Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(6): 348.e1-4, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386888

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A bladder diary (BD) is a simple and non-invasive method of evaluating people with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Recently, the ICCS recommended a 48-h daytime frequency and volume chart (which does not need to be recorded on 2 consecutive days) to evaluate lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction. However, some studies on adults have demonstrated that a minimum of 3 days is required. It is believed that, to date, there are no studies in the literature that compare a 2-day BD with a 3-day BD. The advantages of a BD over a shorter period of time are the simplicity and possible better parent compliance. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate if a 2-day BD is statistically and clinically comparable to a 3-day BD. STUDY DESIGN: A voiding diary was filled in over a 3-day period for 92 children (ages ranged from to 3-16 years, mean 7.9 ± 3.07) attending the present institution. By using the voiding diary, the following parameters were calculated: urination frequency, maximum and average volumes of urine (MVV and AVV) and fluid intake. The diary considered the 2 days as the first and second days of the 3-day diary. RESULTS: Out of the 92 children, eight (8.7%) did not properly complete the diary. The sample predominantly comprised females (n = 55, 59.8%). No differences were seen between 2-day and 3-day bladder diaries regarding fluid intake, maximum and average voided volume. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the 2-day bladder diary for detecting frequency were 83.4%, 91.7%, 80% and 93.2%, and for low bladder capacity they were 97.2%, 90.9%, 99% and 88%, respectively (Table). DISCUSSION: In a 2006 document, the ICCS recommended that a bladder diary be kept for 3 days, but in new documentation (2014) there is a reference stating that 2 days are enough. Bladder capacity is an important parameter in evaluating LUTS. Using a 2-day BD, the data showed that only a small percentage of reduced bladder capacity diagnosis would be lost. CONCLUSION: When using the 2-day diary, a 16% false negative rate for frequency should be expected. A 2-day bladder diary is sufficient to evaluate bladder capacity and fluid intake.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA