RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Maintenance of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot is fundamental during functional tasks and disorders can lead to clinical alterations. Studies have demonstrated that deficits in ankle isokinetic performance can predispose an individual to lower limb injuries. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the muscular performance of cavus, planus, and normal feet by means of torque/body mass and the isokinetic phases, to generate 3D surface map analysis, and to verify whether there is a relationship between MLA height and arch height flexibility with isokinetic performance. METHODS: The sample consisted of 105 healthy adult women, divided into three groups: normal, cavus, and planus. Assessment in concentric mode at 30, 60, and 90 °/s in the dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of the ankle joint were analyzed during the three isokinetic phases (acceleration, sustained velocity, and deceleration). The variables total range of motion, peak of torque (PT), and angle of PT were extracted within the sustained velocity. RESULTS: In dorsiflexion at 60 °/s, the phase where the velocicty is sustained (load range phase) was higher in the planus group (MeanDifference=10.9 %; ω2p = 0.06) when compared with the cavus group. Deficits in the peak torque/body mass in dorsiflexion at 60 °/s (cavus feet: MD=-3 N.m/kg; ω2p = 0.06; and planus feet: MD=-1.1 N.m/kg; ω2p = 0.06) were also observed as well as in the 3D surface maps, when compared with the normal group. The flexibility of MLA had a negative correlation of PT at 30 °/s in cavus group. The heigth of MLA had a postive correlation with the PT for the cavus and planus group ate 60 °/s. All other results did not show differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The planus groups showed a better capacity of attain and sustained the velocity in dorsiflexion in relation the cavus group. The cavus and planus group had deficts in torque in relation the normal. The correlations were weak between the measures of MLA and PT. Thereby, in general the differences between foot types showed small effect in isokinetic muscle performance measures of the plantar and dorsi flexores. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study design was approved by the IRB (#90238618.8.0000.5231).
Assuntos
Tornozelo/fisiologia , Pé Chato/fisiopatologia , Pé/fisiologia , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Pé Cavo/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Articulação do Tornozelo/fisiologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Mapeamento Potencial de Superfície Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , TorqueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Foot type classification is well recognized in clinical practice and orthopedic literature, a universally accepted classification or standardized measures to determine foot types are lacking. The objective of this study was to identify which non-radiographic assessment methods are considered valid and/or reliable for the classification of foot types. METHOD: A systematic database search was performed. Only cross-sectional studies that performed reliability and/or validity analysis of non-radiographic methods were included. To evaluate the risk of bias, the Critical Appraisal Tool (CAT) was used to evaluate the measurement properties of objective clinical methods. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. The results of reliability and validity, in general, demonstrated high scores, but, inconsistencies were related to the variability of the measurements, heterogeneity of the methods used to determine reliability and validity, and lack of parameters for classifying foot types, which resulted in few elements to determine which method of foot type evaluation is valid and reliable. CONCLUSION: Given the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and CAT results and the presence of normative values, the static measurements of the "Arch Height Index", "Foot Posture Index", and "Staheli Arch Index" can be suggested to classify foot types.
Assuntos
Pé , Postura , Estudos Transversais , Pé/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
The tools used to evaluate foot types are divergent since they adopt classic linear analyzes, based on anthropometric or image measurements, which do not dynamically contemplate the variability of foot shape. The use of newer techniques such as multiscale fractal dimension (MFD) may be a key to this type of problem. However, for these measures to be used safely and consistently, it is essential to evaluate their reliability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of MFD measurements of adult plantar pressure maps during gait, as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC90). Seventy-two subjects were included in the test-retest, with a one week interval. The plantar pressure maps were constructed using a pressure platform. The data were processed in a routine for extracting the MFD curve measurements (maximum and integral values). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient results (ICC3,k) were excellent for both measurements (maximum value 0.96, 95% confidence interval [0.93-0.97], and integral 0.95 [0.92-0.97]) with low SEM and MDC90 values below 10% of the mean. The application of MFD to the plantar pressure data generated by the pressure platform is reliable and could allow exploration of the complexity of foot shapes, enabling their classification.
Assuntos
Fractais , Marcha , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Humanos , Pressão , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
This study aimed to analyze the coordination and variability between the thorax, lumbar, and pelvis segments in runners with chronic low back pain group (LBPG) and matched control group (CG). Twenty-six recreational runners were evaluated on a treadmill at 3.3 m/s. The coordination of the pelvis-lumbar and lumbar-thorax in all three planes and between the transverse and frontal plane of the lumbar segment were evaluated using the vector coding technique. Coordination was analyzed via histograms with the percentage of each pattern and the coupling angle during the cycle. The variability coordination was calculated from the angular deviation between the cycles. Differences were observed in the coordination patterns and in the coupling angle during the cycle. Between the pelvis-lumbar in the frontal plane, the LBPG (x¯ = 50.6% (SD = 10.7)) presented more in-phase pattern than the CG (38.6% (8.7; P = 0.05). For the lumbar-thorax, differences occurred in all planes. Between the frontal-transverse plane of the lumbar segment, the LBPG (27.6% (7.9)) presented more in-phase pattern than the CG (38.6% (8.7); P = 0.02). The variability did not demonstrate the differences between the groups; these differences were observed in coordination between the lumbar and adjacent segments in all planes. The model of rigid segments and the coordination analyses were sensitive to detect these differences, and the presence of more in-phase patterns could be related to the protection mechanism in order to avoid painful movements.