RESUMO
Risk factors that determine the severity of Covid-19 have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of coronary artery calcification (CAC) as a risk factor for death or mechanical ventilation (MV) of patients without known heart disease infected with Covid-19. We analyzed 283 consecutive in-patients with acute respiratory symptoms with chest computed tomography (chest-CT), without previous heart disease, and criteria for Covid-19 (RT-PCR positive and/or typical clinical and chest-CT findings). CAC was classified by the number of coronary segments affected as absent (0), mild (1-3), and severe calcification (more than 3). The association between CAC, CAC severity, and death or MV due to severe respiratory failure was assessed by logistic regression. The mean age was 58.7±15.7 years and 54.1% were men. Patients with CAC were older, more likely to have hypertension, and less likely to be obese. CAC was present in 75 patients (26.5%), of which 42 had a mild calcification and 33 had severe calcification, and was associated with death (OR=2.35, 95%CI: 1.01-5.48) or MV (OR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.20-6.20) adjusted for multiple confounders, with significant and increased odds ratio for the severe form of CAC (death: OR=3.70, 95%CI: 1.20-11.42; MV: OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.09-9.95). We concluded that CAC was an independent risk factor for death or MV in Covid-19 patients without previous heart disease, particularly for those with severe calcification. CAC can be easily visualized on common chest-CT, widely used in evaluation of moderate to severe Covid-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Calcificação Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Calcificação Vascular/complicações , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Risk factors that determine the severity of Covid-19 have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of coronary artery calcification (CAC) as a risk factor for death or mechanical ventilation (MV) of patients without known heart disease infected with Covid-19. We analyzed 283 consecutive in-patients with acute respiratory symptoms with chest computed tomography (chest-CT), without previous heart disease, and criteria for Covid-19 (RT-PCR positive and/or typical clinical and chest-CT findings). CAC was classified by the number of coronary segments affected as absent (0), mild (1-3), and severe calcification (more than 3). The association between CAC, CAC severity, and death or MV due to severe respiratory failure was assessed by logistic regression. The mean age was 58.7±15.7 years and 54.1% were men. Patients with CAC were older, more likely to have hypertension, and less likely to be obese. CAC was present in 75 patients (26.5%), of which 42 had a mild calcification and 33 had severe calcification, and was associated with death (OR=2.35, 95%CI: 1.01-5.48) or MV (OR=2.72, 95%CI: 1.20-6.20) adjusted for multiple confounders, with significant and increased odds ratio for the severe form of CAC (death: OR=3.70, 95%CI: 1.20-11.42; MV: OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.09-9.95). We concluded that CAC was an independent risk factor for death or MV in Covid-19 patients without previous heart disease, particularly for those with severe calcification. CAC can be easily visualized on common chest-CT, widely used in evaluation of moderate to severe Covid-19.
Assuntos
Fatores de Risco de Doenças CardíacasRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Frailty is common in nursing homes. However, few studies reported longitudinal validation for death prediction or cut-off scores with the FRAIL-NH, which is designed to be used in nursing homes. Moreover, no studies came from Latin America, where frailty is highly prevalent. Our objectives were to evaluate (1) the prevalence of frailty according to the FRAIL-NH scale, and (2) its association to and the best cut-off score for predicting death after 12 months. DESIGN: longitudinal study with 12-month follow-up. SETTING: 6 nursing homes in southwest of Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: 293 residents with 60 years old or more. METHODS: Frailty was evaluated through the FRAIL-NH scale. Logistic regression was used to estimate the associated between frailty and mortality adjusted for age and sex. ROC curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the scale for mortality prediction. RESULTS: Frailty was prevalent (47.4%) and was associated with death (odds ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18-1.48, p<0.001). The area under the curve was 0.741 (95%CI=0.68-0.79). The sensitivity and specificity of the FRAIL-NH scale according to the best value of the Youden Index was 72.9% and 66.5%, respectively, for a cut-off > 8 points. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is prevalent in nursing homes according to the FRAIL-NH and it was associated with one-year prediction of death for a cut-off > 8 points.
Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Mortalidade/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Casas de Saúde , PrevalênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Frailty is characterized by a functioning decline in multiple systems accompanied by an increase in individual's vulnerability to stressors. It appears to be higher in low and middle-income countries compared with high-income ones. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of frailty in non-institutionalized Brazilian older adults. DESIGN: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. SETTING: Cross-sectional and prospective data from Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: non-institutionalized adults aged 60 and older. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS and Web of Science, considering the studies published between March 2001 and July 2018, using a combination of the following terms and correlates: "elder" AND "frail" AND "prevalence" AND "Brazil". Two independent reviewers selected studies according to the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer (title/abstract) and by consensus. Studies with samples ≥221 subjects were considered for meta-analysis. RESULTS: 28 studies were included, while 18 had the data meta-analyzed. The majority of studies (61%) included older adults only from the Southeastern region. The number of subjects ranged from 53 to 5,532 individuals (N = 17,604) and the average age ranged from 65.6 to 85.5 years. The overall prevalence of frailty was 24%. When considering the different assessment methods, the prevalence was lower for frailty phenotype (16%) compared with other criteria (40%). Regarding sex, the prevalence of frailty was similar for women (28%) and men (25%). The prevalence of frailty was higher in older adults recruited from health care services (30%) compared to community ones (22%). CONCLUSION: In Brazil, the overall prevalence of frailty in non-institutionalized older adults is higher than observed from more developed countries. However, it may vary according to the assessment methods and settings.
Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of frailty is significant in Latin America. However, no previous study evaluated mortality prediction using the two most used frailty models in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the frailty phenotype and the frailty index with regard to accuracy in the prediction of mortality among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted involving 674 older adults. Thirty-five variables (signs, symptoms, chronic diseases and disabilities) were used for the construction of the frailty index (FI). The frailty phenotype index (FPI) was defined based on the criteria proposed in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Periodic verifications were performed in the databank of the Mortality Information System. Cox regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of mortality and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty was greater based using the FI (16.3%) compared to the FPI (5.34%). Older adults classified as frail by the FPI had a greater risk of death (RR: 10.03; 95% CI: 4.43-22.74) that those classified as frail by the FI (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.25-3.00). The lowest survival rate was found in the group of older adults classified as frail based on the FPI and classified as pre-frail and robust based on the FI. CONCLUSION: The FPI demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting the risk of mortality among Brazilian older adults than the FI. The validation of frailty measures is fundamental to the identification of older adults who are more vulnerable to adverse health events.
Assuntos
Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Humanos , Vida Independente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The number of older adults attending emergency department (ED) is increasing all over the world. Usually, those patients are potentially more complex due to their greater number of comorbidities, cognitive disorders, and functional or physical disabilities. Frailty is a vulnerable state that could predict adverse outcomes of those patients. There are very few studies that addressed this topic in the ED, and none of them used a simple instrument for frailty assessment. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to evaluate the association between frailty identified through the FRAIL questionnaire at baseline and death after a 6-month follow-up period after hospital discharge from the ED. Secondary outcomes were readmission to the ED and disability after 6 months. METHODS: A 6-month follow-up prospective study (FASES study) was conducted at a university-based trauma-center ED in Jundiaí, southwestern of Brazil. A total of 316 older adults aged 60 or older were randomly included based on a lottery of their medical record admission number. Frailty was evaluated through the FRAIL questionnaire. The association between frailty and death was estimated through a binary logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and cognitive performance. RESULTS: From the total sample, the mean age was 72.11±8.0 years, and 51.6% were women. Participants presented 2.28±1.4 comorbidities and 25.6% were frail. Mean hospital stay was 5.43±5.6 days. Death occurred in 52 participants, readmission to the emergency in 55, and new disability in 16 after 6 months. Frailty was associated with an odds ratio of 2.18 for death after 6 months (95% CI = 1.10-4.31; p = 0.024). This association lost significance after multivariate analysis taking into account cognitive performance. There was no association between frailty status at baseline and readmission to the ED or disability. CONCLUSION: The identification of frailty using the FRAIL at admission was not predictive of death after a 6-month period after discharge from the ED. Simple frailty assessment could identify patients at higher risk for death in the follow-up.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: the aims of the present study were: (1) investigate the prevalence and association of polypharmacy and pre-frailty or frailty in a middle-income country sample of older adults; and (2) evaluate the prevalence of potential inappropriate prescription (PIP) and its association with pre-frailty or frailty. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Outpatient center at a university-based hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: 629 older adults from both sexes evaluated between June 2014 and July 2016. MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was identified through the FRAIL scale. All medications received were analyzed by research staff. Presence of PIP was evaluated according to the 2015 updated Beers list. Binary logistic regression tested the association between 4 definitions of polypharmacy (≥ 3, 4, 5, and 6 drugs), and presence of PIP, and the dependent variable pre-frailty and frailty. RESULTS: 15.7% of participants were frail. Polypharmacy was present in 219 (34.8%), and PIP was observed in 184 (29.3%) older adults. All definitions of polypharmacy were significantly associated with frailty (OR between 2.05 to 2.34, p < 0.001). Polypharmacy with 4 or 5 or more drugs were associated with pre-frailty (OR 1.53 and 1.47, respectively). PIP was not associated with frailty (OR 1.47, p = 0.149). CONCLUSIONS: Several definitions of polypharmacy were associated with frailty, but only two were associated with pre-frailty. The presence of PIP was not associated with pre-frailty or frailty.