RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After recently published randomized clinical trials, the choice of the best anesthetic procedure for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is not definite. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation (CS) in patients with AIS who underwent MT, explicitly focusing on procedural and clinical outcomes and the incidence of adverse events. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GA versus CS in patients who underwent MT due to LVO-AIS. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random effects models were used for all outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (1,300 patients) were included, of whom 650 (50%) underwent GA. Recanalization success was significantly higher in the GA group (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.26-2.24; p < 0.04) than in CS. No significant difference between groups were found for good functional recovery (OR 1.13; IC 95% 0.76-1.67; p = 0.56), incidence of pneumonia (OR 1.23; IC 95% 0.56- 2,69; p = 0.61), three-month mortality (OR 0.99; IC 95% 0.73-1.34; p = 0.95), or cerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.97; IC 95% 0.68-1.38; p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Despite the increase in recanalization success rates in the GA group, GA and CS show similar rates of good functional recovery, three-month mortality, incidence of pneumonia, and cerebral hemorrhage in patients undergoing MT.

ANTECEDENTES: A trombectomia mecânica (TM) é o padrão de tratamento para pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo (AVCI) devido à oclusão de grandes vasos (OGV). No entanto, ainda não está claro qual é o procedimento anestésico mais benéfico para a TM. OBJETIVO: Nosso objetivo foi comparar a eficácia e a segurança da anestesia geral (AG) versus sedação consciente (SC) em pacientes com AVCI submetidos à TM, focando especificamente nos resultados procedimentais e clínicos, bem como na incidência de eventos adversos. MéTODOS: Foram realizadas buscas sistemáticas nas bases PubMed, Embase e Cochrane por ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) comparando AG versus SC em pacientes submetidos à TM devido a AVCI por OGV. Razões de chances (ORs) foram calculadas para desfechos binários, com intervalos de confiança de 95% (ICs). Modelos de efeitos aleatórios foram usados para todos os resultados. A heterogeneidade foi avaliada com estatísticas I2. RESULTADOS: Oito ensaios clínicos randomizados (1.300 pacientes) foram incluídos, dos quais 650 (50%) foram submetidos à AG. O sucesso da recanalização foi significativamente maior no grupo AG (OR 1,68; IC 95% 1,26­2,24; p < 0,04) em comparação com SC. No entanto, não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos para recuperação funcional adequada (OR 1,13; IC 95% 0,76­1,67; p = 0,56), incidência de pneumonia (OR 1,23; IC 95% 0,56- 2,69; p = 0,61), mortalidade em três meses (OR 0,99; IC 95% 0,73- 1,34; p = 0,95) ou hemorragia cerebral (OR 0,97; IC 95% 0,68- 1,38; p = 0,88). CONCLUSãO: Apesar do aumento significativo nas taxas de sucesso de recanalização no grupo AG, AG e SC mostram taxas semelhantes de recuperação funcional, mortalidade, pneumonia e hemorragia em pacientes com AVCI submetidos à TM.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a widely adopted scale for assessing stroke recovery. Despite limitations, the mRS has been adopted as primary outcome in most recent clinical acute stroke trials. Designed to be used by multidisciplinary clinical staff, the congruency of this scale is not consistent, which may lead to mistakes in clinical or research application. We aimed to develop and validate an interactive and automated digital tool for assessing the mRS-the iRankin. METHODS: A panel of five board-certified and mRS-trained vascular neurologists developed an automated flowchart based on current mRS literature. Two international experts were consulted on content and provided feedback on the prototype platform. The platform contained five vignettes and five real video cases, representing mRS grades 0-5. For validation, we invited neurological staff from six comprehensive stroke centers to complete an online assessment. Participants were randomized into two equal groups usual practice versus iRankin. The participants were randomly allocated in pairs for the congruency analysis. Weighted kappa (kw) and proportions were used to describe agreement. RESULTS: A total of 59 professionals completed the assessment. The kw was dramatically improved among nurses, 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.55-0.97) × 0.30 (0.07-0.67), and among vascular neurologists, 0.87 (0.72-1) × 0.82 (0.66-0.98). In the accuracy analysis, after the standard mRS values for the vignettes and videos were determined by a panel of experts, and considering each correct answer as equivalent to 1 point on a scale of 0-15, it revealed a higher mean of 10.6 (±2.2) in the iRankin group and 8.2 (±2.3) points in the control group (p = 0.02). In an adjusted analysis, the iRankin adoption was independently associated with the score of congruencies between reported and standard scores (beta coefficient = 2.22, 95% CI = 0.64-3.81, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The iRankin adoption led to a substantial or near-perfect agreement in all analyzed professional categories. More trials are needed to generalize our findings. Our user-friendly and free platform is available at https://www.irankinscale.com/.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Global access to acute stroke treatment is variable worldwide, with notable gaps in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), especially in rural areas. Ensuring a standardized method for pinpointing the existing regional coverage and proposing potential sites for new stroke centers is essential to change this scenario. AIMS: To create and apply computational strategies (CSs) to determine optimal locations for new acute stroke centers (ASCs), with a pilot application in nine Latin American regions/countries. METHODS: Hospitals treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and meeting the minimum infrastructure requirements per structured protocols were categorized as ASCs. Hospitals with emergency departments, noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) scanners, and 24/7 laboratories were identified as potential acute stroke centers (PASCs). Hospital geolocation data were collected and mapped using the OpenStreetMap data set. A 45-min drive radius was considered the ideal coverage area for each hospital based on the drive speeds from the OpenRouteService database. Population data, including demographic density, were obtained from the Kontur Population data sets. The proposed CS assessed the population covered by ASCs and proposed new ASCs or artificial points (APs) settled in densely populated areas to achieve a target population coverage (TPC) of 95%. RESULTS: The observed coverage in the region presented significant disparities, ranging from 0% in the Bahamas to 73.92% in Trinidad and Tobago. No country/region reached the 95% TPC using only its current ASCs or PASCs, leading to the proposal of APs. For example, in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, the introduction of 132 new centers was suggested. Furthermore, it was observed that most ASCs were in major urban hubs or university hospitals, leaving rural areas largely underserved. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPSTROKE project has the potential to provide a systematic approach to identify areas with limited access to stroke centers and propose solutions for increasing access to AIS treatment. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: Data used for this publication are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background After recently published randomized clinical trials, the choice of the best anesthetic procedure for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is not definite. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation (CS) in patients with AIS who underwent MT, explicitly focusing on procedural and clinical outcomes and the incidence of adverse events. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GA versus CS in patients who underwent MT due to LVO-AIS. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random effects models were used for all outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Results Eight RCTs (1,300 patients) were included, of whom 650 (50%) underwent GA. Recanalization success was significantly higher in the GA group (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.26-2.24; p < 0.04) than in CS. No significant difference between groups were found for good functional recovery (OR 1.13; IC 95% 0.76-1.67; p = 0.56), incidence of pneumonia (OR 1.23; IC 95% 0.56- 2,69; p = 0.61), three-month mortality (OR 0.99; IC 95% 0.73-1.34; p = 0.95), or cerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.97; IC 95% 0.68-1.38; p = 0.88). Conclusion Despite the increase in recanalization success rates in the GA group, GA and CS show similar rates of good functional recovery, three-month mortality, incidence of pneumonia, and cerebral hemorrhage in patients undergoing MT.

Resumo Antecedentes A trombectomia mecânica (TM) é o padrão de tratamento para pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo (AVCI) devido à oclusão de grandes vasos (OGV). No entanto, ainda não está claro qual é o procedimento anestésico mais benéfico para a TM. Objetivo Nosso objetivo foi comparar a eficácia e a segurança da anestesia geral (AG) versus sedação consciente (SC) em pacientes com AVCI submetidos à TM, focando especificamente nos resultados procedimentais e clínicos, bem como na incidência de eventos adversos. Métodos Foram realizadas buscas sistemáticas nas bases PubMed, Embase e Cochrane por ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) comparando AG versus SC em pacientes submetidos à TM devido a AVCI por OGV. Razões de chances (ORs) foram calculadas para desfechos binários, com intervalos de confiança de 95% (ICs). Modelos de efeitos aleatórios foram usados para todos os resultados. A heterogeneidade foi avaliada com estatísticas I2. Resultados Oito ensaios clínicos randomizados (1.300 pacientes) foram incluídos, dos quais 650 (50%) foram submetidos à AG. O sucesso da recanalização foi significativamente maior no grupo AG (OR 1,68; IC 95% 1,26-2,24; p < 0,04) em comparação com SC. No entanto, não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos para recuperação funcional adequada (OR 1,13; IC 95% 0,76-1,67; p = 0,56), incidência de pneumonia (OR 1,23; IC 95% 0,56- 2,69; p = 0,61), mortalidade em três meses (OR 0,99; IC 95% 0,73- 1,34; p = 0,95) ou hemorragia cerebral (OR 0,97; IC 95% 0,68- 1,38; p = 0,88). Conclusão Apesar do aumento significativo nas taxas de sucesso de recanalização no grupo AG, AG e SC mostram taxas semelhantes de recuperação funcional, mortalidade, pneumonia e hemorragia em pacientes com AVCI submetidos à TM.

RESUMO

Over the last three decades, stroke care has undergone significant transformations mainly driven by the introduction of reperfusion therapy and the organization of systems of care. Patients receiving treatment through a well-structured stroke service have a much higher chance of favorable outcomes, thereby decreasing both disability and mortality. In this article, we reviewed the scientific evidence for stroke reperfusion therapy, including thrombolysis and thrombectomy, and its implementation in the public health system in Brazil.

Nas últimas três décadas, o tratamento do AVC sofreu transformações significativas, impulsionadas principalmente pela introdução das terapias de reperfusão e pela organização dos serviços de AVC. Os pacientes que recebem tratamento em um serviço de AVC bem estruturado têm uma probabilidade muito maior de resultados favoráveis, diminuindo assim a incapacidade funcional e a mortalidade. Neste artigo, revisamos as evidências científicas para as terapias de reperfusão do AVC, incluindo trombólise e trombectomia e sua implementação no sistema público de saúde no Brasil.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Over the last three decades, stroke care has undergone significant transformations mainly driven by the introduction of reperfusion therapy and the organization of systems of care. Patients receiving treatment through a well-structured stroke service have a much higher chance of favorable outcomes, thereby decreasing both disability and mortality. In this article, we reviewed the scientific evidence for stroke reperfusion therapy, including thrombolysis and thrombectomy, and its implementation in the public health system in Brazil.

Resumo Nas últimas três décadas, o tratamento do AVC sofreu transformações significativas, impulsionadas principalmente pela introdução das terapias de reperfusão e pela organização dos serviços de AVC. Os pacientes que recebem tratamento em um serviço de AVC bem estruturado têm uma probabilidade muito maior de resultados favoráveis, diminuindo assim a incapacidade funcional e a mortalidade. Neste artigo, revisamos as evidências científicas para as terapias de reperfusão do AVC, incluindo trombólise e trombectomia e sua implementação no sistema público de saúde no Brasil.

