RESUMO
Hemos planteado el presente trabajo, teniendo en cuenta los siguientes aspectos: describir las características epidemiológicas y demográficas en la población estudiada y además caracterizar especialmente los factores higiénicos, sanitarios y culturales que por su heterogeneidad, tuvieron influencia en la capacidad de infección por el Helicobacter Pylori
Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Helicobacter pylori/classificação , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Qualidade de Vida , Classe Social , Indicadores Econômicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Escolaridade , DemografiaRESUMO
Hemos planteado el presente trabajo, teniendo en cuenta los siguientes aspectos: describir las características epidemiológicas y demográficas en la población estudiada y además caracterizar especialmente los factores higiénicos, sanitarios y culturales que por su heterogeneidad, tuvieron influencia en la capacidad de infección por el Helicobacter Pylori
Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Demografia , Escolaridade , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Helicobacter pylori , Indicadores Econômicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Classe SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days' therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.
Assuntos
Antiulcerosos/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Omeprazol/farmacologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Sulfóxidos/farmacologia , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pantoprazol , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.(AU)
Assuntos
Estudo Comparativo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Omeprazol/farmacologia , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Bombas de Próton/antagonistas & inibidores , Sulfóxidos/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo , Determinação da Acidez Gástrica , Distribuição Aleatória , Análise de Variância , Manometria , Sulfóxidos/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then [quot ]wash out[quot ] for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acid-supressing capacity of omeprazole (OZ) 20 mg tablets vs pantoprazole (PZ) 20 and 40 mg tablets, in healthy volunteers, with 24-h intragastric pH-metry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open, randomized, cross-over trial in 10 healthy volunteers; on days 0.8 and 22, 24-h intragastric pH-metry. Day 0, basal, thereafter 7 days with OZ or PZ 20 mg/day; day 8, pH-metry, then "wash out" for 7 days and thereafter 7 more days' therapy with PZ or OZ. On day 22 a 24-h intragastric pH control was performed again. In the last treatment stage, all of them were administered pantoprazole 40 mg/day for 8 days again with a 24-h pH recording at the end. RESULTS: 24-h pH-metry expressed as the time (hours) in which the pH was < or = 4 and the values as mean +/- standard deviation. BASAL 22.12 +/- 1.54, POST-OZ 9.78 +/- 6.72, POST-PZ 20 15.65 +/- 5.65, POST-PZ 40 8.57 +/- 5.93. Statistical evaluation with two way repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.0001. Newman Keuls post-hoc test: (1) vs (2) p < 0.003; (1) vs (3) p < 0.03; (2) vs (4) 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results it might be stated that both proton pump inhibitors have acid-supressing capacity and omeprazole in equal dosis is more effective than pantoprazole as acid-supressor, with statistically significative differences. There was no difference between 20 mg omeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Ácido Gástrico , Omeprazol/farmacologia , Bombas de Próton/antagonistas & inibidores , Sulfóxidos/farmacologia , Análise de Variância , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Estudos Cross-Over , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Determinação da Acidez Gástrica , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Manometria , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Distribuição Aleatória , Sulfóxidos/administração & dosagem , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Nowadays technics for Helicobacter pylori detection in stools like culture, and PCR, are expensive and difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to evaluate ELISA test efficacy for detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools comparing this results with standarized technics like histology (Giemsa), ureasa test and UBT C 14. 26 patients were evaluated in this study, ages between 15-75 with upper gastrointestinal symptoms; all of them required gastroduodenal endoscopy, status H. Pylori was determined with methods upon mentioned. 24 hours after endoscopy H. Pylori antigens in stools with the technique Premier Platinum Htsa, Elisa were determined. The detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools accurately identified active H. Pylori infection. The performance characteristics of this non-invasive method was similar in sensibility and specificity to conventional tests (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/normas , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Nowadays technics for Helicobacter pylori detection in stools like culture, and PCR, are expensive and difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to evaluate ELISA test efficacy for detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools comparing this results with standarized technics like histology (Giemsa), ureasa test and UBT C 14. 26 patients were evaluated in this study, ages between 15-75 with upper gastrointestinal symptoms; all of them required gastroduodenal endoscopy, status H. Pylori was determined with methods upon mentioned. 24 hours after endoscopy H. Pylori antigens in stools with the technique Premier Platinum Htsa, Elisa were determined. The detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools accurately identified active H. Pylori infection. The performance characteristics of this non-invasive method was similar in sensibility and specificity to conventional tests
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígenos de Bactérias , Fezes , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Nowadays technics for Helicobacter pylori detection in stools like culture, and PCR, are expensive and difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to evaluate ELISA test efficacy for detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools comparing this results with standarized technics like histology (Giemsa), ureasa test and UBT C 14. 26 patients were evaluated in this study, ages between 15-75 with upper gastrointestinal symptoms; all of them required gastroduodenal endoscopy, status H. Pylori was determined with methods upon mentioned. 24 hours after endoscopy H. Pylori antigens in stools with the technique Premier Platinum Htsa, Elisa were determined. The detection of H. Pylori antigens in stools accurately identified active H. Pylori infection. The performance characteristics of this non-invasive method was similar in sensibility and specificity to conventional tests.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Some papers report helicobacter pylori existence in bile from surgical specimens obtained during gallbladder or bile ducts surgery. The aim of this work was search by PCR, H. Pylori presence in bile specimens from patients suffering of gallbladder stones or by bile ducts stones. Bile samples were obtained by gallbladder punction during cholecystectomy in 26 patients, 19 of them with gallbladder stones and 7 also with gallbladder stones and bile duct stones. Age ranged from 22-69 years old, median 49.6 years old. Samples were sent to specialized biomolecular laboratory to perform PCR techniques. Two of 26 patients (7.6%) had positive reaction for the presence of DNA of H. Pylori in bile samples. Our research suggest that DNA of H. Pylori can be founded in bile samples patients with gallbladders and duct stones in Argentina.