Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(12): 914-920, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31718206

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: PI-IBS prevalence is around 10.1%-14.5% ≥ 12 months after infectious gastroenteritis in North America, Europe and Asia. However, there are no studies from Latin America. Two previous studies in Mexico suggest a low incidence of 5%. AIMS: to determine the prevalence of PI-IBS in patients attended in a tertiary-care center, as well as IBS subtypes, severity, other digestive symptoms and red flags vs nPI-IBS. METHODS: seventy IBS patients screened for immunological research completed the Rome III, Spiller's for PI-IBS and IBS-SSS questionnaires. PI-IBS prevalence was determined according to three criteria sets. C1: ≥ 2 episodes of sudden onset, onset while traveling, initial illness with any of the following symptoms, fever, vomiting, bloody diarrhea and a positive stool culture. C2: sudden onset and > 2 episodes of fever, diarrhea, vomiting and bloody diarrhea. C3: sudden onset after an infectious episode such as a positive culture or onset with ≥ 2 episodes of fever, vomiting, diarrhea, rectal bleeding and foreign travel. Items were dichotomized as present or absent and compared using the Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: PI-IBS prevalence was as follows. C1: 5.7%, C2: 0 and C3: 1.4%. There were no IBS-C or IBS-M cases. In the C1 group, one case was mild and three were moderate IBS, which was similar to the non PI-IBS group. One case in the C3 group had mild IBS. There were no differences in the frequency of esophageal, gastroduodenal, anorectal, bloating/distension and red flags between PI-IBS and non PI-IBS groups (analyzed only for C3). CONCLUSIONS: in Mexico, there is a very low prevalence of PI-IBS in patients from a tertiary-referral center. However, it varies according to the surrogate-criteria used. The later needs to be taken into account when performing PI-IBS studies.


Assuntos
Infecções Intra-Abdominais/complicações , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Adulto , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/etiologia , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/etiologia , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Doença Relacionada a Viagens , Vômito/epidemiologia , Vômito/etiologia
2.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 23(2): 281-288, 2017 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28044051

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Abnormal immune regulation and increased intestinal permeability augmenting the passage of bacterial molecules that can activate immune cells, such as monocytes/macrophages, have been reported in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim was to compare the maturation phenotype of monocytes/macrophages (CD14+) from IBS patients and controls in the presence or absence of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharides (LPS), in vitro. METHODS: Mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood of 20 Rome II-IBS patients and 19 controls and cultured with or without LPS for 72 hours. The maturation phenotype was examined by flow cytometry as follows: M1-Early (CD11c+CD206-), M2-Advanced (CD11c-CD206+CX3CR1+); expression of membrane markers was reported as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). The Mann-Whitney test was used and significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: In CD14+ cells, CD11c expression decreased with vs without LPS both in IBS (MFI: 8766.0 ± 730.2 vs 12 920.0 ± 949.2, P < 0.001) and controls (8233.0 ± 613.9 vs 13 750.0 ± 743.3, P < 0.001). M1-Early cells without LPS, showed lower CD11c expression in IBS than controls (MFI: 11 540.0 ± 537.5 vs 13 860.0 ± 893.7, P = 0.040), while both groups showed less CD11c in response to LPS (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the percentage of "Intermediate" (CD11c+CD206+CX3CR1+) cells without LPS, was higher in IBS than controls (IBS = 9.5 ± 1.5% vs C = 4.9 ± 1.4%, P < 0.001). Finally, fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) expression on M2-Advanced cells was increased when treated with LPS in controls but not in IBS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial phase of monocyte/macrophage maturation appears to be more advanced in IBS compared to controls. However, the decreased CX3CR1 in patients with IBS, compared to controls, when stimulated with LPS suggests a state of immune activation in IBS.

3.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex ; 76(2): 141-54, 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724490

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are multiple therapeutic options for the management of constipation, from lifestyle modifications to the use of laxatives and in extreme cases surgery. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To establish the clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation in Mexico we conducted a review of the literature regarding medical and surgical treatments for chronic constipation and have made recommendations based on evidence. RESULTS: Low water consumption, physical inactivity and low intake of fiber are conditions associated with chronic constipation, but the evidence to prove these associations is scarce. Bolus forming agents are useful in the management of constipation with normal colonic transit and defecation without dissynergia. Evidence supports the use of lactulose (IB) and polyethylene glycol (IA) as the most safe and effective agents in the long term in adults. The use of stimulant laxatives (docusate, picosulfate, senna) is recommended only for short periods. Tegaserod is an agonist of 5-HT4 receptors and there are many clinical trials supporting its effectiveness in the management of functional constipation (IA). However "their cardiovascular safety has been questioned recently. Biofeedback therapy is the gold standard in the management of constipation associated with pelvic floor dyssynergia. Surgical treatment is reserved for extreme cases of colonic inertia. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of constipation should be based on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the selection of drugs must be made according to the scientific evidence.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Doença Crônica , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Constipação Intestinal/cirurgia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Retroalimentação Fisiológica , Humanos , Laxantes/uso terapêutico , Estilo de Vida , México
4.
Cir Cir ; 79(2): 149-55, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21631976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ostomized patients usually have some concerns such as absence of sphincter control, noisy bowel movements, changes in passage of gas, social discomfort due to odors, concerns about bag filling, peristomal and skin irritation as well as psychological changes such as body image distortion, among others, that will determine quality of life. We undertook this study to measure quality of life in ostomized patients attending the Coloproctology Unit in Hospital General de México. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional descriptive study from January 1, 2009 to May 29, 2009 in ostomized patients. Two scales were used to determine quality of life. The first was quality of life SF-36 (version 2) with 36 items that measured eight aspects. The other scale used was the Montreux scale. RESULTS: For the Montreux scale, quality of life section, a range between 60.8 and 81.2 points was obtained. The results obtained with the quality of life scale SF36 were as follows: physical function, 67.04; physical role, 56.06; physical pain, 68.28; general health, 57.16; with an overall average of 62.14 points. For mental aspects, results were as follows: vitality, 68.37; social function, 71.53; emotional role, 71.48; and mental health, 68.67; with an overall average of 70.01 points. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life of subjects included was classified as good. Fear of stoma leaks and sexual function were the aspects that most affected the patients, and those are responsible for a decrease in quality of life in this study.


Assuntos
Colostomia/psicologia , Ileostomia/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Diverticulose Cólica/psicologia , Diverticulose Cólica/cirurgia , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/psicologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/psicologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/psicologia , Autocuidado , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 105(4): 925-32, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20179693

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), constipation, and bloating are more prevalent in women than men, but gender differences associated with dyspepsia are inconsistent.The aim of this study was to determine gender differences in the prevalence of symptoms diagnostic for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in subjects with IBS and dyspepsia, as well as in controls in Mexico. METHODS: A database of 1,021 subjects (61% women) who completed the Rome II Modular Questionnaire (RIIMQ) in Spanish Mexico was analyzed. Gender differences in the frequency of all symptoms included in the RIIMQ between those fulfilling criteria for IBS (28.9%), dyspepsia (4.0%) and controls without any FGIDs (38.2%) were studied. Subjects fulfilling criteria only for other FGIDs were excluded. RESULTS: There were higher proportions of women with IBS (67.8%) and dyspepsia (85.4%) compared with the control group (55.9%) (P<0.001). In IBS, women more frequently reported changes in the number of bowel movements (BMs) associated with the onset of abdominal discomfort/pain, fewer than three BMs/week and abdominal fullness/bloating/swelling than men. Men with IBS more frequently reported swallowing air to belch and abdominal pain that improved after a BM than women. In controls, burping and hard or lumpy stools were both more frequent in men. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, gender differences in FGIDs exist, with both IBS and dyspepsia being more common in women than men. In IBS, symptoms related to constipation and bloating were more common in women, but the dyspepsia group was too small to draw any conclusions. Finally, this is the first study to report that belching is more common in men than women controls not fulfilling criteria for any FGID.


Assuntos
Dispepsia/fisiopatologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Cir Cir ; 75(5): 343-9, 2007.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18158880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enterovesical fistula, also known as vesicoenteric fistula, is an abnormal communication of the vesical bladder with a segment of the digestive tract. We undertook this study to describe diagnostic and therapeutic methods to treat colovesical fistula (CVF) in patients who attended the Coloproctology Unit of the Gastroenterology Service of the General Hospital in Mexico City. METHODS: This is a descriptive study in CVF patients carried out from January 2001 to June 2006; descriptive statistics were used for analysis of information. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified (10 males and 1 female). Average age was 54.72 years (range: 39-73 years). Time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was on average 11.9 months. The most frequent signs and symptoms were fecaluria, pneumaturia, dysuria, hematuria and chronic abdominal pain in hypogastric and left iliac regions. Nine patients were submitted to sigmoidectomy and primary colorectal anastomosis. Hartmann procedure was carried out in one patient with restoration of intestinal transit 6 weeks later. In one patient, a loop colostomy was built as a first operation, with sigmoidectomy with fistula resection as a second operation, and restoration of intestinal transit as the third. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is the only treatment that assures cure and avoids relapses. Sigmoidectomy and primary anastomosis must be considered as the treatment of choice. Mortality, although low, continues being a negative factor when surgery is indicated in these patients.


Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Fístula Intestinal/diagnóstico , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Fístula da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Fístula da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças do Colo/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fístula da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA