RESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of VTE and clinical outcomes in a cohort of cancer patients and COVID-19 infection, and to establish possible predictive factors of VTE. METHODS/PATIENTS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the incidence of VTE and mortality in 118 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to August 2020. We calculated individual Khorana Risk and CATS-MICA scores in order to evaluate their utility to identify risk of VTE or death. Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon or Student's T test, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact text among patients with and without VTE. A Log-Rank test was performed to detect mortality differences between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. VTE global incidence was 4.2% (n = 5), and mortality 25.4% (n = 30). Obesity (p = 0.05), recent chemotherapy (p = 0.049) and use of steroids (p = 0.006) were related to higher risk of VTE in the univariate analysis, although they were not confirmed in the multivariate analysis as independent risk factors. Statistically significant differences in all-cause, COVID-19-related and cancer-related mortality according to the Khorana risk score (KRS) were observed. CATS-MICA score (CMS) also showed statistically significant differences in mortality between low- and high-risk patients. Prediction of risk of VTE development with these scores showed a tendency towards significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, VTE incidence was similar to previously reported in the general population with SARS-CoV-2 infection. KRS was associated with overall and specific-cause mortality, and might be a useful prognostic tool in this setting.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB). METHODS: This was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings. RESULTS: We included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9 months (95% CI 2.4-19.5). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.