RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify reference values for handgrip strength through a literature search and compare the agreement of reference values from Brazil with others for handgrip strength in a sample of COPD patients in Brazil, as well as to determine which set of reference values is more discriminative regarding differences in clinical characteristics between individuals with low handgrip strength and normal handgrip strength. METHODS: To identify reference values for handgrip strength, a literature search was performed; a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of baseline-only data from two unrelated studies was then performed. Individuals were evaluated for handgrip strength, peripheral muscle strength, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, body composition, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and functional status. RESULTS: Of the 45 studies that were initially selected, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis, which included 99 COPD patients in Brazil (52% of whom were male with GOLD stage II-IV COPD). The prevalence of low handgrip strength varied across studies (from 9% to 55%), the set of reference values for handgrip strength in a sample of individuals in Brazil having classified 9% of the study sample as having low handgrip strength. The level of agreement between the reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil and the other sets of reference values varied from weak to excellent. The reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil showed the highest number of significantly different characteristics between individuals with low and normal handgrip strength. CONCLUSIONS: The level of agreement between national and international sets of reference values for handgrip strength varied from weak to excellent in COPD patients in Brazil. Reference values for handgrip strength with higher discriminative capacity are not necessarily those that identify more individuals as having low handgrip strength.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify reference values for handgrip strength through a literature search and compare the agreement of reference values from Brazil with others for handgrip strength in a sample of COPD patients in Brazil, as well as to determine which set of reference values is more discriminative regarding differences in clinical characteristics between individuals with low handgrip strength and normal handgrip strength. Methods: To identify reference values for handgrip strength, a literature search was performed; a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of baseline-only data from two unrelated studies was then performed. Individuals were evaluated for handgrip strength, peripheral muscle strength, respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, body composition, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and functional status. Results: Of the 45 studies that were initially selected, 9 met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis, which included 99 COPD patients in Brazil (52% of whom were male with GOLD stage II-IV COPD). The prevalence of low handgrip strength varied across studies (from 9% to 55%), the set of reference values for handgrip strength in a sample of individuals in Brazil having classified 9% of the study sample as having low handgrip strength. The level of agreement between the reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil and the other sets of reference values varied from weak to excellent. The reference values for a sample of individuals in Brazil showed the highest number of significantly different characteristics between individuals with low and normal handgrip strength. Conclusions: The level of agreement between national and international sets of reference values for handgrip strength varied from weak to excellent in COPD patients in Brazil. Reference values for handgrip strength with higher discriminative capacity are not necessarily those that identify more individuals as having low handgrip strength.

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar valores de referência de força de preensão manual por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e comparar, em pacientes com DPOC no Brasil, o nível de concordância entre valores de referência de força de preensão manual obtidos no Brasil com outros valores de referência, bem como determinar qual conjunto de valores de referência é mais discriminativo em relação a características clínicas em indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa e normal. Métodos: Para identificar valores de referência de força de preensão manual, foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise transversal retrospectiva de dados exclusivamente basais provenientes de dois estudos não relacionados. Os indivíduos foram avaliados quanto à força de preensão manual, força muscular periférica, força muscular respiratória, função pulmonar, composição corporal, capacidade de exercício, dispneia e estado funcional. Resultados: Dos 45 estudos inicialmente selecionados, 9 preencheram os critérios de inclusão na análise, que incluiu 99 pacientes com DPOC no Brasil (52% dos quais eram homens com DPOC no estágio II-IV da GOLD). A prevalência de força de preensão manual baixa variou entre os estudos (de 9% a 55%), sendo que os valores de referência de força de preensão manual em indivíduos no Brasil classificaram 9% dos pacientes com DPOC como sendo indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa. O nível de concordância entre os valores de referência para indivíduos no Brasil e os demais valores de referência variou de fraco a excelente. Os valores de referência para indivíduos no Brasil revelaram o maior número de características significativamente diferentes em indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa e normal. Conclusões: O nível de concordância entre valores de referência nacionais e internacionais de força de preensão manual variou de fraco a excelente em pacientes com DPOC no Brasil. Os valores de referência de força de preensão manual com maior capacidade discriminativa não são necessariamente aqueles que identificam mais indivíduos como sendo indivíduos com força de preensão manual baixa.

RESUMO

Muscle dysfunction is one of the main features in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Handgrip strength (HS) has been used as a representation of general muscle strength in various populations, and a few studies found correlation between HS and other measures of upper and lower limbs' muscle strength in the general population, although this was not yet studied in depth in COPD. The aims of this study were to verify if HS is cross-sectionally well correlated with upper and lower limbs' muscle strength in individuals with COPD, and to identify a new cutoff for handgrip weakness in this population. HS was assessed by a dynamometer, whereas other muscle strength assessments comprised maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the quadriceps femoris and 1-repetition maximum (1RM) of biceps and triceps brachii, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and quadriceps femoris. Additional assessments included pulmonary function and volumes, body composition and exercise capacity. Fifty individuals with COPD were studied (65 ± 7 years; FEV1 51 ± 14%pred). HS showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all 1-RM assessments (0.62

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) may be better associated with commonly used outcomes in COPD than FEV1 and may provide information on respiratory mechanics. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between MVV and clinical outcomes in COPD and to verify whether MVV predicts these outcomes better than FEV1. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving individuals with COPD. Lung function was assessed with spirometry; maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax, respectively) were assessed with manuvacuometry; and functional exercise capacity was assessed with the 6-min-walk test (6MWT). Dyspnea was assessed with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale; functional status was assessed with the modified Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ-m); and health status was assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Correlations were verified with the Spearman coefficient, and stepwise multiple linear regression models investigated the predictors of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Our study included 157 subjects: 82 males; median (interquartile range) age 66 (61-73) y; FEV1 46 (33-57) % predicted; 6MWT 86 (76-96) % predicted; PFSDQ-m total score 34 (14-57); and CAT total score 13 (7-19). Moderate correlations were found between MVV and PImax (r = 0.40), 6MWT (r = 0.50), mMRC (r = -0.56), and total scores on the PFSDQ-m (r = -0.40) and the CAT (r = -0.54). In the regression models, MVV was a predictor of almost all clinical outcomes, unlike FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: MVV correlates moderately with clinical outcomes commonly used in the evaluation of individuals with COPD, and MVV is a better predictor of respiratory muscle strength, functional exercise capacity, and patient-reported outcomes than FEV1.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Gait impairments are one of the earliest signs reported by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and cause an increased number of falls and decreased quality of life among these patients. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of three physical therapy interventions using Rhythmic Cues (RC), Swiss Ball (SB) and Dual Task (DT), with an emphasis on gait treatment (step and stride length, duration and velocity), in individuals with PD. Methods: Quasi-randomized clinical trial addressing a sample composed of 45 individuals assigned to three groups. The individuals were assessed before and after the intervention protocol using the following: Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale (HY), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Footprint analysis, Video Gait analysis, and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). The groups were homogeneous concerning age, HY and UPDRS. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20.0. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in all the variables analyzed in the RC and SB groups when compared in the pre- and post-intervention. With the exception of the TUG variable, the DT group presented statistically significant differences in all the remaining variables. Conclusion: The three interventions were effective for the outcomes under study, but the SB group presented the greatest magnitude of change (effect size), while the RC group presented the greatest improvement in the temporal gait variables (duration and velocity) and TUG.

Resumo Introdução: As alterações na marcha são um dos sinais relatados mais precocemente pelos pacientes com doença de Parkinson (DP), ocasionando aumento do número de quedas e redução da qualidade de vida desses indivíduos. Objetivo: Comparar a efetividade de três intervenções fisioterapêuticas utilizando Pistas Rítmicas (RC), Bola Suíça (SB) e Dupla Tarefa (DT) com ênfase no tratamento da marcha (tamanho do passo, da passada, tempo e velocidade) em indivíduos com DP. Métodos: Foi realizado estudo do tipo ensaio clínico quase randomizado, com casuística composta por 45 indivíduos, divididos nos três grupos. Os indivíduos foram avaliados antes e após o protocolo de intervenção pelos seguintes instrumentos: Escala de Hoehn & Yahr Modificada (HY), Escala Unificada de Avaliação da doença de Parkinson (UPDRS), Teste de impressão plantar (footprint), Análise de marcha por vídeo e Teste Timed Up and Go (TUG). Os grupos eram homogêneos em relação à idade, HY e UPDRS. Para análise estatística foi utilizado o programa SPSS 20. Resultados: Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes em todas as variáveis analisadas no RC e SB quando comparados os valores pré e pós intervenção. No DT, as variáveis também apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes, exceto o TUG. Conclusão: As três intervenções foram efetivas para os desfechos estudados, porém o grupo que apresentou maior magnitude de mudança (tamanho do efeito) foi o SB, enquanto o RC apresentou maior porcentagem de melhora nas variáveis temporais da marcha (tempo e velocidade), bem como no TUG.

Assuntos