Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
1.
ABCD (São Paulo, Online) ; 36: e1720, 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1429507

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery patients have symptoms such as "plugging." Therefore, a possible good way to avoid these eating discomforts, typical of the early period after bariatric surgery, is to educate the patient. The Mindful Eating (ME) consists of paying attention to physical signs of hunger and satiety and developing awareness of emotional triggers related to food. In addition, conscious food choices reflect positively on the speed of chewing at mealtime. AIMS Due to the difficulties that patients reported during consultations to controlling their bad eating habits and the lack of tools to help the bariatric patient change eating habits, we elaborated "BariMEP: A Mindful Eating Placemat for bariatric surgery patients." METHODS The BariMEP was written by the multidisciplinary bariatric team based on a study by Russell et al. and ME principles in order to help bariatric patients pay attention to what and how they eat at each meal. RESULTS The BariMEP has some instructions based on Mindful Eating principles: get your seat at the table; do not distract yourself; before starting to eat, try breathing sometimes; recognize the internal hunger and satiety cues; let the fork rest at each bite and chew a lot; pay attention to the smell and taste; and be as present as possible at this time with nonjudgment. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, a tool has been developed with the aim of preparing the patient for bariatric surgery. Since the BariMEP is easy to teach and cheap, we suggest that the BariMEP be included in the bariatric surgery protocol.


RESUMO RACIONAL Pacientes operados de cirurgia bariátrica apresentam sintomas como "entalo". Portanto, uma possível maneira de evitar esses desconfortos alimentares, típicos do período inicial após a cirurgia bariátrica, é educar o paciente. O Mindful Eating (ME) consiste em avaliar aos sinais físicos de fome e saciedade e desenvolver a consciência dos gatilhos emocionais relacionados à alimentação. Além disso, as escolhas alimentares conscientes refletem positivamente na velocidade da mastigação durante as refeições. OBJETIVOS Devido às dificuldades, que os pacientes relataram durante as consultas, para controlar os maus hábitos alimentares e a falta de ferramentas para ajudar o paciente bariátrico na mudança, elaboramos o "BariMEP: um jogo americano de comer com atenção plena para pacientes de cirurgia bariátrica". MÉTODOS O BariMEP foi escrito pela equipe multidisciplinar bariátrica com base no estudo de Russell et al. e nos princípios do Mindful Eating, para ajudar os pacientes submetidos a cirurgia bariátrica a prestar atenção ao que e como comem em cada refeição. RESULTADOS O BariMEP possui algumas instruções baseadas nos princípios do Mindful Eating: Sente-se à mesa; não se distraia; antes de começar a comer, respire algumas vezes; reconheça os sinais de fome e saciedade; deixe o garfo descansar a cada mordida e mastigue bastante; preste atenção ao aroma e sabor; esteja o mais presente possível neste momento e sem julgamentos. CONCLUSÃO Pela primeira vez, foi desenvolvida uma ferramenta com o objetivo de preparar o paciente para a cirurgia bariátrica. Como o BariMEP é fácil de ensinar e barato, sugerimos que o BariMEP seja incluído no protocolo de cirurgia bariátrica.

2.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 35: e1682, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36102490

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is recommended that bariatric surgery candidates undergo psychological assessment. However, no specific instrument exists to assess the psychological well-being of bariatric patients, before and after surgery, and for which all constructs are valid for both genders. AIMS: This study aimed to develop and validate a new psychometric instrument to be used before and after bariatric surgery in order to assess psychological outcomes of patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that composed of 660 individuals from the community and bariatric patients. BariTest was developed on a Likert scale consisting of 59 items, distributed in 6 constructs, which assess the psychological well-being that influences bariatric surgery: emotional state, eating behavior, quality of life, relationship with body weight, alcohol consumption, and social support. Validation of BariTest was developed by the confirmatory factor analysis to check the content, criteria, and construct. The R statistical software version 3.5.0 was used in all analyses, and a significance level of 5% was used. RESULTS: Adjusted indices of the confirmatory factor analysis model indicate adequate adjustment. Cronbach's alpha of BariTest was 0.93, which indicates good internal consistency. The scores of the emotional state, eating behavior, and quality of life constructs were similar between the results obtained in the community and in the postoperative group, being higher than in the preoperative group. Alcohol consumption was similar in the preoperative and postoperative groups and was lower than the community group. CONCLUSIONS: BariTest is a reliable scale measuring the psychological well-being of patients either before or after bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 49: e20223056, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35858033

