RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of prone vs supine position on the oxygenation instability among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving noninvasive respiratory support, as assessed by the average oxygen saturation (SpO2) histograms. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-nine histograms from 23 VLBW infants were studied prospectively. Each infant was studied during 3 consecutive 3-hour periods of alternating positions; 12 infants started the study while prone and 11 infants started supine, by random order. Histogram classification system was used to quantify oxygenation stability and time spent in different SpO2 ranges. RESULTS: The fraction of inspired oxygen values were similar in both positions. Unstable histograms were more common in supine vs prone position (20/34 [59%] vs 10/35 [29%]; P = .02, respectively). Analyzing oxygenation stability as per position change revealed that a change from prone to supine increased oxygenation instability, and supine to prone decreased instability (P = .02). In the supine vs prone position, percent of time spent in SpO2 ≤80% and <90% was higher (5.0 ± 4.2 vs 2.4 ± 3.4 [P < .001] and 24.1 ± 13.7 vs 13.2 ± 10.0 [P < .001], respectively), and percent of time in SpO2 >94% was lower (39.7 ± 26.0 vs 52.4 ± 23.4 [P = .04]). CONCLUSIONS: Prone positioning decreased oxygenation instability and resulted in higher oxygenation among VLBW premature infants on noninvasive respiratory support. SpO2 histograms allow easy bedside assessment of oxygenation instability, and quantification of the time spent at different SpO2 ranges.
Assuntos
Apneia/terapia , Posicionamento do Paciente , Decúbito Ventral , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/terapia , Decúbito Dorsal , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Masculino , Saturação de Oxigênio/fisiologia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patterns of narcotic and sedative use in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across Canada using data collected by the Canadian Neonatal Network. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of preterm neonates at <33 weeks' gestation and admitted to a participating Canadian Neonatal Network NICU. The proportion of all neonates who received sedative(s), narcotic(s), or either sedative(s), narcotic(s), or both during their NICU stay was calculated for each year. Because opioids are used for premedication before intubation, only continuous infusions of a narcotic drug were included. Variation in narcotics and sedative usage between sites in 2014 was determined using logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for gestational age, surgery, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of 20 744 neonates, 29% of neonates received a narcotic, a sedative, or both; 23% received a narcotic and 17% a sedative. Although no clinically significant changes in drug exposure were documented during the 5-year period, there were statistically significant differences in narcotic and sedative use between sites, ranging from 3% to 41% for narcotic and 2% to 48% for sedative use (aORs 0.2-5.7 and 0.1-15, respectively, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to narcotic or sedative agents is highly variable in preterm neonates across Canada despite concerns of adverse outcomes associated with these drugs. The tremendous variation in practice suggests that further research on their current usage, as well as identifying optimal practice procedures is warranted.