Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
1.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 13(11): 2797-2815, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37794274

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition causing considerable distress. It impacts mobility, social interaction, and quality of life. In Brazil, there is a notable gap in epidemiological data and patient experiences regarding HS. METHODS: This study, spanning 2019 to 2022, employed netnography to probe the experiences of Brazilian patients with HS. This approach gleans insights from online interactions, offering a direct view into patients' lives. RESULTS: Notably, the data illuminated the challenges patients face, such as difficulties in obtaining a diagnosis and the complexities involved in managing a chronic, and often debilitating, condition. Furthermore, patients' experiences with various treatments, encompassing antibiotics, biologic agents, lifestyle alterations, surgical procedures, and alternative remedies, were also examined. CONCLUSION: By undertaking a longitudinal analysis of patient interactions, the study aimed to offer a richer understanding of HS, from its diagnosis to its treatment. It underscores the necessity for a more patient-centered approach when managing this condition. We hope that this enhanced understanding can facilitate better care for those affected by HS.

6.
J. bras. econ. saúde (Impr.) ; 12(3): 231-240, Dezembro/2020.
Artigo em Inglês | ECOS, LILACS | ID: biblio-1141311

RESUMO

Objective: To assess the cost-per-responder (CpR) of biologic therapies available in Brazil to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) from the private healthcare system's perspective. Methods: Number needed to treat (NNT) and (CpR) analyses were performed to evaluate biologic therapies' cost-effectiveness for moderate-to-severe PsO available in Brazil. The effectiveness of biologic treatments for moderate-to-severe PsO was assessed based on a previously published metanalysis, which included studies considering PsO patients and outcomes of interest (PASI 75, 90, and 100). The clinical efficacy data in terms of estimated NNT based on the network metanalysis (NMA) results were combined with drug treatment costs to determine the CpR for each treatment arm in 3-time horizons: the primary response period, 1-year, and 2-years. Results: Risankizumab was the most cost-effective option when NMA base case scenario data was used to calculate NNT in all PASI response for both the primary response period and 1- and 2-years follow-up durations. Differences in CpR between risankizumab and other biologic drugs increased with more significant PASI improvements. CpR sensitivity analysis also confirmed these findings, indicating that risankizumab has a better performance for PASI 100, and both risankizumab and guselkumab are very similar in terms of cost per additional PASI 75 and PASI 90 responder. Conclusions: Risankizumab was estimated to have a lower cost per PASI 75, 90, and 100 responders in most simulated scenarios (primary response period [12-16 weeks], 1-year and 2-years), among the evaluated biologic therapies.


Objetivo: Avaliar o custo por respondedor (CpR) das terapias biológicas disponíveis no Brasil para tratamento da psoríase em placas (PsO) moderada a grave, na perspectiva do sistema brasileiro de saúde suplementar. Métodos: Foram realizadas análises de número necessário para tratar (NNT) e CpR para avaliar o custo-efetividade das terapias biológicas para PsO moderada a grave disponíveis no Brasil. A eficácia foi avaliada por meio de dados de uma metanálise em rede (NMA), que incluiu estudos considerando pacientes com PsO moderada a grave e os desfechos de interesse (PASI 75, 90 e 100). Dados de eficácia em termos de NNT foram combinados com custos do tratamento medicamentoso para determinar o CpR para cada braço de tratamento em três horizontes temporais: período de resposta primária, 1 ano e 2 anos. Resultados: Risanquizumabe foi mais econômico quando utilizados os dados do caso-base para calcular o NNT, considerando todos os escores PASI para o período de resposta primária e em 1 e 2 anos. As diferenças no CpR entre o risanquizumabe e os outros medicamentos biológicos aumentaram com maiores ganhos de PASI. O CpR calculado pela análise de sensibilidade confirmou esses achados, indicando que risanquizumabe tem um melhor desempenho para PASI 100, e risanquizumabe e guselcumabe são muito semelhantes em termos de CpR por PASI 75 e PASI 90 adicionais. Conclusões: Risanquizumabe apresentou um custo mais baixo por respondedor PASI 75, 90 e 100 na maioria dos cenários analisados (período de resposta primária [12-16 semanas], 1 ano e 2 anos), entre as terapias biológicas avaliadas.


Assuntos
Psoríase , Produtos Biológicos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Saúde Suplementar
7.
An Bras Dermatol ; 94(2 Suppl 1): 76-107, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31166402

RESUMO

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects 1.3% of the Brazilian population. The most common clinical manifestations are erythematous, scaling lesions that affect both genders and can occur on any anatomical site, preferentially involving the knees, elbows, scalp and genitals. Besides the impact on the quality of life, the systemic nature of the disease makes psoriasis an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially in young patients with severe disease. By an initiative of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, dermatologists with renowned clinical experience in the management of psoriasis were invited to form a work group that, in a partnership with the Brazilian Medical Association, dedicated themselves to create the Plaque Psoriasis Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines. The relevant issues for the diagnosis (evaluation of severity and comorbidities) and treatment of plaque psoriasis were defined. The issues generated a search strategy in the Medline-PubMed database up to July 2018. Subsequently, the answers to the questions of the recommendations were devised, and each reference selected presented the respective level of recommendation and strength of scientific evidence. The final recommendations for making up the final text were worded by the coordinators.


Assuntos
Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/terapia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antralina/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Fototerapia/métodos , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sociedades Médicas , Fatores de Tempo , Vitamina D/análise
8.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 65(4): 493-508, 2019 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066801

RESUMO

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Etanercepte/administração & dosagem , Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 65(4): 530-534, 2019 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066805

RESUMO

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Acitretina/administração & dosagem , Acitretina/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Brasil , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
An. bras. dermatol ; 94(2,supl.1): 76-107, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011088

RESUMO

Abstract: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects 1.3% of the Brazilian population. The most common clinical manifestations are erythematous, scaling lesions that affect both genders and can occur on any anatomical site, preferentially involving the knees, elbows, scalp and genitals. Besides the impact on the quality of life, the systemic nature of the disease makes psoriasis an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially in young patients with severe disease. By an initiative of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, dermatologists with renowned clinical experience in the management of psoriasis were invited to form a work group that, in a partnership with the Brazilian Medical Association, dedicated themselves to create the Plaque Psoriasis Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines. The relevant issues for the diagnosis (evaluation of severity and comorbidities) and treatment of plaque psoriasis were defined. The issues generated a search strategy in the Medline-PubMed database up to July 2018. Subsequently, the answers to the questions of the recommendations were devised, and each reference selected presented the respective level of recommendation and strength of scientific evidence. The final recommendations for making up the final text were worded by the coordinators.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/terapia , Fototerapia/métodos , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Fatores de Tempo , Vitamina D/análise , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Brasil , Comorbidade , Antralina/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Dermatologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Inibidores de Calcineurina/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA