RESUMO

RATIONALE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by continuous inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis, and favorable response to immunosuppression. An association between IBD and AIH is uncommon, and experts have suggested that in patients with overlapping IBD and AIH, the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents can be used. Therefore, this study reports a rare case of a patient with liver cirrhosis due to AIH and UC refractory to conventional treatment and discusses the risks and benefits of using anti-tumor necrosis factor in both conditions. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 28-year-old female presented with symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, asthenia, and inappetence, accompanied by abdominal collateral circulation, anemia, alteration of liver enzymes, and elevation of C-reactive protein levels. DIAGNOSES: The patient underwent a liver biopsy, which was consistent with liver cirrhosis due to AIH. Colonoscopy showed an inflammatory process throughout the colon, compatible with moderately active UC. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received mesalazine, azathioprine, and corticotherapy, with no control of the inflammatory process. Faced with refractoriness to drug treatment and side effects of corticosteroids with an increased risk of severe infection due to cirrhosis, we opted to use infliximab for the treatment of UC. The patient presented with a clinical response and infliximab therapy was maintained. OUTCOMES: Eight months after starting infliximab therapy, the patient developed pneumonia with complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation and died. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS: AIH is a rare cause of elevated transaminase levels in patients with UC. The best treatment to control the 2 conditions should be evaluated with vigilance for the side effects of medications, mainly infections, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects young adults of reproductive age, and questions related to pregnancy and breastfeeding are common in clinical practice. Most medications used to treat IBD are considered safe during pregnancy, except methotrexate and small molecules such as tofacitinib. Despite few studies regarding vedolizumab (VDZ) safety, it appears to be safe during pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to report the management of ulcerative colitis in pregnant patient refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents using VDZ. Case Report: A female, 38 years old, with ulcerative colitis was refractory to conventional treatment with mesalazine, sulfasalazine, and azathioprine. She was hospitalized at six weeks of gestation with severe acute colitis requiring the use of infliximab (IFX) to induce remission. She had a spontaneous abortion at nine weeks of gestation after the second dose of IFX. Since there was no endoscopic improvement after six months of IFX treatment, VDZ treatment was initiated. During the VDZ infusion period, the patient discovered that she was pregnant with twins, leading to the discussion of the risks and benefits of continuing the VDZ. The patient presented with disease clinical remission with the use of VDZ, and the babies were born at 34 weeks of gestation without complications. Breastfeeding was also performed without complications. Conclusion: Continued VDZ medication is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with adverse events similar to anti-TNF therapy.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most efficient way to prevent complications from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is to provide patients with optimized care. Nonetheless, in Brazil, there is no validated methodology for evaluating health services recognized as comprehensive care units (CCU), making it difficult to assess the quality of care provided. OBJECTIVE: To understand the current scenario, map the distribution of centers and identify strengths and weaknesses, considering local and regional characteristics. METHODS: The study was carried out in three phases. Initially, the Brazilian Organization for Crohn's disease and colitis (GEDIIB) developed 22 questions to characterize CCU in Brazil. In the second phase, all GEDIIB members were invited to respond to the survey with the 11 questions considered most relevant. In the last phase, an interim analysis of the results was performed, using the IBM SPSS Statistics v 29.0.1.0 software. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the center's profile. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: There were 53 responses from public centers (11 excluded). Most centers were concentrated in the Southeastern (n=22/52.4%) and only 1 (2.4%) in the Northern region of Brazil. Thirty-nine centers (92.9%) perform endoscopic procedures, but only 9 (21.4%) have access to enteroscopy and/or small bowel capsule endoscopy. Thirty-three centers (78.6%) offer infusion therapy locally, 26 (61.9%) maintain IBD patient records, 13 (31.0%) reported having an IBD nurse, 34 (81.0%) have specific evidence-based protocols and only 7 (16.7%) have a patient satisfaction methodology. In the private scenario there were 56 responses (10 excluded). There is also a concentration in the Southeastern and Southern regions. Thirty-nine centers (84.8%) have access to endoscopic procedures and 19 perform enteroscopy and/or small bowel capsule endoscopy, more than what is observed in the public environment. Infusion therapy is available in 24 centers (52.2%). Thirty-nine centers (84.8%) maintain a specific IBD patient database, 17 (37%) have an IBD nurse, 36 (78.3%) have specific evidence-based protocols, and 22 (47. 8%) apply a patient satisfaction methodology. CONCLUSION: IBD CCU in Brazil were mainly located in the Southeastern and Southern regions of the country. Most centers have dedicated multidisciplinary teams and IBD specialists. There is still a current need to improve the proportion of IBD nurses in IBD care in Brazil. BACKGROUND: •In Brazil, there is no validated methodology for evaluating health services recognized as comprehensive care units (CCU), making it difficult to assess the quality of care provided. BACKGROUND: •Most CCU were concentrated in the Southeast region and only one (2.4%) in the Northeast region of Brazil. This pattern follows the epidemiological trends of IBD in the country. BACKGROUND: •There is still difficulty in accessing enteroscopy and/or small bowel capsule endoscopy in the public health system. BACKGROUND: •Most centers have dedicated multidisciplinary teams and IBD specialist doctors. BACKGROUND: •There is still a current need to improve the proportion of nurses treating IBD in Brazil.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: The most efficient way to prevent complications from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is to provide patients with optimized care. Nonetheless, in Brazil, there is no validated methodology for evaluating health services recognized as comprehensive care units (CCU), making it difficult to assess the quality of care provided. Objective: To understand the current scenario, map the distribution of centers and identify strengths and weaknesses, considering local and regional characteristics. Methods: The study was carried out in three phases. Initially, the Brazilian Organization for Crohn's disease and colitis (GEDIIB) developed 22 questions to characterize CCU in Brazil. In the second phase, all GEDIIB members were invited to respond to the survey with the 11 questions considered most relevant. In the last phase, an interim analysis of the results was performed, using the IBM SPSS Statistics v 29.0.1.0 software. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the center's profile. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Results: There were 53 responses from public centers (11 excluded). Most centers were concentrated in the Southeastern (n=22/52.4%) and only 1 (2.4%) in the Northern region of Brazil. Thirty-nine centers (92.9%) perform endoscopic procedures, but only 9 (21.4%) have access to enteroscopy and/or small bowel capsule endoscopy. Thirty-three centers (78.6%) offer infusion therapy locally, 26 (61.9%) maintain IBD patient records, 13 (31.0%) reported having an IBD nurse, 34 (81.0%) have specific evidence-based protocols and only 7 (16.7%) have a patient satisfaction methodology. In the private scenario there were 56 responses (10 excluded). There is also a concentration in the Southeastern and Southern regions. Thirty-nine centers (84.8%) have access to endoscopic procedures and 19 perform enteroscopy and/or small bowel capsule endoscopy, more than what is observed in the public environment. Infusion therapy is available in 24 centers (52.2%). Thirty-nine centers (84.8%) maintain a specific IBD patient database, 17 (37%) have an IBD nurse, 36 (78.3%) have specific evidence-based protocols, and 22 (47. 8%) apply a patient satisfaction methodology. Conclusion: IBD CCU in Brazil were mainly located in the Southeastern and Southern regions of the country. Most centers have dedicated multidisciplinary teams and IBD specialists. There is still a current need to improve the proportion of IBD nurses in IBD care in Brazil.

