RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical experience has shown that a single measure is not sufficient to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Various clinimetric tools are necessary to address the many clinical situations that can arise. METHODS: In order to develop a comprehensive measurement tool, the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology searched for the most frequent measures of disease activity applied in RA by means of a semi-systematic review of the available literature. RESULTS: We found that the most frequently reported measures of disease activity were the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, followed by patient-reported measures of pain and stiffness and many other composite indices and patient-reported outcome measures. The most frequent physician-reported sign of disease was the swollen joint count, and the most frequently self-reported feature was the increase in disease activity or flares. CONCLUSION: In this article, we present a new clinimetric tool developed based on expert consensus and on data retrieved from our search. Disease activity can be better assessed by combining various data sources, such as clinical, laboratory, and self-reported outcomes. These variables were included in our novel clinimetric tool. Key Points ⢠The goal of treatment of RA is to achieve the best possible control of inflammation, or even remission; therefore, disease management should include systematic and regular evaluation of inflammation and health status. ⢠Clinimetric tools evaluate a series of variables (e.g., symptoms, functional capacity, disease severity, quality of life, disease progression) and can reveal substantial prognostic and therapeutic differences between patients. ⢠Our clinimetric tool, which is based on a combination of data (e.g., clinical variables, laboratory results, PROMs), can play a relevant role in patient assessment and care.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo PacienteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Analyze adverse events (AE) and survival associated with biologic therapies (BT) in the Biobadaguay, the Paraguayan Uruguayan registry of adverse events. METHODS: Prospective, observational study of undetermined duration. Patients on BT at initiation and controls were included. Clinical, biological and treatment variables were registered. RESULTS: A total of 826 registers were entered (650 BT and 176 controls); 70.9% were women and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the most frequent diagnosis (63.2%). The BT most often used was adalimumab and the main cause of discontinuation was loss of efficacy (42.1%). The incidence of AE of patients on BT was 143.9 (128.8-160.8) per 1000 patients/year. In the comparative study of AE related to diagnosis, juvenile idiopathic arthrosis (JIA) was associated with a higher overall number of AE (RTI = 2.3; 95%CI: 1.6-3.4; P = 4.27 ×10-6), whereas RA was associated with a higher number of serious AE (RTI = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2-4.1; P =1.17 ×10-2). On the other hand, treatment with tocilizumab was associated with a higher rate of AE (RTI = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.9-3.82; P = 3.13 ×10-8). In JIA, treatment with corticosteroids and number of previous BT was associated with a decrease in BT survival. CONCLUSION: In this first report of the Biobadaguay registry, the main cause of BT discontinuation was loss of efficacy. In terms of the diagnosis involved, RA and JIA were associated with a higher risk of AE. In this registry, variables related to a shorter survival of BT were identified.