RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the precision of a simplified workflow using only preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans to gain guided access to root canals of extracted mandibular molars. A workflow using CBCT scanning associated with 3-dimensional oral scanning was used as a reference for comparison. The influence of the presence of coronal restoration in the simplified workflow was also evaluated. METHODS: Forty-five mandibular molars were randomized into 3 groups: a control group in which digital planning was performed with CBCT and oral scanning and 2 experimental groups in which digital planning was performed only with CBCT examination. In experimental group 1, teeth had no coronal restorations, whereas in group 2 teeth presented with coronal composite restorations. After digital planning, the teeth were accessed using the guides, and a new CBCT scan was made to overlap the pre- and postoperative examinations. Precision was measured by calculating the deviation between the planned and prepared cavities in millimeters and angle. Data were compared using 1-way analysis of variance (P < .05). RESULTS: All root canals were accessible after access preparation in all tested groups. Deviations of the planned and prepared access cavities were low, with a mean value of 0.55, 0.58, and 0.47 mm and 1.98°, 2.45°, and 1.43° for the control group, group 1, and group 2, respectively. No significant differences in millimeters or angle were observed among the 3 tested groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified digital workflow using only CBCT examination allowed a high level of precision in obtaining access in extracted molars with and without coronal restoration, presenting similar results compared with the digital workflow using CBCT and 3-dimensional oral scanning.
Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Cavidade Pulpar/cirurgia , Dente Molar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Fluxo de Trabalho , HumanosRESUMO
One of the challenges in apical surgery in mandibular molars is the thick buccal cortical bone plate, which might lead to access errors, damage to neighboring teeth, and injury to healthy tissue. Surgical guide templates with 3-dimensional (3D) impressions have been suggested for use in such cases, allowing greater precision. Usually, this technique involves a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination related to a 3D oral scanning to generate surgical templates printed from 3D imaging data. This study reports a novel workflow possibility in which apical surgery is performed with the aid of a surgical guide planned only with CBCT, excluding the need for 3D oral scanning. A 32-year-old woman presented with asymptomatic apical periodontitis and external root resorption on the mesial root of tooth #19. A surgical template was planned using only the patient's CBCT scan to provide precise access to the lesion and remove a mandibular cortical bone block. The procedure was carried out with apicoectomy, root-end preparation, and retrograde filling, and the bone block was repositioned before suture. No postoperative complications were reported. After 1 year, the patient presented asymptomatic, and a CBCT scan confirmed bone healing. The current 3D-printed guides may be planned and printed through a novel simplified workflow with a CBCT scan only, which allows its application in apical surgery for precise apex and surgical site location.
Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Dente Molar , Adulto , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Feminino , Humanos , Dente Molar/diagnóstico por imagem , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Raiz Dentária , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
Discuss the impact of new diagnostic and planning technologies on the resolution of a clinical case of an upper central incisor with lateral perforation, root canal calcification and apical periodontitis. A 44-year-old woman sought treatment because of a colour change in an anterior tooth. The tooth had already been endodontically accessed, and she reported that two different clinicians had failed to locate the root canal. A Cone Beam Computed Tomography scan showed excessive wear and root perforation in the middle third, as well as pulp canal obliteration in the apical third. The perforation was treated using a biomaterial, and the root canal was located using guided endodontics. This treatment protocol was used to access, prepare, medicate with calcium hydroxide for 21 days and fill the root canal. Treatment results were satisfactory at 6-month follow-up.
Assuntos
Endodontia , Adulto , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Assistência Odontológica , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Tratamento do Canal RadicularRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Guided endodontics emerged as an alternative method capable of providing greater precision and accuracy to endodontic treatments. The aim of the present study was to compare the volume of dental tissue removed after guided endodontic access (GEA) and conventional endodontic access (CEA) to mandibular incisors and upper molars. METHODS: Twenty extracted human mandibular incisors and upper molars were selected and submitted to cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) examination. They were divided into 2 groups, G1 (mandibular incisors) and G2 (maxillary molars), and subdivided into G1a (CEA), G1b (GEA), G2a (CEA), and G2b (GEA). The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files obtained by examining the CBCT scans were transferred to InVesalius software (Renato Archer Information Technology Center, Campinas, SP, Brazil) to calculate the initial volume of each tooth. G1b and G2b teeth were scanned with a device to plan and print the guides. After gaining endodontic access, new CBCT examinations were performed to calculate the final volume of each sample unit. The Student t test for independent samples compared the volumes among the groups. RESULTS: G1 group had an average volume reduction of 31.667 mm3 (10.62%) using CEA and 26.523 mm3 (10.65%) using GEA with no significant difference among the groups (P = .960). There was an average volume reduction of 62.526 mm3 (5.86%) in the G2 group using CEA and 45.677 mm3 (4.11%) using GEA with a significant difference among the groups (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: GEA preserved a greater volume of dental tissue in extracted upper human molars than CEA; however, there was no significant difference between CEA and GEA in the volume of dental tissue removed from mandibular incisors.