RESUMO Contexto: A forma mais eficiente de prevenir complicações da doença inflamatória intestinal (DII) é proporcionar aos pacientes cuidados otimizados. Contudo, no Brasil não existe uma metodologia validada para avaliação de serviços de saúde reconhecidos como unidades de atenção integral (UAI), dificultando a avaliação da qualidade da assistência prestada. Objetivo: Compreender o cenário atual, mapear a distribuição dos polos e identificar pontos fortes e fracos, considerando as características locais e regionais. Métodos: O estudo foi realizado em três fases. Inicialmente, a Organização Brasileira para Doença de Crohn e Colite (GEDIIB) desenvolveu 22 questões para caracterizar as UAI no Brasil. Na segunda fase, todos os membros do GEDIIB foram convidados a responder ao inquérito com as 11 questões consideradas mais relevantes. Na última fase foi realizada uma análise dos resultados, utilizando o software IBM SPSS Statistics v 29.0.1.0. Estatísticas descritivas foram utilizadas para caracterizar o perfil do centro. O teste qui-quadrado foi utilizado para comparar variáveis categóricas. Resultados: Houve 53 respostas de centros públicos (11 excluídas). A maioria das UAI concentrou-se na região sudeste (n=22/52,4%) e apenas 1 (2,4%) na região norte do Brasil. Trinta e nove centros (92,9%) realizam procedimentos endoscópicos, mas apenas 9 (21,4%) têm acesso à enteroscopia e/ou cápsula endoscópica. Trinta e três centros (78,6%) oferecem terapia de infusão localmente, 26 (61,9%) mantêm registros de pacientes com DII, 13 (31,0%) relataram ter uma enfermeira para DII, 34 (81,0%) têm protocolos específicos baseados em evidências e apenas 7 (16,7%) %) possuem uma metodologia de satisfação do paciente. No cenário privado houve 56 respostas (10 excluídas). Há também concentração nas regiões sudeste e sul. Trinta e nove centros (84,8%) têm acesso a procedimentos endoscópicos e 19 realizam enteroscopia e/ou cápsula endoscópica, mais do que o observado no ambiente público. A terapia infusional está disponível em 24 centros (52,2%). Trinta e nove centros (84,8%) mantêm um banco de dados específico de pacientes com DII, 17 (37%) têm uma enfermeira para DII, 36 (78,3%) têm protocolos específicos baseados em evidências e 22 (47,8%) aplicam uma metodologia de satisfação do paciente. Conclusão: As UAI do DII no Brasil estavam localizadas principalmente nas regiões sudeste e sul do país. A maioria dos centros possui equipes multidisciplinares dedicadas e médicos com experiencia em DII. Ainda há uma necessidade atual de melhorar a proporção de enfermeiros no tratamento de DII no Brasil.

RESUMO

•An identification of the profile of inflammatory bowel disease nurses in Brazil was peformed, and only four nurses worked exclusively with patients with inflammatory bowel disease. •The main areas of activity were outpatient clinics and ostomy care. •Nursing care was based on the nursing process, and the main topics approached in these appointments were treatment adherence and ostomy. •Nurses showed knowledge on immunosuppressive medications and biological therapy. Background - Nurses play a fundamental role within the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary team. Objective - To identify the profile of IBD nurses in Brazil and their work process organization and characterize the health services where they work. Methods - A questionnaire-based research was developed. The inclusion criteria were nurses with experience in IBD care, nurses with scientific research published in an indexed journal or in process, nurses with master's or doctorate degrees concluded or in progress, and educator nurses with expertise in IBD.Results - Seventy-four nurses were included, among whom 66 (89.19%) were women; their mean age was 40.63±9.98 years. Sixty-six percent work in the Southeast region, and more than half (54.05%) had a specialization course. Only four (5.41%) nurses worked exclusively with patients with IBD. The main areas of activity were outpatient clinics (39%) and ostomy care (35%). Nursing care was based on the nursing process (51.35%), and the main topics approached in nursing appointment were treatment adherence (72.97%), and ostomy (68.92%). Forty-seven (63.51%) nurses had knowledge on immunosuppressive medications and 52 (70.27%) on biological therapy. Most health services were integrated with a hospital that has clinical (72.97%) and surgical hospitalization units (67.57%), and 46 (62.16%) of them had an infusion center. Conclusion - Describing the work process of IBD nurses can supplement their organization of the IBD assistance process, as they do not follow any specific consensus. In addition, the characteristics necessary for IBD care are not found in all health services.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: Nurses play a fundamental role within the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary team. Objective: To identify the profile of IBD nurses in Brazil and their work process organization and characterize the health services where they work. Methods: A questionnaire-based research was developed. The inclusion criteria were nurses with experience in IBD care, nurses with scientific research published in an indexed journal or in process, nurses with master's or doctorate degrees concluded or in progress, and educator nurses with expertise in IBD. Results: Seventy-four nurses were included, among whom 66 (89.19%) were women; their mean age was 40.63±9.98 years. Sixty-six percent work in the Southeast region, and more than half (54.05%) had a specialization course. Only four (5.41%) nurses worked exclusively with patients with IBD. The main areas of activity were outpatient clinics (39%) and ostomy care (35%). Nursing care was based on the nursing process (51.35%), and the main topics approached in nursing appointment were treatment adherence (72.97%), and ostomy (68.92%). Forty-seven (63.51%) nurses had knowledge on immunosuppressive medications and 52 (70.27%) on biological therapy. Most health services were integrated with a hospital that has clinical (72.97%) and surgical hospitalization units (67.57%), and 46 (62.16%) of them had an infusion center. Conclusion: Describing the work process of IBD nurses can supplement their organization of the IBD assistance process, as they do not follow any specific consensus. In addition, the characteristics necessary for IBD care are not found in all health services.

RESUMO Contexto: Enfermeiros desempenham um papel fundamental na equipe multidisciplinar das doenças inflamatórias intestinais. Objetivo: Identificar o perfil dos enfermeiros especialistas em doença inflamatória intestinal no Brasil e a organização do processo de trabalho e caracterizar os serviços de saúde onde atuam. Métodos: Estudo transversal, desenvolvido com aplicação de questionário. Os critérios de inclusão foram enfermeiros com experiência na assistência às doenças inflamatórias intestinais, enfermeiros com pesquisas científicas publicadas em periódico indexado ou em andamento, enfermeiros com mestrado ou doutorado concluídos ou em andamento e enfermeiros educadores com expertise em doenças inflamatórias intestinais. Resultados: Foram incluídos 74 enfermeiros, dos quais 66 (89,19%) eram mulheres; a média de idade foi de 40,63±9,98 anos. Sessenta e seis por cento trabalham na região Sudeste, e mais da metade (54,05%) possui curso de especialização. Apenas quatro (5,41%) enfermeiros trabalhavam exclusivamente com pacientes com doença inflamatória intestinal. As principais áreas de atuação foram: ambulatório (39%) e cuidados com ostomia (35%). A assistência de enfermagem foi pautada no processo de enfermagem (51,35%) e os principais temas abordados na consulta de enfermagem foram adesão ao tratamento (72,97%) e estomia (68,92%). Quarenta e sete (63,51%) enfermeiros tinham conhecimento sobre medicamentos imunossupressores e 52 (70,27%) sobre terapia biológica. A maioria dos serviços de saúde estava integrada a um hospital que possui unidades de internação clínica (72,97%) e cirúrgica (67,57%), sendo que 46 (62,16%) deles possuíam centro de infusão. Conclusão: Descrever o processo de trabalho do enfermeiro em doença inflamatória intestinal brasileira pode complementar a organização no processo de assistência à doença inflamatória intestinal, uma vez que não segue nenhum consenso específico. Além disso, as características necessárias para o cuidado das doenças inflamatórias intestinais não são encontradas em todos os serviços de saúde.

