RESUMO
Introduction: Pharmacists play a pivotal role in ensuring patients are administered safe and effective medications; however, they encounter obstacles such as elevated workloads and a scarcity of qualified professionals. Despite the prospective utility of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), in addressing pharmaceutical inquiries, their applicability in real-world cases remains unexplored. Objective: To evaluate GPT-based chatbots' accuracy in real-world drug-related inquiries, comparing their performance to licensed pharmacists. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, authors analyzed real-world drug inquiries from a Drug Information Inquiry Database. Two independent pharmacists evaluated the performance of GPT-based chatbots (GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4) against human pharmacists using accuracy, detail, and risk of harm criteria. Descriptive statistics described inquiry characteristics. Absolute proportion comparative analyses assessed accuracy, detail, and risk of harm. Stratified analyses were performed for different inquiry types. Results: Seventy inquiries were included. Most inquiries were received from physicians (41%) and pharmacists (44%). Inquiries type included dosage/administration (34.2%), drug interaction (12.8%) and pregnancy/lactation (15.7%). Majority of inquires included adults (83%) and female patients (54.3%). GPT-4 had 64.3% completely accurate responses, comparable to human pharmacists. GPT-4 and human pharmacists provided sufficiently detailed responses, with GPT-4 offering additional relevant details. Both GPT-4 and human pharmacists delivered 95% safe responses; however, GPT-4 provided proactive risk mitigation information in 70% of the instances, whereas similar information was included in 25.7% of human pharmacists' responses. Conclusion: Our study showcased GPT-4's potential in addressing drug-related inquiries accurately and safely, comparable to human pharmacists. Current GPT-4-based chatbots could support healthcare professionals and foster global health improvements.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of childhood, occurring in approximately 5% of infants. Oral propranolol at 2 to 3 mg/kg daily is recommended for systemic treatment of high-risk infantile hemangiomas. Multiple propranolol formulations exist, and propranolol overdose can occur due to improper patient counseling. Propranolol acute toxicity in the pediatric population and its management are well described in the literature. However, data are lacking on chronic propranolol overdose and how to manage it, with the awareness that abrupt discontinuation of therapeutic doses of propranolol can lead to rebound sinus tachycardia. CASE REPORT A 7-month-old girl was prescribed a therapeutic dose of propranolol (1 mg/kg/day) to treat infantile hemangioma. However, due to an administration error, the patient received approximately 8 times the recommended dose (7.6 mg/kg/day for 2 months, then increased to 15.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) and, surprisingly, remained asymptomatic. Her electrocardiogram was normal, and all routine laboratory tests were within the reference range. Propranolol was successfully tapered over 3 weeks by reducing the dose by 50% weekly until it reached the therapeutic dose. After tapering, the patient was asymptomatic, with a mild increase in hemangioma size. After 6 weeks of the therapeutic dose, the hemangioma was fading away. CONCLUSIONS This case is one of the few cases reported in the literature of high, chronic propranolol overdose in pediatric patients. The patient remained asymptomatic, and the overdose was successfully managed with gradual tapering over several weeks. This case report can serve as a guide in managing subsequent cases.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas, Hemangioma Capilar, Hemangioma, Neoplasias Cutâneas, Lactente, Feminino, Humanos, Criança, Propranolol/efeitos adversos, Resultado do Tratamento, Administração Oral, Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico, Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos, Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although patients frequently use patient information leaflets (PILs) to obtain information about medicine, their confidence in using it may be diminished after reading it. This study aimed to assess the public perception of PIL's quality and the perceived impact of its use on medication adherence. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study of 1,138 adult individuals in Saudi Arabia, April-May 2020, was conducted via Survey Monkey using an anonymous validated e-questionnaire. Data were collected on personal characteristics, PIL readership and preferences, perception towards PIL quality and impact of its use on taking medication, and reasons for not reading PIL. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of reading PIL. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Nearly all participants (91.1%) reported reading PIL. The more read PIL's sections were directions of use (52.7%) and side effects (30.3%). Female gender (OR = 5.64, 95%CI: 3.53,9.02), age over 40 years (OR = 2.80, 95%CI: 1.69,4.64), and secondary education or more (OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.06,2.85) were the significant predictors of reading PIL. The majority of PIL readers reported their preference for verbal information (65.8%), hard copy presentation (77%), adding graphics (71.1%), and concise content of PIL (68.8%). In addition, most participants reported PIL always/usually adds to their knowledge of medicines (70.6%) and said that PIL reading positively impacted their medication adherence (64.9%). For only 8.8%, PIL reading negatively impacted their adherence, primarily because of reading information on medicine's side effects and complications (74.4%). More than one-half of participants perceived the PIL quality as good/excellent in terms of; font size (51.3%), language comprehensiveness (64.9%), paper quality (68.0%), and general appearance (64.9%). Getting sufficient information from doctors and pharmacists was the main reason for not reading the PIL (59.2%). Most participants (92.5%) agreed on standardizing how information is displayed in the PIL among all PILs of all companies. CONCLUSION: PIL is read by nearly all the study sample, especially females, older, and educated subjects. It was perceived as beneficial in upgrading medication adherence. Effective designing of PILs should focus on patients' literacy level and age. Standardization of the PIL structure in all pharmaceutical companies is recommended.
