RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of urolithiasis is 7-10% and has increased over the past years. Simple nephrectomy is, therefore, indicated when renal exclusion is associated with recurrent urinary tract infections and/or chronic pain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe the surgical experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LPN) due to urolithiasis in Mexican South-east and which factors can predispose conversion to open surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including patients with renal exclusion secondary to urolithiasis, who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Forty simple LPN for renal exclusion due to urolithiasis was performed between 2016 and 2019. Mean age was 47 ± 10.8 and 82.5% were female. The mean BMI was 30.2 ± 5 kg/m2, mean operative time was 165.2 ± 64. Conversion rate was 12.5% (n = 5). Conversion was significantly associated with abnormal hilum vascular anatomy (p = 0.001), hilum adherences (p = 0.001), and hydronephrosis (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: LPN is a safe surgical technique for renal exclusion due to urolithiasis. Hydronephrosis, abnormal vascular anatomy, and the adherences that involved de hilum are the factors that could predictive conversion to open surgery.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La prevalencia the urolitiasis es del 7-10% sin embargo a presentado un incremento del numero de casos en los ultimos años. La nefrectomia simple laparoscopica esta indicada en pacientes con exclusión renal asociado a cuadros repetitivos de infecciones en el tracto urinario y o dolor cronico a nivel fosa renal. OBJETIVO: Describir la experiencia de nefrectomia simple laparoscopica en pacientes con exclusion renal secundario litiasis en un hospital del sur de México, y que factores pueden predisponer la conversión a cirugia abierta. MATERIALS Y METODOS: Estudio restrospectivo que incluyo pacientes con exclusion renal secundario a urolitiasis durante el periodo comprendido entre 2016 y 2019. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 40 nefrectomias simples laparoscopica durante el periodo comprendido 2016 y 2019 en paciente con exclusion renal asociada a litiasis. La media edad 47 ± 10.8 años, el 82.5% de los pacientes fueron del sexo femenino. La media de Indice de masa corporal fue de 30.2 ± 5 kg/m2, La tasa de conversion fue del 12.5% (n = 5), los factores que se asociaron a conversion a cirugia abierta fueron anormalidades dependientes del hilio vascular renal (p = 0.001)., adherencias dependientes del hilio renal (p = 0.001). e hidronefrosis (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: La nefrectomia simple laparocopica es un procedimiento seguro en pacienres con exclusion renal secundaria a urolitiasis. Hidronefrosis, anormalidades dependientes del hilio vascular renal y adherencias que involucren el hilio renal son factores que pueden predisponer conversion a cirugia abierta.

Assuntos

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both options for treating >1cm kidney stones, controversies exist on whether one is more effective and safer than the other. OBJECTIVE: To systematically appraise randomized trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of mPCNL and RIRS for treating >1cm kidney stones. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in August 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Randomized trials comparing mPCNL and RIRS for >1cm kidney stones, and reporting stone-free rate (SFR), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and/or complications, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight studies compared mPCNL and RIRS, but one was not included due to its high risk of bias. SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.06 [95% coefficient interval {CI}, 1.01-1.10], p=0.008). Hemoglobin drop was higher for mPCNL (mean difference [MD]: 0.35 [95% CI, 0.05-0.65] g/dl, p=0.02); however, transfusion rates were similar (p=0.44). Complication rate was similar between mPCNL and RIRS (p=0.39), and the LOS was higher for mPCNL (MD: 1.11 [95% CI, 0.06-2.16] d, p=0.04). A subgroup analysis of lower pole stones showed that SFR was higher for mPCNL (RR: 1.09 [95% CI, 1.00-1.19], p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches are effective and safe. Among these approaches, mPCNL has a higher SFR than RIRS for overall >1cm renal and lower pole stones, but longer LOS, and a higher hemoglobin drop that does not translate into higher transfusion rates. Complications are comparable. PATIENT SUMMARY: Randomized trials have evaluated whether miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery is more effective and safer for treating >1cm stones. After comparing the stone-free rate, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and complications between both the approaches, mPCNL was found to be slightly more effective, but both were equally safe.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary Stone Disease (USD) arises from an interaction of genetic and environmental factors. Urinary metabolic abnormalities are well described as risk factors. In Mexico, the Maya region holds the highest prevalence of USD. Treatment of these abnormalities lowers the risk of recurrences. AIM: Assess the underlying metabolic abnormalities of patients with USD to provide a rationale to lead further prevention strategies. METHODS: Clinical and demographical data from patients coming to the Stone Clinic were prospectively collected along with a 24 h urinary panel to identify metabolic abnormalities. All participants signed consent and the study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 13 years, 75.4% were female. A positive family history of stones was observed in 40 and 87.3% were overweight/obese. The frequency of hypocitraturia, hypercalciuria, hypomagnesuria, hyperoxaluria, and hyperuricosuria was 91.3, 68.5, 42.1, 36.5, and 26.6%, respectively. Median urinary citrate was 79.5 (37.5-160) mg/24 h and was inversely correlated to glycemia. Urine Calcium/Creatinine index was correlated with Hounsfield units (HU) (p = 0.01). Oxalate was correlated with HU and stone burden. Interestingly, dietary distribution of macro- and micronutrients were similar between groups. Patients with a single kidney had lower citrate and higher urinary calcium. CONCLUSIONS: Interestingly, a shortage of inhibitors such as citrate and magnesium are highly prevalent in patients with USD from the Maya region and seems to be influenced by other metabolic conditions as malnutrition next to the genetic component.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Hounsfield units (HU) are a measure of radiodensity, related to the density of a tissue and the composition of kidney stones. Hounsfield density is what is related to the composition of kidney stones. In the standard acquisition method, these measures are arbitrary and dependent on the operator. This study describes the implementation of a technique based on the HU and Hounsfield density to predict the stone compositions of patients with nephrolithiasis. By conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy, thirty kidney stone samples corresponding to the cortex, middle, and nucleus were obtained. The HU were obtained by CT scanning with a systematic grid. Hounsfield density was calculated as the HU value divided by the stone's greatest diameter (HU/mm). With that method and after analyzing the samples by IR-spectroscopy, anhydrous uric acid and ammonium magnesium phosphate were identified as the compounds of kidney stones. Additionally, anhydrous uric acid, magnesium ammonium phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate were identified via Hounsfield density calculation. The study identified HU ranges for stone compounds using a systematic technique that avoids bias in its analysis. In addition, this work could contribute to the timely diagnosis and development of personalized therapies for patients with this pathology.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: This study aims to assess primary care physicians (PCPs) knowledge and skills regarding prostate cancer early detection (PCa-ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey about knowledge and skills of PCa-ED was delivered to PCP. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for the propensity of PCP to test prostatic specific antigen (PSA) on asymptomatic men. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 170 PCP. Score on risk factors knowledge was 51.5 ± 15.7% a better score was not associated with conducting PCa-ED (p = 0.674). The 40.6% answered having an institutional program on PCa-ED and 86% having access to PSA testing. Testing PSA on asymptomatic men was found in 40%. Moreover, 61.2% do not performed any digital rectal examination for PCa-ED, and this was not associated with preventing factors such as lack of space, time, and assistance (p > 0.05). Fewer years in practice and being a family medicine resident were associated with a less likelihood of testing PSA in asymptomatic men. The only associated factor in the multivariable model was having access to PSA testing (odds ratio: 3.36 confidence interval 95% 1.54-7.30) p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of PCP performs PCa-ED and using concepts outside evidence-based recommendations. A national program on PCa-ED and continuing medical education for PCP are a promising strategy to improve PCa-ED.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el conocimiento y las habilidades de los médicos de primer contacto en la detección oportuna del cáncer de próstata (DO-CaP). MÉTODO: Se aplicó una encuesta a médicos de primer contacto. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística evaluando la propensión de los médicos a medir el antígeno prostático específico (APE) en sujetos asintomáticos. RESULTADOS: Contestaron 170 médicos y la calificación del conocimiento sobre factores de riesgo fue de 51.5 ± 15.7%, pero una mejor calificación no se asoció con realizar DO-CaP (p = 0.674). El 40.6% respondió contar con un programa institucional en DO-CaP y un 86% con acceso a la prueba de APE. El 40% medían el APE en sujetos asintomáticos. El 61.2% no ­realizaba ningún examen digital rectal para DO-CaP, y esto no se asoció con factores limitantes como falta de tiempo, espacio o asistencia (p > 0.05). Menos años en práctica y ser residente de medicina familiar disminuyeron la probabilidad de determinar el APE en asintomáticos. El único factor asociado en el análisis multivariado fue el acceso a la prueba de APE (odds ratio: 3.36; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.54-7.30; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIÓN: Una baja proporción de médicos de primer contacto realizan DO-CaP y utilizan conceptos alejados de la evidencia científica. Un programa nacional en DO-CaP y de educación continua para médicos de primer contacto es una estrategia prometedora para mejorar la DO-CaP.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread worldwide rapidly, developing into a global health crisis. At the same time, it has seriously impacted the daily activities in all the fields of urology. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical, academic, and scientific activities as well as on the quality of life of urologists from the main centers in Europe. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a survey using a 37-item questionnaire. The survey included three main sections: clinical practice, academic/scientific activities, and personal/social quality of life. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A descriptive analysis was performed using the collected data. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 107 representatives affiliated to different centers from 22 countries completed the survey. Clinical activities were affected in 54.2% of the centers, and 85.0% of the elective surgeries were cancelled. Of the urological departments, 64.5% were still performing minimally invasive surgery for malignant disease. In 33.6% of the hospitals, dedicated and specially equipped operating theaters for COVID-19-positive patients were not available. According to 72.9% of participants, COVID-19 had a substantial negative impact on academic activities, and 82.3% of the respondents agreed that their quality of life has been affected negatively by the pandemic. Finally, 92.5% of the participants believe that the pandemic will have a moderate to severe impact on the health system of their countries. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected in this survey provide insight into changes brought about in clinical and academic settings amid COVID-19. Along with shortages such as bed occupancy and personal protective equipment, it highlights negative impacts on academic and scientific activities, including the personal and social life of urologists. PATIENT SUMMARY: It is essential to understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on clinical, academic, and scientific urological activities, as well as on related personal and social issues.

RESUMO

The Spanish version of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) questionnaire was developed and validated. A double-back translation of the WISQOL was conducted and syntactic amendments were made, resulting in the Spanish version of the WISQOL (S-WISQOL) which then went through a readability analysis. Stone formers from two hospitals in Mexico (Merida and Monterrey) filled in the S-WISQOL and the Short Form 36 (SF36). Convergent validity was assessed by the correlation of both questionnaires. Internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's α, and external validity by comparing between centers. The impact of clinical settings on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores was tested. Each hospital's institutional review board approved the project and informed consent was obtained from all participants. A total of 87 Spanish-speakers patients completed the S-WISQOL and SF36 and a good correlation was found between both (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). S-WISQOL readability was rated as "easy". Patients from Merida had longer median duration (years) with stones, more stone-related procedures, and hospitalizations, and scored lower on WISQOL (p = 0.006). Internal consistency was good as Cronbach's α coefficients ranged between acceptable and excellent. Stone-related admissions and duration of stones were inversely correlated with S-WISQOL score (- 0.254 and - 0.283, respectively; p < 0.005) but not to SF36. The S-WISQOL is an internally consistent, reliable, and valid instrument to assess HRQOL in Spanish-speaking patients with kidney stones. The S-WISQOL is generalizable as demonstrated by good external validity among centers. S-WISQOL scores can be added as an outcome for kidney stone treatments.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The most relevant recent findings on the use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in adult population to provide an insight of its role in the current and future of stone treatment. Comparing ESWL with other modalities is not in the scope of this review. RECENT FINDINGS: We conducted a PubMed/Embase search and reviewed recent publications that include relevant information on the development of ESWL. Low-rate shock waves improve stone breakage, ramping energy modalities improve stone fragmentation and have lower incidence of hematoma and kidney injury. Transgluteal approach is suggested to improve stone-free rates for distal ureteral stones in a single session. Proper coupling is the most important technical aspect of the treatment and coupling improvement can be achieved by optical monitorization. Triple D score is a promising tool in proper patient selection, but external validation is needed. Predictive information arising from computed tomography scans has been refined by the variant coefficient of stone density and 3D texture analysis that might improve outcomes in the future. SUMMARY: Recent evidence suggests that modifying techniques and protocols, and better patient selection are the current trends for improving ESWL outcomes. EWSL will keep its role as the single noninvasive treatment in stone management with room for outcome improvement in the future.

Assuntos