RESUMO

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNFs) are widely used therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD); however, their administration is not risk-free. Heart failure (HF), although rare, is a potential adverse event related to administration of these medications. However, the exact mechanism of development of HF remains obscure. TNFα is found in both healthy and damaged hearts. Its effects are concentration- and receptor-dependent, promoting either cardio-protection or cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Experimental rat models with TNFα receptor knockout showed increased survival rates, less reactive oxygen species formation, and improved diastolic left ventricle pressure. However, clinical trials employing anti-TNF therapy to treat HF had disappointing results, suggesting abolishment of the cardioprotective properties of TNFα, making cardiomyocytes susceptible to apoptosis and oxidation. Thus, patients with IBD who have risk factors should be screened for HF before initiating anti-TNF therapy. This review aims to discuss adverse events associated with the administration of anti-TNF therapy, with a focus on HF, and propose some approaches to avoid cardiac adverse events in patients with IBD.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite optimized medical therapy, contemporary risk of surgery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 10 years of diagnosis is 9.2% in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 26.2% in Crohn's disease, (CD) in the biological era. OBJECTIVE: This consensus aims to detail guidance to the most appropriate surgical procedures in different IBD scenarios. In addition, it details surgical indications and perioperative management of adult patients with CD and UC. METHODS: Our consensus was developed by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists representing the Brazilian Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (GEDIIB), with the Rapid Review methodology being conducted to support the recommendations/statements. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the disease phenotypes, surgical indications, and techniques. After structuring the recommendations/statements, the modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to conduct the voting by experts in IBD surgery and gastroenterology. This consisted of three rounds: two using a personalized and anonymous online voting platform and one face-to-face presential meeting. Whenever participants did not agree with specific statements or recommendations, an option to outline possible reasons was offered to enable free-text responses and provide the opportunity for the experts to elaborate or explain disagreement. The consensus of recommendations/statements in each round was considered to have been reached if there was ≥80% agreement. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This consensus addressed the most relevant information to guide the decision-making process for adequate surgical management of CD and UC. It synthesizes recommendations developed from evidence-based statements and state-of-art knowledge. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the different disease phenotypes, indications for surgery and perioperative management. Specific focus of our consensus was given to elective and emergency surgical procedures, determining when to indicate surgery and which procedures may be the more appropriate. The consensus is targeted to gastroenterologists and surgeons interested in the treatment and management of adult patients with CD or UC and supports decision-making of healthcare payors, institutional leaders, and/or administrators.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases are immune-mediated disorders that include Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). UC is a progressive disease that affects the colorectal mucosa causing debilitating symptoms leading to high morbidity and work disability. As a consequence of chronic colonic inflammation, UC is also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This consensus aims to provide guidance on the most effective medical management of adult patients with UC. METHODS: A consensus statement was developed by stakeholders representing Brazilian gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons (Brazilian Organization for Crohn's Disease and Colitis [GEDIIB]). A systematic review including the most recent evidence was conducted to support the recommendations and statements. All recommendations/statements were endorsed using a modified Delphi Panel by the stakeholders/experts in inflammatory bowel disease with at least 80% or greater consensus. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The medical recommendations (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) were mapped according to the stage of treatment and severity of the disease onto three domains: management and treatment (drug and surgical interventions), criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatment, and follow-up/patient monitoring after initial treatment. The consensus targeted general practitioners, gastroenterologists and surgeons who manage patients with UC, and supports decision-making processes by health insurance companies, regulatory agencies, health institutional leaders, and administrators.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an immune-mediated disorder that includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. CD is characterized by a transmural intestinal involvement from the mouth to the anus with recurrent and remitting symptoms that can lead to progressive bowel damage and disability over time. OBJECTIVE: To guide the safest and effective medical treatments of adults with CD. METHODS: This consensus was developed by stakeholders representing Brazilian gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons (Brazilian Organization for Crohn's disease and Colitis (GEDIIB)). A systematic review of the most recent evidence was conducted to support the recommendations/statements. All included recommendations and statements were endorsed in a modified Delphi panel by the stakeholders and experts in IBD with an agreement of at least 80% or greater consensus rate. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The medical recommendations (pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions) were mapped according to the stage of treatment and severity of the disease in three domains: management and treatment (drug and surgical interventions), criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatment, and follow-up/patient monitoring after initial treatment. The consensus is targeted towards general practitioners, gastroenterologists, and surgeons interested in treating and managing adults with CD and supports the decision-making of health insurance companies, regulatory agencies, and health institutional leaders or administrators.

Assuntos