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: surgical treatment of obesity causes important changes in respiratory mechanics. AIM: Comparatively analyze respiratory muscle strength in post bariatric patients underwent to gastric bypass by laparotomy and laparoscopy during hospital stay. METHODS: observational study with a non-randomized longitudinal design, of a quantitative character. Data were collected from 60 patients with BMI 40Kg/m2, divided in laparotomy group (n=30) and laparoscopy group (n=30). Smokers, patients with previous lung diseases and those unable to perform the exam correctly were excluded. Both groups were evaluated at immediate postoperative, first and second postoperative days with manovacuometry for respiratory muscle strength and visual analogue pain scale. RESULTS: the sample was homogeneous in age, sex and BMI. Reduction in maximal respiratory pressures was observed after surgery for those operated on by laparotomy, no return to baseline values on discharge day on the second postoperative day. This group had also more severe pain and longer operative time. There was no difference in respiratory pressure measurements after surgery in the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSION: conventional bariatric surgery reduces muscle strength in the postoperative period and leads to more intense pain during hospitalization when compared to the laparoscopy group.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Laparotomia , Força Muscular , Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Período Pós-Operatório , Músculos Respiratórios , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 49: e20223056, 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1387216

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: surgical treatment of obesity causes important changes in respiratory mechanics. Aim: Comparatively analyze respiratory muscle strength in post bariatric patients underwent to gastric bypass by laparotomy and laparoscopy during hospital stay. Methods: observational study with a non-randomized longitudinal design, of a quantitative character. Data were collected from 60 patients with BMI 40Kg/m2, divided in laparotomy group (n=30) and laparoscopy group (n=30). Smokers, patients with previous lung diseases and those unable to perform the exam correctly were excluded. Both groups were evaluated at immediate postoperative, first and second postoperative days with manovacuometry for respiratory muscle strength and visual analogue pain scale. Results: the sample was homogeneous in age, sex and BMI. Reduction in maximal respiratory pressures was observed after surgery for those operated on by laparotomy, no return to baseline values on discharge day on the second postoperative day. This group had also more severe pain and longer operative time. There was no difference in respiratory pressure measurements after surgery in the laparoscopy group. Conclusion: conventional bariatric surgery reduces muscle strength in the postoperative period and leads to more intense pain during hospitalization when compared to the laparoscopy group.


RESUMO Introdução: o tratamento cirúrgico da obesidade acarreta importantes alterações na mecânica respiratória. Objetivo: analisar comparativamente a força muscular respiratória em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia bariátrica do tipo bypass gástrico por laparotomia e por videolaparoscopia durante o internamento cirúrgico. Métodos: estudo observacional com delineamento longitudinal não-randomizado, de caráter quantitativo. Foram coletados dados de 60 pacientes com índice de massa corporal igual ou superior a 40Kg/m2, candidatos a cirurgia bariátrica e divididos em grupo 1, para os operados por laparotomia (n=30), e grupo 2, para os operados por videolaparoscopia (n=30). Foram excluídos os tabagistas, os pacientes incapazes de executar o exame de forma correta e os portadores de doenças pulmonares prévias. Ambos os grupos foram avaliados no pré-operatório imediato, no primeiro e no segundo dias de pós-operatório através do teste de manovacuometria para a força muscular respiratória e da escala visual analógica de dor. Resultados: a amostra foi homogênea em relação à idade, índice de massa corporal e sexo. Foi observado redução das pressões respiratórias máximas após a cirurgia para os operados por laparotomia, sem retorno aos valores basais no dia da alta hospitalar no segundo dia pósoperatório. Esse grupo também cursou com dor mais intensa e maior tempo cirúrgico. Não houve diferença das medidas de pressão respiratória após a cirurgia no grupo operado por laparoscopia. Conclusões: a cirurgia bariátrica pela via convencional reduz a força muscular respiratória no pós-operatório e cursa com dor mais intensa durante a internação cirúrgica em relação à via laparoscópica.

