RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: The Modena bleeding score is a categorical rating scale that allows the assessment of the surgical field in relation to bleeding during endoscopic surgery. It has recently been presented and validated in the field of endoscopic ear surgery by the present authors. The Modena bleeding score provides five grades for rating the surgical field during endoscopic procedures (from grade 1 - no bleeding to grade 5 - bleeding that prevents every surgical procedure except those dedicated to bleeding control). Objective: The aim of this study was to validate the Modena bleeding score in the setting of endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: Fifteen three-minute videos of endoscopic sinus surgery procedures (each containing three bleeding situations) were evaluated by 15 specialists, using the Modena bleeding score. Intra and inter-rater reliability were assessed, and the clinical validity of the Modena bleeding score was calculated using a referent standard. Results: The data analysis showed an intra-rater reliability ranging from 0.6336 to 0.861. The inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.676 to 0.844. The clinical validity was α = 0.70; confidence limits: 0.64 - 0.75, corresponding to substantial agreement. Conclusion: The Modena bleeding score is an effective method to score bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery. Its application in future research could facilitate the performance and efficacy assessment of surgical techniques, materials or devices aimed to bleeding control during endoscopic sinus surgery.

Resumo Introdução: O escore de sangramento de Modena é uma escala de classificação de categorias que permite a avaliação do campo cirúrgico em relação ao sangramento durante a cirurgia endoscópica. Recentemente, ele foi apresentado e validado no campo da cirurgia endoscópica otológica pelos presentes autores. O escore de sangramento de Modena fornece cinco graus para classificação do campo cirúrgico durante procedimentos endoscópicos (de grau 1 - Sem sangramento até grau 5 - Sangramento que impede todos os procedimentos cirúrgicos, exceto aqueles dedicados ao controle de sangramento). Objetivo: Validar o escore de sangramento de Modena no contexto da cirurgia endoscópica nasossinusal. Método: Foram avaliados por 15 especialista 15 vídeos de três minutos de procedimentos de cirurgia endoscópica nasossinusais (cada um com três situações de sangramento), com o uso do escore de sangramento de Modena. A confiabilidade intra e interexaminador foi avaliada e a validade clínica do escore de sangramento foi calculada com um padrão de referência. Resultados: A análise dos dados mostrou confiabilidade intraexaminador que variou de 0,6336 a 0,861. A confiabilidade interexaminador variou de 0,676 a 0,844. A validade clínica foi α = 0,70; limites de confiança: 0,64-0,75, correspondeu a concordância substancial. Conclusão: O escore de sangramento de Modena é um método eficaz para avaliar o sangramento durante a cirurgia endoscópica nasossinusal. Sua aplicação em pesquisas futuras pode facilitar o desempenho e a avaliação da eficácia de técnicas cirúrgicas, do material ou dos dispositivos destinados ao controle de sangramento durante essas cirurgias.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Modena bleeding score is a categorical rating scale that allows the assessment of the surgical field in relation to bleeding during endoscopic surgery. It has recently been presented and validated in the field of endoscopic ear surgery by the present authors. The Modena bleeding score provides five grades for rating the surgical field during endoscopic procedures (from grade 1 - no bleeding to grade 5 - bleeding that prevents every surgical procedure except those dedicated to bleeding control). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the Modena bleeding score in the setting of endoscopic sinus surgery. METHODS: Fifteen three-minute videos of endoscopic sinus surgery procedures (each containing three bleeding situations) were evaluated by 15 specialists, using the Modena bleeding score. Intra and inter-rater reliability were assessed, and the clinical validity of the Modena bleeding score was calculated using a referent standard. RESULTS: The data analysis showed an intra-rater reliability ranging from 0.6336 to 0.861. The inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.676 to 0.844. The clinical validity was α = 0.70; confidence limits: 0.64 - 0.75, corresponding to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The Modena bleeding score is an effective method to score bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery. Its application in future research could facilitate the performance and efficacy assessment of surgical techniques, materials or devices aimed to bleeding control during endoscopic sinus surgery.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The association between obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (oSDB) and arterial stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, is not well established in children. This study compared cardiovascular parameters between healthy and oSDB children and aimed to identify predictors of arterial stiffness indices in children with oSDB. Cross-sectional study realized in a tertiary hospital from June 2018 to January 2020. Forty-eight children (3 to 10 years old) with clinical diagnosis of oSDB and indication for adenotonsillectomy and 24 controls were evaluated. Cardiovascular parameters were measured non-invasively by brachial artery oscillometry with a portable device. The main arterial stiffness indices assessed were augmentation index and pulse wave velocity, both derived from the aortic pulse wave. In the oSDB group, the questionnaires Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) were applied. The oSDB group had higher values of reflection coefficient (p = 0.044) and augmentation index (p = 0.003) than the control group. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that age, female sex, reflection coefficient, and systolic volume were independent predictors of augmentation index. Higher pulse wave velocity values were associated with worse quality of life assessed by PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire. There was no association with OSA-18. The vascular and hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups.Conclusion: Children with oSDB have increased augmentation index, an independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. The early identification of subclinical cardiovascular changes reinforces the importance of treating the disease, as well as changing lifestyle habits, to prevent complications in adulthood. What is Known: • The association between oSDB and cardiovascular risk in adults is well described in the literature. • Children with oSDB, regardless of their weight or sex, have higher PWV values when compared to non-snoring children. What is New: • Children with oSDB have augmented arterial stiffness, evidenced by the increase in AIx@75, measured non-invasively by brachial artery oscillometry with a portable device. • Low quality of life and therefore a high disease burden in children with oSDB may be a risk factor for arterial stiffness.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Type I tympanoplasty is one of the first operations to be performed by ear surgeons in training and is increasingly performed using the endoscopic technique. The aim of the present study is to assess and compare the learning curve for type I tympanoplasties between a microscopically trained and endoscopic native ear surgeon. We hypothesize comparable learning curves between the two surgeons regardless of previous microscopic experience. METHODS: Retrospective analysis and comparison of the 25 first consecutive cases of type I tympanoplasty performed by a microscopically trained ear surgeon (MTES) and a native endoscopic ear surgeon (NEES). RESULTS: Mean duration of surgery in MTES and NEES groups was 54 ± 12.3 min and 55.6 ± 17.5 min, respectively. Both surgeons achieved a reduction of the surgery duration over time with statistically significant reduction from the first five cases to the last five cases in both groups. Graft intake rate was 92% after 3 months. Preoperative and postoperative PTA revealed a mean improvement of air bone gap (ABG) of 11.5 ± 7.1 dB HL in MTES group versus 9.3 ± 8.5 dB HL in NEES group, whereby the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty shows comparable results and learning curves in two beginning endoscopic ear surgeons independent of the previous microscopic experience. We recommend if available the parallel learning of both techniques.

Assuntos