RESUMO

Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating effect on global health, resulting in a strain on healthcare services worldwide. The faster a patient with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receives reperfusion treatment, the greater the odds of a good functional outcome. To maintain the time-dependent processes in acute stroke care, strategies to reorganize infrastructure and optimize human and medical resources were needed. Methods: Data from AIS patients who received thrombolytic therapy were prospectively assessed in the emergency department (ED) of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre from 2019 to 2021. Treatment times for each stage were measured, and the reasons for a delay in receiving thrombolytic therapy were evaluated. Results: A total of 256 patients received thrombolytic therapy during this period. Patients who arrived by the emergency medical service (EMS) had a lower median door-to-needle time (DNT). In the multivariable analysis, the independent predictors of DNT >60 min were previous atrial fibrillation (OR 7) and receiving thrombolysis in the ED (OR 9). The majority of patients had more than one reason for treatment delay. The main reasons were as follows: delay in starting the CT scan, delay in the decision-making process after the CT scan, and delay in reducing blood pressure. Several actions were implemented during the study period. The most important factor that contributed to a decrease in DNT was starting the bolus and continuous infusion of tPA on the CT scan table (decreased the median DNT from 74 to 52, DNT ≤ 60 min in 67% of patients treated at radiology service vs. 24% of patients treated in the ED). The DNT decreased from 78 min to 66 min in 2020 and 57 min in 2021 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Acute stroke care continued to be a priority despite the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of a thrombolytic bolus and the start of continuous infusion on the CT scan table was the main factor that contributed to the reduction of DNT. Continuous monitoring of service times is essential for improving the quality of the stroke center and achieving better functional outcomes for patients.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an extremely time-sensitive condition. The field triage of stroke patients should consider a careful balance between the best destination for the timely delivery of intravenous and/or endovascular reperfusion therapies. The Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) scale has been shown to have an accuracy comparable to that of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). However, it has not been tested in the field. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the FAST-ED scale in the detection of AIS due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the prehospital setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of consecutive prospective data collected from February 2017 to May 2019 in the city of Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil, correlating the prehospital FAST-ED scale scores with the hospital diagnosis of LVO. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients were included in the analysis. As compared with the diagnosis of LVO upon hospital discharge, the prehospital FAST-ED scale applied by paramedics had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 47.7%, a PPV of 51.1%, an NPV of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.55-0.80). Among the patients with a final diagnosis of AIS, the accuracy was higher, with an AUC of 0.75 (95%CI: 0.60-0.89), a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 60%, a PPV of 80%, and an NPV of 60%. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the FAST-ED scale, which was applied by paramedics in the field, demonstrated moderate accuracy but high sensitivity and NPV, which are essential attributes for a triage scale. While larger studies are still needed, these findings further support the use of the FAST-ED in stroke triage.

ANTECEDENTES: O acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico (AVCI) é uma doença altamente dependente do tempo. A triagem de pacientes com AVCI na cena deve considerar um equilíbrio cuidadoso entre o melhor destino para a administração rápida de terapias de reperfusão intravenosas e/ou endovasculares. Já foi demonstrado que a escala de Avaliação de campo de triagem de AVC para destino de emergência (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, FAST-ED, em inglês) tem precisão comparável à da Escala de AVC dos Institutos Nacionais de Saúde dos Estados Unidos (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS, em inglês). Entretanto, a FAST-ED não foi testada em campo. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a acurácia da escala FAST-ED na detecção de AVCI por oclusão de grande vaso (OGV) no contexto pré-hospitalar. MéTODOS: Estudo transversal de dados prospectivos consecutivos, coletados de fevereiro de 2017 a maio de 2019, em Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, em que se correlacionam a pontuação pré-hospitalar na escala FAST-ED e o diagnóstico hospitalar de OGV. A área sob a curva (ASC), a sensibilidade, a especificidade, o valor preditivo positivo (VPP), e o valor preditivo negativo (VPN) foram calculados. RESULTADOS: Ao todo, 74 pacientes foram incluídos na análise. Comparada ao diagnóstico de OGV na alta hospitalar, a escala FAST-ED aplicada em campo por profissionais do pré-hospitalar teve sensibilidade de 80%, especificidade de 47,7%, VPP de 51,1%, VPN de 77,8%, e ASC de 0,68 (intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 0,55­0,80). Entre pacientes com diagnóstico final de AVCI, a precisão foi mais alta, com ASC de 0,75 (IC95%: 0,60­0,89), sensibilidade de 80%, especificidade de 60%, VPP de 80%, e VPN de 60%. CONCLUSõES: Neste estudo, a escala FAST-ED, aplicada por profissionais do pré-hospitalar em campo, demonstrou precisão moderada, com alta sensibilidade e VPN, atributos essenciais para uma escala de triagem. Embora estudos com amostras maiores ainda sejam necessários, estes achados apoiam o uso da FAST-ED na triagem de AVCI.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an extremely time-sensitive condition. The field triage of stroke patients should consider a careful balance between the best destination for the timely delivery of intravenous and/or endovascular reperfusion therapies. The Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) scale has been shown to have an accuracy comparable to that of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). However, it has not been tested in the field. Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the FAST-ED scale in the detection of AIS due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the prehospital setting. Methods A cross-sectional study of consecutive prospective data collected from February 2017 to May 2019 in the city of Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil, correlating the prehospital FAST-ED scale scores with the hospital diagnosis of LVO. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results In total, 74 patients were included in the analysis. As compared with the diagnosis of LVO upon hospital discharge, the prehospital FAST-ED scale applied by paramedics had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 47.7%, a PPV of 51.1%, an NPV of 77.8%, and an AUC of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.55-0.80). Among the patients with a final diagnosis of AIS, the accuracy was higher, with an AUC of 0.75 (95%CI: 0.60-0.89), a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 60%, a PPV of 80%, and an NPV of 60%. Conclusions In the present study, the FAST-ED scale, which was applied by paramedics in the field, demonstrated moderate accuracy but high sensitivity and NPV, which are essential attributes for a triage scale. While larger studies are still needed, these findings further support the use of the FAST-ED in stroke triage.

Resumo Antecedentes O acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico (AVCI) é uma doença altamente dependente do tempo. A triagem de pacientes com AVCI na cena deve considerar um equilíbrio cuidadoso entre o melhor destino para a administração rápida de terapias de reperfusão intravenosas e/ou endovasculares.Jáfoi demonstrado que a escala deAvaliação de campo de triagem de AVC para destino de emergência (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, FAST-ED, em inglês) tem precisão comparável à da Escala de AVC dos Institutos Nacionais de Saúde dos Estados Unidos (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS, em inglês). Entretanto, a FAST-ED não foi testada em campo. Objetivo Avaliar a acurácia da escala FAST-ED na detecção de AVCI por oclusão de grande vaso (OGV) no contexto pré-hospitalar. Métodos Estudo transversal de dados prospectivos consecutivos, coletados de fevereiro de 2017 a maio de 2019, em Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, em que se correlacionam a pontuação pré-hospitalar na escala FAST-ED e o diagnóstico hospitalar de OGV. A área sob a curva (ASC), a sensibilidade, a especificidade, o valor preditivo positivo (VPP), e o valor preditivo negativo (VPN) foram calculados. Resultados Ao todo, 74 pacientes foram incluídosnaanálise. Comparada aodiagnóstico de OGV na alta hospitalar, a escala FAST-ED aplicada em campo por profissionais do préhospitalar teve sensibilidadede80%, especificidadede47,7%, VPPde51,1%, VPN de 77,8%, e ASC de 0,68 (intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 0,55-0,80). Entre pacientes com diagnóstico final de AVCI, a precisão foi mais alta, com ASC de 0,75 (IC95%: 0,60-0,89), sensibilidade de 80%, especificidade de 60%, VPP de 80%, e VPN de 60%. Conclusões Neste estudo, a escala FAST-ED, aplicada por profissionais do pré-hospitalar em campo, demonstrou precisão moderada, com alta sensibilidade e VPN, atributos essenciaispara umaescaladetriagem.Embora estudoscomamostras maiores ainda sejam necessários, estes achados apoiam o uso da FAST-ED na triagem de AVCI.