Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Anim Sci ; 97(11): 4567-4578, 2019 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563955

RESUMO

Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle are detrimental to animal performance and economic return. Tylosin, a macrolide antibiotic, is used to reduce prevalence of liver abscesses, though there is variable efficacy among different groups of cattle. There is an increased importance in better understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of this condition because of growing concern over antibiotic resistance and increased scrutiny regarding use of antibiotics in food animal production. The objective of this study was to compare the microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance genes (resistomes) of feces of feedlot cattle administered or not administered tylosin and in their pen soil in 3 geographical regions with differing liver abscess prevalences. Cattle (total of 2,256) from 3 geographical regions were selected for inclusion based on dietary supplementation with tylosin (yes/no). Feces and pen soil samples were collected before harvest, and liver abscesses were identified at harvest. Shotgun and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing were used to evaluate the soil and feces. Microbiome and resistome composition of feces (as compared by UniFrac distances and Euclidian distances, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) among tylosin or no tylosin-administered cattle. However, feedlot location was associated with differences (P ≤ 0.05) of resistomes and microbiomes. Using LASSO, a statistical model identified both fecal and soil microbial communities as predictive of liver abscess prevalence in pens. This model explained 75% of the variation in liver abscess prevalence, though a larger sample size would be needed to increase robustness of the model. These data suggest that tylosin exposure does not have a large impact on cattle resistomes or microbiomes, but instead, location of cattle production may be a stronger driver of both the resistome and microbiome composition of feces.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Doenças dos Bovinos/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais/análise , Abscesso Hepático/veterinária , Microbiota/efeitos dos fármacos , Tilosina/administração & dosagem , Ração Animal/análise , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Bovinos/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Geografia , Abscesso Hepático/epidemiologia , Abscesso Hepático/microbiologia , Abscesso Hepático/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Metagenômica , Microbiota/genética , Modelos Estatísticos , Prevalência , Microbiologia do Solo
2.
Anim Front ; 8(3): 23-29, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002220
4.
Meat Sci ; 96(2 Pt A): 729-36, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24200564

RESUMO

Retail packages (N=1004) containing fresh US beef in display cases in five cities across three regions of Mexico were surveyed for cut types, cutting styles, fat thickness measurements, marbling scores, and USDA Quality Grades to gain an overview of fresh US beef in Mexican retail markets. Data were analyzed to generate frequency distributions and examine the effect of city, geographical region, store chain, and socio-economic status of the targeted clientele on type, cutting style, fat measures and quality of beef cuts of US origin. Top round, bottom round and knuckle were the most common cut types. Milanesa-type slice and "bistec" (steak for grilling) were the predominant cutting styles. Over 95% of the retail cuts were trimmed to 3.2mm or less of external fat. Most cuts were USDA Select (74.5%) and USDA Choice (24.5%). External fat thickness and marbling score differed among cities and store chains (P<0.01).


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Manipulação de Alimentos/normas , Qualidade dos Alimentos , Carne/normas , Animais , Bovinos , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , México , Músculo Esquelético/química , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Agriculture
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA