RESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with no evidence of disease (NED) after metastasectomy for renal cell carcinoma are at high risk of recurrence. Pazopanib is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and other kinases that improves progression-free survival in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study to test whether pazopanib would improve disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with mRCC rendered NED after metastasectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NED after metastasectomy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once daily versus placebo for 52 weeks. The study was designed to observe an improvement in DFS from 25% to 45% with pazopanib at 3 years, corresponding to 42% reduction in the DFS event rate. RESULTS: From August 2012 to July 2017, 129 patients were enrolled. The study was unblinded after 83 DFS events (92% information). The study did not meet its primary end point. An updated analysis at 60.5-month median follow-up from random assignment (95% CI, 59.3 to 71.0) showed that the 3-year DFS was 27.4% (95% CI, 17.9 to 41.7) for pazopanib and 21.9% (95% CI, 13.3 to 36.2) for placebo. Hazard ratio (HR) for DFS was 0.90 ([95% CI, 0.60 to 1.34]; Pone-sided = .29) in favor of pazopanib. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 81.9% (95% CI, 72.7 to 92.2) for pazopanib and 91.4% (95% CI, 84.4 to 98.9) for placebo. The HR for OS was 2.55 (95% CI, 1.23 to 5.27) in favor of placebo (Ptwo-sided = .012). Health-related quality-of-life measures deteriorated in the pazopanib group during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib did not improve DFS as the primary end point compared with blinded placebo in patients with mRCC with NED after metastasectomy. In addition, there was a concerning trend favoring placebo in OS.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Indazóis , Neoplasias Renais , Metastasectomia , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Indazóis/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/farmacologia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) is a rare and aggressive variant of bladder cancer with limited data regarding epidemiology and survival. In this study, we explored clinicopathologic factors and oncologic outcomes of patients with SUC derived from Survival, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, in comparison to conventional UC (CUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: SEER database was searched for patients with invasive (≥T1) SUC or CUC using the topography codes C67.0 to C67.9 for bladder cancer and the morphologic codes 8120/8122 for CUC/SUC respectively. Demographic/clinicopathologic/treatment/survival data were extracted. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-squared tests were used for comparative analysis and Cox proportional hazards model for identifying clinical covariates associated with DSS. RESULTS: A total of 569 patients with SUC and 37,740 with CUC were identified. Overall, there was a male predominant population in both cohorts, although a higher proportion of women were noted in the SUC cohort (32 vs. 25%). Patients with SUC had significantly higher incidence of non-bladder confined disease (T3/4, 37% vs. 22%) and nodal invasion (18% vs. 12%) in comparison to those with CUC (all P < .05). Median DSS was 16 months (95% CI: 12.4-19.6) in the SUC vs. 82 months (95% CI; 75.9-88.1) in the CUC cohort. Presence of SUC histology was independently associated with shorter DSS in the multivariate analysis, when adjusted for other significant clinicopathologic factors. CONCLUSION: SUC was associated with advanced stage and shorter DSS compared to CUC. Further studies are needed to better understand biological underpinnings behind its aggressive behavior and the role of novel systemic treatments.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
The development of multiple vascular endothelial growth factor- and mammalian target of rapamycin-targeted therapies in advanced renal cell carcinoma has resulted in significant clinical benefit. However, the availability of multiple treatment options has led to a more complicated clinical decision-making process. Prognostic factors have been incorporated into the inclusion criteria for pivotal clinical trials and have thus provided some guidance regarding the selection and sequencing of therapy. Even within a given patient risk group and particular line of therapy, questions remain regarding the optimal choice of a targeted agent. The present review provides a practical, clinician-oriented assessment of pharmacologic factors that should be considered when a receptor tyrosine kinase or mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor is used to treat patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although these 2 classes of agents have different mechanisms of action, they are metabolized by similar pathways, resulting in broadly similar pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interaction profiles. To further individualize therapy and optimize clinical benefit, an enhanced understanding of the key pharmacologic features that differentiate these agents is important.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Carcinoma de Células Renais/metabolismo , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/metabolismo , Medicina de Precisão , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The ATR-CHEK1 pathway is upregulated and overactivated in Ataxia Telangiectasia (AT) cells, which lack functional ATM protein. Loss of ATM in AT confers radiosensitivity, although ATR-CHEK1 pathway overactivation compensates, leads to prolonged G(2) arrest after treatment with ionizing radiation (IR), and partially reverses the radiosensitivity. We observed similar upregulation of the ATR-CHEK1 pathway in a subset of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines with ATM loss. In the present study, we report copy number gain, amplification, or translocation of the ATR gene in 8 of 20 OSCC cell lines by FISH; whereas the CHEK1 gene showed copy number loss in 12 of 20 cell lines by FISH. Quantitative PCR showed overexpression of both ATR and CHEK1 in 7 of 11 representative OSCC cell lines. Inhibition of ATR or CHEK1 with their respective siRNAs resulted in increased sensitivity of OSCC cell lines to IR by the colony survival assay. siRNA-mediated ATR or CHEK1 knockdown led to loss of G(2) cell cycle accumulation and an increased sub-G(0) apoptotic cell population by flow cytometric analysis. In conclusion, the ATR-CHEK1 pathway is upregulated in a subset of OSCC with distal 11q loss and loss of the G(1) phase cell cycle checkpoint. The upregulated ATR-CHEK1 pathway appears to protect OSCC cells from mitotic catastrophe by enhancing the G(2) checkpoint. Knockdown of ATR and/or CHEK1 increases the sensitivity of OSCC cells to IR. These findings suggest that inhibition of the upregulated ATR-CHEK1 pathway may enhance the efficacy of ionizing radiation treatment of OSCC.