RESUMO
The DESIRE Study (MTN-035) explored product preference among three placebo rectal microbicide (RM) formulations, a rectal douche (RD), a suppository, and an insert, among 210 sexually active transgender people and men who have sex with men in five counties: the United States, Peru, Thailand, South Africa, and Malawi. Participants used each product prior to receptive anal sex (RAS) for 1 month, following a randomly assigned sequence, then selected their preferred product via computer assisted self-interview. In-depth interviews examined reasons for preference. We compared product preference and prior product use by country to explore whether geographic location and experience with the similar products impacted preference. A majority in the United States (56%) and Peru (58%) and nearly half in South Africa (48%) preferred the douche. Most in Malawi (59%) preferred the suppository, while half in Thailand (50%) and nearly half in South Africa (47%) preferred the insert. Participants who preferred the douche described it as quick and easy, already routinized, and serving a dual purpose of cleansing and protecting. Those who preferred the insert found it small, portable, discreet, with quick dissolution. Those who preferred the suppository found the size and shape acceptable and liked the added lubrication it provided. Experience with product use varied by country. Participants with RD experience were significantly more likely to prefer the douche (p = 0.03). Diversifying availability of multiple RM dosage forms can increase uptake and improve HIV prevention efforts globally.
RESUMEN: El estudio DESIRE (MTN-035) exploró la preferencia de producto entre tres formulaciones de microbicida rectal (MR) de placebo, una ducha rectal, un supositorio y un inserto, entre 210 personas transgénero y hombres que tienen sexo con hombres en cinco países: los Estados Unidos, Perú., Tailandia, Sudáfrica y Malawi. Los participantes utilizaron cada producto antes del sexo anal receptive (SAR) durante un mes, siguiendo una secuencia asignada al azar, luego seleccionaron su producto preferido mediante una autoentrevista asistida por computadora. Las entrevistas en profundidad examinaron los motivos de preferencia. Comparamos la preferencia de producto y el uso previo del producto por país para explorar si la ubicación geográfica y la experiencia con la forma farmacéutica impactaron la preferencia. Una mayoría en los Estados Unidos (56%) y Perú (58%) y casi la mitad en Sudáfrica (48%) prefirieron la ducha rectal. La mayoría en Malawi (59%) prefirió el supositorio, mientras que la mitad en Tailandia (50%) y casi la mitad en Sudáfrica (47%) prefirió el inserto. Los participantes que prefirieron la ducha rectal la describieron como rápida y fácil, ya parte de su rutina y que tenía el doble propósito de limpiar y proteger. Los que prefirieron el inserto lo consideraron pequeño, portátil, discreto y de rápida disolución. Los que prefirieron el supositorio encontraron que tenía un tamaño y forma aceptables y proveía lubricación adicional. La experiencia con el uso del producto varió según el país. Los participantes con experiencia con duchas rectales tenían significativamente más probabilidades de preferir la ducha rectal (p = 0,03). Diversificar la disponibilidad de múltiples formas farmacéuticas de MR puede aumentar la aceptación y mejorar los esfuerzos de prevención del VIH a nivel mundial.
Assuntos
Administração Retal , Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Humanos , Masculino , Tailândia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Malaui , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , África do Sul , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Supositórios , Adolescente , Peru , Preferência do Paciente , Comportamento Sexual , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Formas de DosagemRESUMO
HIV pre-exposure prophyalxis (PrEP) might lead individuals to view serodisclosure as unnecessary. We examined the prevalence of non-disclosure and lack of knowledge of partner status in a global cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) enrolled in the iPrEx Open Label Extension (OLE). We calculated prevalence ratios by fitting a logistic model and estimating predicted probabilities using marginal standardization. Prevalence of non-disclosure and lack of knowledge of partner status were highest in Thailand (73% and 74%, respectively) and lowest in the USA (23% and 37%, respectively). In adjusted analyses, PrEP use was not significantly associated with non-disclosure or lack of knowledge of partner status (p-values>0.05). We found that relationship characteristics were significantly associated with both outcomes. Non-disclosure was higher among casual (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.54, [95% confidence interval 1.24-1.84]) and transactional sex partners (aPR 2.03, [1.44-2.62]), and among partners whom participants have known only minutes or hours before their first sexual encounter (aPR 1.62, [1.33-1.92]). Similarly, participants were less likely to know the HIV status of casual partners (aPR 1.50, [1.30-1.71]), transactional sex partners (aPR 1.62, [1.30-1.95]), and those they have known for only days or weeks (aPR 1.13, [0.99-1.27]) or minutes or hours (aPR 1.27, [1.11-1.42]). Our findings underscore the role of dyadic factors in influencing serodisclosure. Comprehensive risk reduction counseling provided in conjunction with PrEP that address relationship characteristics are needed to help patients navigate discussions around HIV status.