valid and reliable brief measure that can be used for research and professional purposes.
RESUMO
Introduction: The pandemic has caused fear, especially due to the daily disseminated news; however, there is not an instrument to measure this fear in multiple realities. Objective: To validate a scale for Latin American perception of fear and concern transmitted by the media during the pandemic. Methodology: This is an instrumental study. The survey was based on an instrument which was pre-validated in Peru and submitted to 15 experts in almost 10 countries. Subsequently, thousands of people were surveyed in 13 Latin American countries, whose answers were used for descriptive statistics for validation. Results: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) generated two re-specifications, where four items were eliminated from the original scale. With these changes, the global goodness of fit (absolute and incremental) were satisfactory (CFI = 0.978; TLI = 0.964; GFI = 0.976; AGFI = 0.949; RMSEA = 0.075 and RMR = 0.029). The first factor measures the media exaggeration (three questions); the second, the fear transmitted by the media (three questions); and the third, the fear transmitted by others different from the media (two questions). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was higher than 0.70 for the scale and its factors. Conclusion: The MED-LAT-COVID-19 scale reported a good adjustment. It has eight items in three factors, which could be measured in an isolated way, or along with other tests that assess mental health in the current pandemic context.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has generated concern about contagion, especially among healthcare workers who are on the front line. OBJECTIVE: To design and analyse the evidence of content validity, internal structure and reliability of a measure of concern about the spread of COVID-19 among Peruvian healthcare workers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quantitative study and instrumental design. The scale was administered to 321 health science professionals (78 males and 243 females), whose ages ranged from 22 to 64 years (38.12±9.61). RESULTS: Aiken's V-coefficient values were statistically significant. An exploratory factor analysis was performed which indicated the existence of a single factor, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a satisfactory six-factor model. The CFA solution obtained adequate fit indices (RMSEA=0.079; p=0.05; TLI=0.967; IFC=0.980; GFI=0.971, and AGFI=0.931), and showed good internal consistency based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α=0.865; CI 95%, 0.83-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The scale of concern for COVID-19 infection is a valid and reliable brief measure that can be used for research and professional purposes.
RESUMO
Introducción: Es importante medir en la población la percepción del impacto que han tenido las medidas adoptadas por los gobiernos ante la rápida expansión del coronavirus. Objetivo: Determinar la percepción de las medidas implementadas por el gobierno de Perú en materia de salud pública para frenar el avance de la COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio transversal, analítico y multicéntrico, para el cual se hizo una encuesta virtual en la que participaron más de 4000 personas de todo el país. Resultados: La gran mayoría estaban a favor que esta es una epidemia/pandemia grave (47 por ciento de acuerdo y 42 por ciento muy de acuerdo), sin embargo, solo el 22 por ciento, 21 por ciento, 17 por ciento y 46 por ciento que el país, el sector salud, los hospitales y los médicos, respectivamente, están preparados para enfrentarla. Las medidas más apoyadas en cuanto a migración fueron la aprobación del cierre de fronteras (68 por ciento muy de acuerdo) y no dejar entrar a quienes estuvieron en China u otros países con elevadas cifras de casos de coronavirus (60 por ciento muy de acuerdo). Asimismo, estuvieron de acuerdo que no deben celebrarse eventos masivos por un tiempo (69 por ciento muy de acuerdo), seguidos por quienes proponían declarar la salud pública en emergencia (61 por ciento muy de acuerdo) y el cierren de colegios y universidades por un tiempo (50 por ciento muy de acuerdo). Se encontraron muchas asociaciones estadísticas de estas percepciones, según sexo, edad o grado académico (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: La población estuvo de acuerdo con la mayoría de las medidas, algunas fueron más apoyadas y estuvieron asociadas a las características socioeducativas(AU)
ABSTRACT measures taken by governments in response to the fast spread of the coronavirus. Objective: Determine the perception of the public health measures implemented by the Peruvian government to stop the spread of COVID-19. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional analytical study was conducted based on a virtual survey applied to more than 4 000 people across the country. Results: The vast majority of respondents agreed that COVID-19 is a serious epidemic / pandemic (47% in agreement and 42% very much in agreement). However, only 22%, 21%, 17% and 46% thought that the country, the health sector, the hospitals and the doctors, respectively, were prepared to face it. The most widely supported migration measures were border closure (68% very much in agreement) and denying entrance to travelers returning from China or other countries with high rates of coronavirus infection (60% very much in agreement). Respondents agreed that mass gatherings should not be held for a while (69% very much in agreement), a figure followed by those proposing to declare a public health emergency (61% very much in agreement) and the closure of colleges and universities for some time (50% very much in agreement). Many statistical associations of these perceptions were found, according to sex, age or educational level (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The population supports most of the measures, those related to socioeducational characteristics receiving greater support(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , População , Epidemias , Migração Humana , COVID-19 , Governo , Percepção , Peru , Inquéritos e Questionários , EmergênciasRESUMO
Introducción: La pandemia del coronavirus ha generado que muchos estudiantes teman perder el ciclo. Objetivo: Validar una escala que mida la percepción de posibles repercusiones académicas en estudiantes universitarios en el Perú. Metodología: Se realizó un proceso de validación de un test que mide la percepción acerca de las posibles repercusiones académicas en estudiantes universitarios. La validación se realizó mediante búsqueda de literatura científica, construcción del primer bosquejo, validación del test por expertos (59 expertos: epidemiólogos, investigadores, médicos), análisis factorial exploratorio y estadístico. Resultados: Respecto a la relevancia se observa que el ítem 7 es más esencial o importante que los demás (V = 1,00; IC 95 por ciento: 0,73-0,96). El ítem 8 (M = 3,80; /= 1,152) presenta la mayor media y, la más baja, el ítem 6 (M = 3,03; DE = 1,342). La pertinencia del AFE se justifica con el índice KMO (0,85) y la prueba de Bartlett (12577,0; gl = 28; p = / 0,001) siendo aceptables y significativos. Se obtuvo un coeficiente α de Cronbach de 0,899 con un intervalo de confianza del 95 por ciento de 0,882-0,898; indicando que la consistencia del instrumento es buena. Conclusiones: Se validó una escala de factor único que mide la percepción que tienen los estudiantes universitarios acerca de las posibles repercusiones de la pandemia del coronavirus en sus estudios. Es necesario evaluar cada realidad y el instrumento puede servir como una escala base para ello(AU)
Introduction: As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, many students are worried that they may lose their academic term. Objective: Validate a scale to measure the perception of possible academic impacts among Peruvian university students. Method: A validation process was conducted of a test measuring the perception of university students about possible academic impacts. The validation was based on a scientific bibliography search, development of a preliminary overview, validation of the test by 59 experts: epidemiologists, researchers and physicians, exploratory factor analysis, and statistical analysis. Results: In terms of relevance, item 7 was found to be more essential or important than the others (V = 1.00; CI 95 percent: 0.73-0.96). Item 8 (M = 3.80; /= 1.152) exhibits the highest mean, and item 6 the lowest (M = 3.03; SD = 1.342). AFE relevance is justified by the KMO index (0.85) and Bartlett's test (12577.0; gl = 28; p = / 0.001), both of which were found to be acceptable and significant. A Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.899 was obtained, with a confidence interval of 95 percent, SD 0.882-0.898, indicating a good consistency level. Conclusions: A single factor scale was validated which measures the perception of university students about the possible impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on their studies. It is necessary to evaluate each reality, and the tool may serve as a base scale for that purpose(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Estudantes , Intervalos de Confiança , Infecções por CoronavirusRESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: Para combatir al Coronavirus se requiere saber cómo afrontarlo, saber sus características más importantes y reconocer que lo más sustancial es generar medidas higiénicas básicas. Objetivo: Determinar los factores asociados al paciente empoderado en el tema de coronavirus. Métodos: Estudio transversal-analítico, con encuesta autoaplicada de carácter multicéntrico realizado en Perú entre marzo y mayo de 2020. El "paciente empoderado" se definió mediante encuesta de diez preguntas (alpha de Cronbach: 0,83); cuatro: conocimiento básico, de la gravedad y del contagio; dos: en quienes genera más daño y cuatro: medidas de protección. Se hizo la sumatoria del total de los puntajes y se cruzó versus cuatro variables socio-educativas. Resultados: De los 4167 encuestados; la mayoría sabía las medidas para evitar el contagio: el lavado de manos y estornudar adecuadamente (ambas con 65 % de personas muy de acuerdo). En el análisis multivariado, los del nivel técnico tenían un menor empoderamiento con respecto a la enfermedad (coeficiente: 0,39; IC95%: 0,15-0,98; p=0,046); además, en comparación con los encuestados que no tenían riesgo de complicaciones, los que eran del personal de salud sin riesgo (coeficiente: 1,77; IC95%: 1,01-3,09; p= 0,045) y los del personal de salud que tenían algún riesgo (coeficiente: 4,73; IC95%: 1,46-15,31; p= 0,010), fueron los más empoderados con respecto a la enfermedad; todas estas comparaciones se ajustaron por el sexo, la edad y el lugar de encuestado. Conclusiones: El personal de salud, debido a su actividad laboral, son lo más empoderados con respecto a COVID-19 y tienen mejor conocimiento en los temas de transmisión y prevención.
ABSTRACT Introduction: The fight against coronavirus infection requires knowledge about how to cope with this disease, as well as awareness of its main characteristics and the leading role played by basic hygiene actions. Objective: Determine the factors associated to patient empowerment in the context of coronavirus infection. Methods: A multicenter analytical cross-sectional study based on a self-applied survey was conducted in Peru from March to May 2020. The "empowered patient" was defined by a 10-question survey (Cronbach's alpha: 0.83); four: basic knowledge about severity and contagion; two: who are the most harshly affected, and four: protection measures. Total scores were added together and compared with four socioeducational variables. Results: Most of the 4 167 respondents were aware of the measures required to prevent contagion: hand and respiratory hygiene (both with 65% respondents very much in agreement). Multivariate analysis revealed that people with a technical educational level were less empowered about the disease (coefficient: 0.39; CI95%: 0.15-0.98; p=0.046). Comparison between respondents under no risk for complications, the health personnel (coefficient: 1.77; CI 95%: 1.01-3.09; p=0.045) and the health personnel under some sort of risk (coefficient: 4.73; CI 95%: 1.46-15.31; p=0.010) showed that the latter were the most empowered about the disease. These comparisons were adjusted for respondent sex, age and location. Conclusions: The health personnel were found to be the most highly empowered about COVID-19, due to the job they do, and showed to have the broadest knowledge about transmission and prevention topics.
RESUMO
La pandemia originó muchos cambios debido al distanciamiento social, uno de ellos es en cuanto a las clases virtuales universitarias. Por esto, el objetivo fue validar un instrumento que mida la percepción de los efectos del COVID-19 sobre la educación a distancia en estudiantes universitarios de las ciencias de la salud y otras carreras en el Perú. Se realizó un estudio instrumental y transversal. Participaron miles de estudiantes de ciencias de la salud y de otras carreras que estudiaban a distancia durante la primera ola del Coronavirus. Se diseñó y validó la encuesta sobre la percepción de que tiene de las repercusiones que causó la emergencia sanitaria sobre en la educación presencial y a distancia; además, se validó de forma exploratoria otra escala para medir la percepción de la propagación del coronavirus. El análisis arrojó alta confiabilidad y buena consistencia interna, con adecuados valores del alfa de Cronbach, para el Análisis Factorial Exploratorio (AFE) se empleó la prueba de Bartlett y el coeficiente Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin. Todos los ítems recibieron una evaluación favorable por parte de los expertos (V de Aiken > 0,70); esto con respecto de la relevancia, representatividad y claridad. Se identificó tres factores medios virtuales, su uso y la presencialidad, todos índices de saturación fueron superiores a 0,50. La encuesta demostró ser confiable y representativa, esto sobre todo por haber sido evaluada en estudiantes de los distintos departamentos peruanos; la cual puede servir para evaluar esto en diversas poblaciones semejantes(AU)
The pandemic caused many changes due to social distancing, one of them is in terms of virtual university classes. Therefore, the objective was to validate an instrument that measures the perception of the effects of COVID-19 on distance education in university students of health sciences and other careers in Peru. An instrumental and cross-sectional study was carried out. Thousands of distance learning students from health sciences and other careers participated during the first wave of the Coronavirus. The survey on the perception that it has of the repercussions caused by the health emergency on face-to-face and distance education was designed and validated; in addition, another scale was exploratory to measure the perception of the spread of the coronavirus. The analysis showed high reliability and good internal consistency, with adequate Cronbach's alpha values. For the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the Bartlett test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient were used. All the items received a favorable evaluation by the experts (Aiken's V> 0.70); this with respect to relevance, representativeness and clarity. Three virtual average factors were identified, their use and presence, all saturation indices were greater than 0.50. The survey proved to be reliable and representative, this above all because it was evaluated in students from the different Peruvian departments; which can be used to evaluate this in diverse similar populations(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Universidades , Educação a Distância , COVID-19 , Ensino , Pandemias , Distanciamento FísicoRESUMO
Introducción: El organismo se adapta al lugar donde reside, pero este tema no ha sido estudiado en la población laboral peruana. Objetivo: Determinar las variaciones fisiológicas y antropométricas en trabajadores según su residencia en tres altitudes geográficas del Perú. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación transversal analítica, con los datos fisiológicos (6 parámetros de laboratorio) y antropométricos (peso y talla) de 7500 trabajadores en 3 altitudes diferentes: Lima (nivel del mar), Arequipa (2500 m sobre el nivel del mar) y Cerro de Pasco (4300 m sobre el nivel del mar). Estas mediciones fueron estándares, realizadas por clínicas ocupacionales con certificaciones de calidad. Se obtuvo los coeficientes y valores p para las diferencias según cada altitud y ajustados por el sexo y la edad de cada participante. Resultados: Todos los parámetros fisio-antropométricos variaron según la altitud de residencia (todos los valores p fueron menores a 0,005). Los que se incrementaron a mayor altitud fueron la hemoglobina, el colesterol total y el colesterol HDL; en cambio, disminuyeron a mayor altitud el peso y la glucosa en ayunas. En los hombres aumentaron todas las variables menos en el colesterol HDL (que disminuyó significativamente) y el colesterol LDL (que no tuvo variación estadística), en comparación con las mujeres. Conclusiones: Son evidentes las variaciones en las mediciones de los trabajadores según el lugar donde residían, lo que muestra que no se debe tomar parámetros fijos para su valoración laboral. Esto debe servir a los médicos del trabajo y las autoridades, para tener en cuenta al momento de la valoración de la aptitud médica y luego para la vigilancia ocupacional(AU)
Introduction: The human body adapts to its place of residence, but this topic has not been studied in the Peruvian working population. Objective: Determine physiological and anthropometric variations in workers due to their residence in three geographic altitudes in Peru. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted of physiological data (6 laboratory parameters) and anthropometric data (weight and height) of 7 500 workers from three different altitudes: Lima (sea level), Arequipa (2 500 m above sea level) and Cerro de Pasco (4 300 m above sea level). The measures were standard and taken by occupational clinics with quality certifications. Coefficients and p values for differences between the altitudes were obtained and adjusted according to the sex and age of participants. Results: All the physio-anthropometric parameters varied with the altitude of the place of residence (all p values were under 0.005). The parameters which increased at a higher altitude were hemoglobin, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, whereas the ones which decreased at a higher altitude were weight and fasting glucose. Among men all variables increased except for HDL cholesterol (which decreased significantly) and LDL cholesterol (which did not show any statistical variation), in comparison with women. Conclusions: Variations in measurements taken from workers from different places of residence are obvious, which shows that fixed parameters should not be used for their labor assessment. This should be taken into account by occupational doctors and authorities for medical attitude assessment and occupational surveillance(AU)