RESUMO
[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To (i) ascertain stakeholders’ perceptions of the contextual factors and resources necessary to successfully implement the AMORE platform, a tool that provides accessibility assessments for health care services, considering factors such travel time and traffic conditions, and (ii) identify potential barriers to and facilitators for enhancing spatial accessibility to health care services within the Colombian urban context. Methods. In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of seven key stakeholders. The sample was drawn from individuals involved in development of policies in Colombia, service providers, and users, among others, who had expertise in the field. Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. Results. The participants had positive views on the appearance of the AMORE platform, highlighting its user-friendly visualization. Suggestions were made about the variables used in the dashboard, the implementation of the platform, potential usage areas, and barriers and facilitators to implementation and use. Barriers included economic, political, and personnel challenges, while facilitators included creating a minimum viable product at a low cost and building interinstitutional and international cooperation. Conclusions. Innovations such as the AMORE platform have the potential to support decision-making processes across various sectors, including public policies and internal processes within private organizations, academia, and the community. However, implementing such a tool has financial, contextual and environmental challenges. The study identified key factors that were considered prerequisites for successfully implementing the AMORE platform in Colombian cities.
[RESUMEN]. Objetivos. i) Determinar las percepciones de las partes interesadas sobre los factores contextuales y los recursos necesarios para implementar con éxito la plataforma AMORE, una herramienta que proporciona evaluaciones de accesibilidad para los servicios de atención de salud, teniendo en cuenta factores como el tiempo de desplazamiento y el estado del tráfico; y ii) determinar los posibles factores que obstaculizan o favorecen las mejoras en la accesibilidad espacial a los servicios de atención de salud en el contexto urbano en Colombia. Métodos. En este estudio cualitativo, se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas en una muestra intencional de siete partes interesadas. La muestra se obtuvo a partir de responsables del diseño de políticas en Colombia, prestadores de servicios y usuarios, entre otras personas, con conocimientos en la materia. Las entrevistas se llevaron a cabo hasta llegar al punto de saturación. Resultados. Los participantes tenían una opinión favorable sobre el aspecto de la plataforma AMORE, de la que resaltaban su fácil visualización. Se formularon sugerencias sobre las variables utilizadas en el panel de información, la implementación de la plataforma, las posibles áreas de uso y los elementos que podrían obstaculizar o favorecer su implementación y uso. Los obstáculos incluían desafíos económicos, políticos y de personal, mientras que entre los elementos facilitadores estaban la creación de un producto mínimo viable a bajo costo y el establecimiento de lazos de cooperación interinstitucional e internacional. Conclusiones. Innovaciones como la plataforma AMORE tienen el potencial de brindar apoyo para los procesos de toma de decisiones en diversos sectores, como las políticas públicas y los procesos internos en las organizaciones privadas, el sector académico y la comunidad. Sin embargo, la implementación de una herramienta de este tipo plantea desafíos económicos, contextuales y ambientales. El estudio determinó los factores clave que se consideran requisitos previos para implementar con éxito la plataforma AMORE en las ciudades colombianas.
[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Os objetivos do estudo foram: i) avaliar as percepções das partes interessadas sobre os fatores contextuais e os recursos necessários para implementação bem-sucedida da plataforma AMORE, uma ferramenta que fornece avaliações sobre a acessibilidade dos serviços de saúde considerando fatores como tempo de deslocamento e condições de trânsito; e ii) identificar possíveis barreiras e facilitadores para melhorar a acessibilidade espacial a serviços de saúde no contexto urbano da Colômbia. Métodos. Neste estudo qualitativo, foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com uma amostra intencional de sete partes interessadas principais. A amostra foi composta por indivíduos envolvidos na elaboração de políticas na Colômbia, prestadores de serviços e usuários, entre outros, que tinham conhecimento especializado na área. As entrevistas foram realizadas até se alcançar a saturação. Resultados. Os participantes tiveram opiniões positivas sobre a aparência da plataforma AMORE, destacando a visualização fácil de usar. Foram feitas sugestões sobre as variáveis usadas no painel, a implementação da plataforma, potenciais áreas de uso e barreiras e facilitadores para sua implementação e utilização. As barreiras englobavam dificuldades econômicas, políticas e relacionadas ao pessoal. Já os facilitadores incluíam a criação de um produto mínimo viável de baixo custo e o desenvolvimento de cooperação interinstitucional e internacional. Conclusões. Inovações como a plataforma AMORE têm o potencial de apoiar processos decisórios em vários setores, incluindo políticas públicas e processos internos em organizações privadas, no meio acadêmico e na comunidade. No entanto, a implementação dessa ferramenta envolve desafios financeiros, contextuais e ambientais. O estudo identificou os principais fatores que foram considerados pré-requisitos para o sucesso da implementação da plataforma AMORE em cidades colombianas.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Planejamento de Cidades , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Colômbia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Planejamento de Cidades , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Planejamento de Cidades , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , ColômbiaRESUMO
Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es analizar las políticas públicas e intervenciones (PPI) a nivel nacional vigentes a 2022 para la prevención del exceso de peso (sobrepeso y obesidad) en población adulta de México, desde una perspectiva interseccional. Se realizó un análisis documental de las estrategias para prevenir el exceso de peso en México en la adultez. Los documentos fueron analizados aplicando una metodología para el análisis de políticas basado en la interseccionalidad. Un total de 9 PPI fueron analizadas. En el diseño de las mismas operan alcances variables para visibilizar una perspectiva interseccional. En la definición del problema identificamos dos tendencias principales: una tendencia reduccionista y una tendencia holística. Ambas se combinan de manera variable en las PPI, evidenciando contradicciones internas en su diseño. La mayoría de las PPI señalan pocos ejes de desigualdad social, y como aditivos más que interseccionales. Las PPI consideran las desigualdades sociales mayormente en la definición del problema y, en mucho menor medida, en las soluciones y en los procesos de consulta y negociación. La consideración de la naturaleza interseccional de la problemática del exceso de peso en las PPI es importante para abordar la epidémica desigualdad del exceso de peso.
Abstract The scope of this article is to analyze public policies and interventions (PPI) prevailing in 2022 at the national level for the prevention of excess weight (overweight and obesity) in the adult population of Mexico, from an intersectional perspective. We performed documental analysis of PPI to prevent excess weight in Mexico in adulthood by applying a methodology for policy analysis based on intersectionality (Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework). A total of nine PPI were analyzed. The extent to which the PPI design considers an intersectional perspective is heterogeneous in the documents analyzed. In the definition of the problem, we identified two main tendencies, namely reductionist and holistic. Both are combined in a variable way in the PPI, revealing internal contradictions in their design. Most PPI consider relatively few cases of social inequality, and as an additive rather than an intersectional consideration. Overall, the PPI consider social inequalities predominantly in the definition of the problem and, to a far lesser extent, in the proposed solutions and in the consultation and negotiation processes. The consideration of the intersectional nature of the problem of excess weight in PPI is important to address the unequal epidemic of excess weight.
RESUMO
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported a typesetting error in Table 1 that caused the columns of the table to be ordered incorrectly, and a typographical error in a sentence in the Conclusions section.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mortality registries are an essential data source for public health surveillance and for planning and evaluating public policy. Nevertheless, there are still large inequalities in the completeness and quality of mortality registries between and within countries. In Ecuador, there have been few nationwide evaluations of the mortality registry and no evaluations of inequalities between provinces. This kind of analysis is fundamental for strengthening the vital statistics system. METHODS: Ecological study assessing the completeness, quality and internal consistency of mortality data in the provinces of Ecuador, using 13 years of mortality data (2001-2013). Completeness was assessed using three types of death distribution methods (DDMs), quality by estimating the percentages of garbage codes and deaths with unspecified age or sex in the registered deaths, and internal consistency by estimating the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age-sex combinations. Finally, we propose a classification of the mortality registry in the studied areas based on completeness and quality. RESULTS: Completeness estimates (mean of the three methods used) in the provinces ranged from 21 to 87% in women and from 35 to 89% in men. The percentage of garbage codes in the provinces ranged from 21 to 56% in women and from 25 to 52% in men. Garbage coding was higher in women and in older age groups. The percentage of deaths with unspecified age or sex, and the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age-sex combinations was low in all the studied areas. The mortality registry could only be classified as acceptable in one area for men and one area for women. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial inequalities by sex, geographical areas and age in the completeness and quality of the mortality registry of Ecuador. The findings of this study will be helpful to direct measures to improve Ecuador's vital statistics system and to generate strategies to reduce bias when using mortality data to analyse health inequalities in the country.