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrevelação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parceiros Sexuais , África do Sul , América do Sul , Tailândia , Pessoas Transgênero , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is used to prevent the sexual acquisition of HIV in groups at high risk such as transgender women. We used data from the iPrEx study to assess PrEP efficacy, effectiveness, and adherence in transgender women. METHODS: The iPrEx trial was a randomised controlled trial of PrEP with oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compared with placebo in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, followed by an open-label extension. Drug concentrations were measured in blood by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy. We did unplanned exploratory analyses to investigate differences in PrEP outcomes among transgender women and between transgender women and MSM. FINDINGS: Of the 2499 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial, 29 (1%) identified as women, 296 (12%) identified as trans, 14 (1%) identified as men but reported use of feminising hormones, such that 339 (14%) reported one or more characteristics and are classified as transgender women for the purpose of this study. Compared with MSM, transgender women more frequently reported transactional sex, receptive anal intercourse without a condom, or more than five partners in the past 3 months. Among transgender women, there were 11 HIV infections in the PrEP group and ten in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·1, 95% CI 0·5-2·7). In the PrEP group, drug was detected in none of the transgender women at the seroconversion visit, six (18%) of 33 seronegative transgender women (p=0·31), and 58 (52%) of 111 seronegative MSM (p<0·0001). PrEP use was not linked to behavioural indicators of HIV risk among transgender women, whereas MSM at highest risk were more adherent. INTERPRETATION: PrEP seems to be effective in preventing HIV acquisition in transgender women when taken, but there seem to be barriers to adherence, particularly among those at the most risk. Studies of PrEP use in transgender women populations should be designed and tailored specifically for this population, rather than adapted from or subsumed into studies of MSM. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Emtricitabina/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Tenofovir/administração & dosagem , Pessoas Transgênero , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Aconselhamento Diretivo/métodos , Equador/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Peru/epidemiologia , Parceiros Sexuais/psicologia , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Pessoas Transgênero/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Use of antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1 infection has decreased AIDS-related morbidity and mortality and prevents sexual transmission of HIV-1. However, the best time to initiate antiretroviral treatment to reduce progression of HIV-1 infection or non-AIDS clinical events is unknown. We reported previously that early antiretroviral treatment reduced HIV-1 transmission by 96%. We aimed to compare the effects of early and delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The HPTN 052 trial is a randomised controlled trial done at 13 sites in nine countries. We enrolled HIV-1-serodiscordant couples to the study and randomly allocated them to either early or delayed antiretroviral treatment by use of permuted block randomisation, stratified by site. Random assignment was unblinded. The HIV-1-infected member of every couple initiated antiretroviral treatment either on entry into the study (early treatment group) or after a decline in CD4 count or with onset of an AIDS-related illness (delayed treatment group). Primary events were AIDS clinical events (WHO stage 4 HIV-1 disease, tuberculosis, and severe bacterial infections) and the following serious medical conditions unrelated to AIDS: serious cardiovascular or vascular disease, serious liver disease, end-stage renal disease, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and non-AIDS malignant disease. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00074581. FINDINGS: 1763 people with HIV-1 infection and a serodiscordant partner were enrolled in the study; 886 were assigned early antiretroviral treatment and 877 to the delayed treatment group (two individuals were excluded from this group after randomisation). Median CD4 counts at randomisation were 442 (IQR 373-522) cells per µL in patients assigned to the early treatment group and 428 (357-522) cells per µL in those allocated delayed antiretroviral treatment. In the delayed group, antiretroviral treatment was initiated at a median CD4 count of 230 (IQR 197-249) cells per µL. Primary clinical events were reported in 57 individuals assigned to early treatment initiation versus 77 people allocated to delayed antiretroviral treatment (hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·52-1·03; p=0·074). New-onset AIDS events were recorded in 40 participants assigned to early antiretroviral treatment versus 61 allocated delayed initiation (0·64, 0·43-0·96; p=0·031), tuberculosis developed in 17 versus 34 patients, respectively (0·49, 0·28-0·89, p=0·018), and primary non-AIDS events were rare (12 in the early group vs nine with delayed treatment). In total, 498 primary and secondary outcomes occurred in the early treatment group (incidence 24·9 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 22·5-27·5) versus 585 in the delayed treatment group (29·2 per 100 person-years, 26·5-32·1; p=0·025). 26 people died, 11 who were allocated to early antiretroviral treatment and 15 who were assigned to the delayed treatment group. INTERPRETATION: Early initiation of antiretroviral treatment delayed the time to AIDS events and decreased the incidence of primary and secondary outcomes. The clinical benefits recorded, combined with the striking reduction in HIV-1 transmission risk previously reported, provides strong support for earlier initiation of antiretroviral treatment. FUNDING: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.