5.
ABCD (São Paulo, Online) ; 35: e1682, 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1402851

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: It is recommended that bariatric surgery candidates undergo psychological assessment. However, no specific instrument exists to assess the psychological well-being of bariatric patients, before and after surgery, and for which all constructs are valid for both genders. AIMS: This study aimed to develop and validate a new psychometric instrument to be used before and after bariatric surgery in order to assess psychological outcomes of patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that composed of 660 individuals from the community and bariatric patients. BariTest was developed on a Likert scale consisting of 59 items, distributed in 6 constructs, which assess the psychological well-being that influences bariatric surgery: emotional state, eating behavior, quality of life, relationship with body weight, alcohol consumption, and social support. Validation of BariTest was developed by the confirmatory factor analysis to check the content, criteria, and construct. The R statistical software version 3.5.0 was used in all analyses, and a significance level of 5% was used. RESULTS: Adjusted indices of the confirmatory factor analysis model indicate adequate adjustment. Cronbach's alpha of BariTest was 0.93, which indicates good internal consistency. The scores of the emotional state, eating behavior, and quality of life constructs were similar between the results obtained in the community and in the postoperative group, being higher than in the preoperative group. Alcohol consumption was similar in the preoperative and postoperative groups and was lower than the community group. CONCLUSIONS: BariTest is a reliable scale measuring the psychological well-being of patients either before or after bariatric surgery.


RESUMO RACIONAL: Recomenda-se que os candidatos à cirurgia bariátrica sejam submetidos a uma avaliação psicológica. Contudo, não existe nenhum instrumento específico para avaliar os pacientes bariátricos, e que todos os construtos sejam válidos para ambos os sexos. OBJETIVOS: Desenvolver e validar um novo instrumento psicométrico para avaliar o bem-estar psicológico dos pacientes antes e após a cirurgia bariátrica. MÉTODOS: O estudo foi transversal e composto por 660 indivíduos da comunidade e pacientes bariátricos. O BariTest foi desenvolvido numa escala Likert composta por 59 itens, distribuídos em seis construtos, que avaliam o bem-estar psicológico que influenciam a cirurgia bariátrica: estado emocional, comportamento alimentar, qualidade de vida, relação com o peso corporal, consumo de álcool, e suporte social. A validação do BariTest foi feita pela validação de conteúdo, critério e construto e utilizou-se análise fatorial confirmatória. O software estatístico R versão 3.5.0, foi utilizado em todas as análises, com um nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Os índices ajustados do modelo análise fatorial confirmatória indicam um ajustamento adequado. O alfa de Cronbach do BariTest foi 0,93, o que indica uma boa consistência interna. As pontuações de estado emocional, comportamento alimentar e qualidade de vida foram semelhantes na comunidade e no grupo pós-operatório, sendo mais elevados do que no grupo pré-operatório. O consumo de álcool foi semelhante nos grupos pré e pós-operatórios e foi inferior ao do grupo comunitário. CONCLUSÕES: O BariTest é uma escala confiável que mede o bem-estar psicológico dos pacientes antes e após a cirurgia bariátrica.

6.
Obes Surg ; 31(3): 1290-1303, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392999

RESUMO

Weight regain is a multifactorial condition that affects many patients following bariatric surgery. The purpose of the paper is to review the multidisciplinary approach for the management of weight regain. We performed a search in current clinical evidence regarding the causes, consequences, and treatments of weight regain. The multidisciplinary approach with periodic monitoring is of fundamental importance to prevent or treat weight regain. Several therapeutic options are ranging from nutritional to surgical options, which should be tailored according to patients' anatomy, lifestyle behavior, and compliance. Specialized multidisciplinary care is the key to achieve optimal long-term weight loss and maintenance goals following bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Aumento de Peso , Redução de Peso
7.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 70(3): 262-270, 2020.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sedation for endoscopic procedures aims to provide high quality sedation, lower risks, short recovery time, superior recovery quality and absence of side effects, seeking high patient level of satisfaction. The goal of the study was to assess administration of remifentanil combined with propofol regarding the effects of the drug association during sedation and recovery for patients submitted to upper GI diagnostic endoscopy. METHOD: One hundred and five patients were assessed, randomly divided into three groups of 35 patients. The Control Group was sedated with propofol alone. Study Group 1 was sedated with a fixed dose of 0.2 µg.kg-1 remifentanil combined with propofol. Study Group 2 was sedated with 0.3 µg.kg-1 remifentanil combined with propofol. We assessed the quality of sedation, hemodynamic parameters, incidence of significant hypoxemia, time for spontaneous eye opening, post-anesthetic recovery time, quality of post-anesthetic recovery, presence of side effects and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Study Group 1 showed better quality of sedation. The groups in which remifentanil was administered combined with propofol showed shorter eye-opening time and shorter post-anesthetic recovery time compared to the control group. The three groups presented hemodynamic changes at some of the moments assessed. The incidence of significant hypoxemia, the quality of post-anesthetic recovery, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of propofol with remifentanil at a dose of 0.2 µg.kg-1 was effective in improving the quality of sedation, and at doses of 0.2 µg.kg-1 and 0.3 µg.kg-1 reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening and post-anesthetic recovery in comparison to sedation with propofol administered alone.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Sedação Profunda , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
8.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 70(3): 262-270, May-June 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês, Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1137186

RESUMO

Abstract Background and objectives: Sedation for endoscopic procedures aims to provide high quality sedation, lower risks, short recovery time, superior recovery quality and absence of side effects, seeking high patient level of satisfaction. The goal of the study was to assess administration of remifentanil combined with propofol regarding the effects of the drug association during sedation and recovery for patients submitted to upper gastrointestinal diagnostic endoscopy. Method: One hundred and five patients were assessed, randomly divided into three groups of 35 patients. The Control Group was sedated with propofol alone. Study Group 1 was sedated with a fixed dose of 0.2 µg.kg−1 remifentanil combined with propofol. Study Group 2 was sedated with 0.3 µg.kg−1 remifentanil combined with propofol. We assessed the quality of sedation, hemodynamic parameters, incidence of significant hypoxemia, time for spontaneous eye opening, post-anesthetic recovery time, quality of post-anesthetic recovery, presence of side effects and patient satisfaction. Results: Study Group 1 showed better quality of sedation. The groups in which remifentanil was administered combined with propofol showed shorter eye-opening time and shorter post-anesthetic recovery time compared to the control group. The three groups presented hemodynamic changes at some of the moments assessed. The incidence of significant hypoxemia, the quality of post-anesthetic recovery, the incidence of side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in the three groups. Conclusions: The combination of propofol with remifentanil at a dose of 0.2 µg.kg−1 was effective in improving the quality of sedation, and at doses of 0.2 µg.kg−1 and 0.3 µg.kg−1 reduced the time to spontaneous eye opening and post-anesthetic recovery in comparison to sedation with propofol administered alone.


Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A sedação para procedimentos endoscópicos pretende fornecer boa qualidade de sono, menores riscos, tempo de recuperação mais curto, qualidade de recuperação superior e ausência de efeitos colaterais, buscando um elevado nível de satisfação dos pacientes. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da associação do remifentanil ao propofol e seus efeitos durante a sedação e a recuperação em exames de endoscopia digestiva alta diagnóstica. Método: Foram avaliados 105, divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos de 35 pacientes. O Grupo Controle foi sedado apenas com o uso de propofol, o Grupo de Estudo 1 foi sedado com uso de remifentanil em dose fixa de 0,2 µg.Kg-1 associado ao propofol. E o Grupo de Estudo 2 foi sedado com o uso de remifentanil em dose fixa de 0,3 µg.Kg-1 associado ao propofol. Foram avaliadas a qualidade da sedação, comportamento hemodinâmico, incidência de hipoxemia significativa, tempo para abertura ocular espontânea, tempo de recuperação pós-anestésica, qualidade da recuperação pós-anestésica, presença de efeitos colaterais e satisfação do paciente. Resultado: O Grupo de Estudo 1 apresentou melhor qualidade de sedação. Os grupos em que se associou o remifentanil apresentaram tempo para abertura ocular e tempo de recuperação anestésica mais curtos em relação ao grupo controle. Os três grupos apresentaram alterações hemodinâmicas em algum dos momentos avaliados. A incidência de hipoxemia significativa, a qualidade da recuperação pós-anestésica, a incidência de efeitos colaterais e a satisfação dos pacientes foram similares nos três grupos. Conclusão: Conclui-se que a associação do remifentanil na dose de 0,2 µg.kg-1 mostrou-se efetivo na melhora da qualidade da sedação, e nas doses 0,2 µg.kg-1 e de 0,3 µg.kg-1 reduziu o tempo de abertura ocular espontânea e o tempo de recuperação pós-anestésica dos pacientes em relação a sedação apenas com propofol.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Sedação Profunda , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
9.
Endoscopy ; 52(3): 202-210, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31940667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy is a well-standardized surgical treatment for obesity. However, rates of weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy in long-term follow-up are relatively high. This multicenter study is the first to evaluate the use of an endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) technique for the management of this population. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study, including patients with weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy who underwent ESG for weight loss. Primary outcomes included absolute weight loss, percent total weight loss (%TWL), change in body mass index (BMI), percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months, and safety profile. Clinical success was defined as achieving ≥ 25 % EWL at 1 year, ≤ 5 % serious adverse event (SAE) rate following society-recommended thresholds, and %TWL ≥ 10 %. RESULTS: 34 patients underwent ESG after sleeve gastrectomy. Technical success was 100 %. At 1 year, 82.4 % and 100 % of patients achieved ≥ 10 %TWL and ≥ 25 % EWL, respectively. Mean (SD) %TWL was 13.2 % (3.9) and 18.3 % (5.5), and %EWL was 51.9 % (19.1) and 69.9 % (29.9) at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Mean (SD) %TWL was 14.2 % (12.5), 19.3 % (5.3), 17.5 % (5.2), and 20.4 % (3.3), and %EWL was 88.5 % (52.8), 84.4 % (22.4), 55.4 % (14.8), and 47.8 % (11.2) for BMI categories of overweight and obesity class I, II, and III, respectively, at 1 year. No predictors of success were identified in the multivariable regression analysis. No SAEs were reported. CONCLUSION: ESG appears to be safe and effective in the management of weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.


Assuntos
Gastroplastia , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Índice de Massa Corporal , Gastrectomia , Gastroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Aumento de Peso
10.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 30(1): 40-43, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368842

RESUMO

Background: Most of the obese patients undergoing an anti-reflux operation experience recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRNYGB) has been accepted as the bariatric surgery of choice for a previous GERD-operated obese patients. Methods: We present 85 consecutive patients from a single institution, previously submitted to antireflux surgery and then to LRNYGB. Preoperative endoscopy was carried out in all patients; 49 (57.64%) patients had findings of fundoplication failure or signs of persistent GERD, of those 20 (40.81%) with esophagitis. Results: From the bypass, per or postoperative minor to moderate complications occurred in 12 patients (14.11%): 2 (2.35%) conversions to laparotomy, 1 (1.17%) melena, 8 (9.41%) stenosis of gastrojejunostomy, treated by a simple endoscopic dilatation with a balloon, and 1 (1.17%) gastrogastric fistula. A follow-up endoscopy of 79 of 85 (92.9%) patients was carried out after 6 months of LRNYGB. Eight of 79 (10.12%) patients had persistent esophagitis that represented 40% (8 of 20 patients) of persistent reflux esophagitis even after LRNYGB. All of them were men. Conclusion: LRNYGB after laparoscopic fundoplication is a feasible procedure with an excepted higher rate of complications because of the complexity of the procedure. Nevertheless esophagitis still persisted in many of those patients.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Esofagite Péptica/etiologia , Feminino , Fundoplicatura , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA