RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations made with two different glass-ionomer cements (GICs) in permanent teeth using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Material and methods: A total of 60 restorations were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two dentists using standard ART procedures. The restorations were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cavities were filled with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar-3M ESPE) and 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Two calibrated independent examiners carried out the evaluation according to ART criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using multiple logistic regression models to evaluate the variables associated with the success (GIC, operator, Class type). The 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for success were based on the binomial distribution. A difference was statistically significant if p < 0.05. Results: In a 3-year follow-up, 57 restorations were evaluated. In the Ketac Molar group, 3 restorations were not evaluated, 21 were considered successful and 6 unsuccessful. In the Fuji VIII group, 28 restorations were considered successful and 2 unsuccessful. The logistic regression model showed that the combination of the variables was only statistically significant in relation to survival of ART restorations (p = 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups taking each variable into account. The best performance included the combination: Fuji VIII, operator B and Class I involving two or more tooth surfaces. Conclusion: The clinical performance of the multiplesurface ART restorations of both materials was considered satisfactory with a high success rate after 3 years.

Objetivo: Avaliar o comportamento clínico de restaurações de superfícies múltiplas, realizadas com dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro (CIVs) em dentes permanentes, utilizando-se o Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART). Material e Métodos: 60 restaurações foram realizadas em escolares (idade entre 9 - 16 anos) por dois dentistas utilizando-se os procedimentos convencionais do AR. As restaurações foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Trinta cavidades foram restauradas com CIV de alta viscosidade (Ketac Molar - 3M ESPE) e 30, com CIV modificado por resina (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Dois avaliadores calibrados e independentes realizaram a avaliação segundo os critérios do ART. Os resultados foram submetidos à análise estatística utilizando-se modelos de regressão logística múltipla, avaliando-se o sucesso em função das variáveis associadas (CIV, operador e tipo de cavidade). Intervalos de confiança de 95% para o sucesso foram baseados na distribuição binomial. Diferenças estatisticamente significantes ocorreram se p < 0,05. Resultados: Em 3 anos de acompanhamento 57 restaurações foram avaliadas. No grupo do Ketac Molar, 3 restaurações não foram avaliadas, 21 obtiveram sucesso e 6 falharam. No grupo do Fuji VIII, 28 restaurações obtiveram sucesso e 2 falharam. A combinação de variáveis foi somente significante em relação à sobrevida das restaurações (p = 0,036). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos considerando-se cada variável independentemente. A combinação apresentando melhor desempenho foi: Fuji VIII, operador B e Classe I envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies dentárias. Conclusão: O desempenho clínico de restaurações de ART de superfícies múltiplas foi considerado satisfatório para ambos os materiais testados, apresentando altos índices de sucesso após três anos.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Production of acids such as lactic acid contributes to establish a cariogenic environment that leads to dental substrate demineralization. Fluoride plays an important role in this case and, as fluoride-releasing materials, glass-ionomer cements are expected to contribute to minimize deleterious reactions. This study evaluated interactions of glass-ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART-GICs) with an aqueous lactic acid solution, testing the null hypotheses that no changes occur in the pH of the solution or on the surface roughness and mass of the ART-GICs when exposed to lactic acid solution over a 6-week period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ketac Molar, Fuji IX, Vitro Molar and Magic Glass were tested, and compared to Filtek Z250 and Ketac Fil Plus as control groups. Six specimens of each material were made according to manufacturers' instructions. The pH of the solution and roughness and mass changes of each specimen were determined over 6 weeks. Each specimen was individually stored in 2 mL of 0.02 M lactic acid solution for 1 week, renewing the solution every week. pH of solution and mass of the specimens were monitored weekly, and surface roughness of the specimens was assessed before and at the end of the 6-week acid challenge. pH and mass data were analyzed statistically by repeated measures using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests for each material. Paired t-tests were used for roughness analysis. Tukey's post-hoc tests were applied to verify differences of final roughness among the materials. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: The null hypotheses were partially rejected. All materials were able to increase the pH of the lactic acid solution and presented rougher surfaces after immersion, while mass change was minimal and generally not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can be helpful to predict the performance of these materials under clinical conditions. A protective action against the carious process with significant surface damage due to erosion may be expected.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Production of acids such as lactic acid contributes to establish a cariogenic environment that leads to dental substrate demineralization. Fluoride plays an important role in this case and, as fluoride-releasing materials, glass-ionomer cements are expected to contribute to minimize deleterious reactions. This study evaluated interactions of glass-ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART-GICs) with an aqueous lactic acid solution, testing the null hypotheses that no changes occur in the pH of the solution or on the surface roughness and mass of the ART-GICs when exposed to lactic acid solution over a 6-week period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ketac Molar, Fuji IX, Vitro Molar and Magic Glass were tested, and compared to Filtek Z250 and Ketac Fil Plus as control groups. Six specimens of each material were made according to manufacturers' instructions. The pH of the solution and roughness and mass changes of each specimen were determined over 6 weeks. Each specimen was individually stored in 2 mL of 0.02 M lactic acid solution for 1 week, renewing the solution every week. pH of solution and mass of the specimens were monitored weekly, and surface roughness of the specimens was assessed before and at the end of the 6-week acid challenge. pH and mass data were analyzed statistically by repeated measures using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests for each material. Paired t-tests were used for roughness analysis. Tukey's post-hoc tests were applied to verify differences of final roughness among the materials. Significance level was set at 5 percent. RESULTS: The null hypotheses were partially rejected. All materials were able to increase the pH of the lactic acid solution and presented rougher surfaces after immersion, while mass change was minimal and generally not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can be helpful to predict the performance of these materials under clinical conditions. A ...

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microhardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) photoactivated with a blue light-emitting diode (LED) curing light. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty specimens were distributed in 3 groups: Fuji II LC Improved/GC (RM1), Vitremer/3M ESPE (RM2) and Filtek Z250/ 3M ESPE (RM3). Two commercial light-curing units were used to polymerize the materials: LED/Ultrablue IS and a halogen light/XL3000 (QTH). After 24 h, Knoop microhardness test was performed. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: At the top surface, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in the microhardness was seen when the LED and QTH lights were used for all materials. At the bottom surface, microhardness mean value of RM2 was significantly higher when the QTH light was used (p<0.05). For RM1, statistically significant higher values (p<0.05) were seen when the LED light was used. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was seen at the bottom surface for RM3, irrespective of the light used. Top-to-bottom surface comparison showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for both RMGICs, regardless of the light used. For RM3, microhardness mean value at the top was significantly higher (p<0.05) than bottom microhardness when both curing units were used. CONCLUSION: The microhardness values seen when a LED light was used varied depending on the restorative material tested.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microhardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) photoactivated with a blue light-emitting diode (LED) curing light. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty specimens were distributed in 3 groups: Fuji II LC Improved/GC (RM1), Vitremer/3M ESPE (RM2) and Filtek Z250/3M ESPE (RM3). Two commercial light-curing units were used to polymerize the materials: LED/Ultrablue IS and a halogen light/XL3000 (QTH). After 24 h, Knoop microhardness test was performed. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: At the top surface, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in the microhardness was seen when the LED and QTH lights were used for all materials. At the bottom surface, microhardness mean value of RM2 was significantly higher when the QTH light was used (p<0.05). For RM1, statistically significant higher values (p<0.05) were seen when the LED light was used. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was seen at the bottom surface for RM3, irrespective of the light used. Top-to-bottom surface comparison showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for both RMGICs, regardless of the light used. For RM3, microhardness mean value at the top was significantly higher (p<0.05) than bottom microhardness when both curing units were used. CONCLUSION: The microhardness values seen when a LED light was used varied depending on the restorative material tested.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare water sorption (WS) and solubility (WSB) of different dentin bonding agents (DBA) as regards classification and light-activation system. The null hypotheses were: (1) there is no difference among DBA with respect to water sorption and solubility; (2) there is no effect of light-curing source on water sorption and solubility of DBA. METHODS: The tested materials were: three-step etch-and-rinse (ScotchBond multi-purpose and Heliobond-control groups), two-step etch-and-rinse (Excite, Adper Single Bond, Adper Single Bond 2), self-etching (Adhse) and all-in-one (Xeno III) systems. For each material, six specimens were prepared (0.8mmx5.5mm) for each light-activation device: halogen lamp (control) or light-emitting diodes (LED). They were transferred to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained (m(1)), subsequently immersed in deionized water until no alteration was obtained (m(2)). Following, the specimens were reconditioned to constant mass in desiccators (m(3)). The volume (V) of each specimen was calculated (mm(3)). WS and WSB were determined using the equations (m(2)-m(3)/V) and (m(3)-m(1)/V), respectively. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (p<0.05). The influence of photo-activation units was analyzed by t-test. RESULTS: Higher values of WS and WSB were observed for the two-step etch-and-rinse and all-in-one systems. The employed light-activation unit also affected the tested characteristics. Thus, the anticipated null hypotheses were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified systems were more susceptible to water adverse and they may become more prone to degradation over time regardless of the type of light-activation source.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The Light Emitting Diodes (LED) technology has been used to photoactivate composite resins and there is a great number of published studies in this area. However, there are no studies regarding resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC), which also need photoactivation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate water sorption of two RMGIC photoactivated with LED and to compare this property to that obtained with a halogen light curing unit. A resin composite was used as control. Five specimens of 15.0 mm in diameter x 1.0 mm in height were prepared for each combination of material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer, and Filtek Z250) and curing unit (Radii and Optilight Plus) and transferred to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained. Then the specimens were immersed into deionized water for 7 days, weighed and reconditioned to a constant mass in desiccators. Water sorption was calculated based on weight and volume of specimens. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Specimens photocured with LED presented significantly more water sorption than those photocured with halogen light. The RMGIC absorbed statistically significant more water than the resin composite. The type of light curing unit affected water sorption characteristics of the RMGIC.

A tecnologia baseada em Diodos emissores de luz (LED) tem sido utilizada para a fotoativação de resinas compostas e existe um grande número de estudos publicados a este respeito. Entretanto, não existem estudos envolvendo cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina (CIVMR), que também necessitam fotoativação. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi o de avaliar a sorção de água de dois CIVMR fotoativados com LED e comparar essa propriedade com aquela obtida com unidade com lâmpada halógena. Uma resina composta foi utilizada como controle. Cinco espécimes com 15,0 mm diâmetro x 1,0 mm de altura foram preparados para cada combinação de material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer e Filtek Z250) e fonte de luz (Radii e Optilight Plus) e transferidos a dessecadores até a obtenção de massa constante. Em seguida, os espécimes foram imersos em água deionizada por 7 dias, pesados e recondicionados a uma massa constante em dessecadores. A sorção de água foi calculada com base no peso e no volume dos espécimes. Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA a dois critérios e teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Os espécimes fotoativados com LED apresentaram maior sorção de água que os fotoativados com lâmpada halógena. Os CIVMR absorveram mais água que a resina composta. O tipo de unidade de fotoativação afetou as características de sorção de água dos CIVMR.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Esse estudo testa a hipótese de que não há influência do tipo de unidade fotoativadora (LED ou QTH) na microinfiltração de restaurações classe II de diferentes resinas compostas, realizadas em dentes bovinos. Materiais e Métodos: 20 incisivos bovinos foram selecionados e cavidades classe II foram confeccionadas nas faces proximais de cada dente, totalizando 40 preparos. Os espécimes foram divididos em dois grupos de 10 dentes cada (grupos L e H). No grupo L, as 10 cavidades mesiais foram restauradas com o sistema Single Bond / Z100 (3M) e as 10 cavidades distais foram restauradas com Single Bond / Definite (Degussa) e foram fotopolimerizadas com o LED (Ultraled - Dabi-Atlante). No grupo H os procedimentos restauradores foram similares aos do grupo L, porém os espécimes foram fotopolimerizados com a fonte de luz convencional (Curing light 2500 - 3M). Os dentes foram, então, armazenados em água (37°C) e submetidos à termoreciclagem (5-55°C, 1 min, 500 ciclos). Posteriormente, foram imersos em fucsina básica por 3h, lavados pelo mesmo tempo e seccionados no sentido mesiodistal. A seção com maior extensão de infiltração correspondente a cada resina (mesial e distal) foi selecioanda por meio de lentes de 10X de aumento, avaliadas por três examinadores e a infiltração determinada por escores de 0 a 3. Resultados: Os preparos restaurados com o sistema SB/Definite mostraram maior grau de infiltração comparado ao SB/Z100 e não houve influência da fonte de luz empregada. Conclusão: As cavidades restauradas com ambos os sistemas não foram afetados pela fonte de luz. As restaurações SB/Z100 mostraram menor infiltração em relação ao SB/Definite

Assuntos

RESUMO

Facetas diretas em resina composta têm se tornado um recurso bastante popular na busca por um sorriso harmonioso. Os avanços recentes marcados pelas técnicas adesivas, evolução na qualidade das resinas compostas e o desenvolvimento de pinos intra-radiculares de fibra de vidro possibilitam alcançar um resultado estético excelente, com conservação maior da estrutura dental em relação a outras técnicas. Este trabalho aborda um caso clínico dos dentes 11, 12 e 21 com severa alteração de cor, forma e posição, no qual a utilização destes procedimentos recuperou o sorriso e a auto-estima do paciente

Assuntos

RESUMO

The Light Emitting Diodes (LED) technology has been used to photoactivate composite resins and there is a great number of published studies in this area. However, there are no studies regarding resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGIC), which also need photoactivation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate water sorption of two RMGIC photoactivated with LED and to compare this property to that obtained with a halogen light curing unit. A resin composite was used as control. Five specimens of 15.0 mm in diameter x 1.0 mm in height were prepared for each combination of material (Fuji II LC Improved, Vitremer, and Filtek Z250) and curing unit (Radii and Optilight Plus) and transferred to desiccators until a constant mass was obtained. Then the specimens were immersed into deionized water for 7 days, weighed and reconditioned to a constant mass in desiccators. Water sorption was calculated based on weight and volume of specimens. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Specimens photocured with LED presented significantly more water sorption than those photocured with halogen light. The RMGIC absorbed statistically significant more water than the resin composite. The type of light curing unit affected water sorption characteristics of the RMGIC.

Assuntos