RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate characteristics that may be associated with radiologic and functional findings following discharge in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational cohort study comprised patients aged >18 years who were hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia, between May and October 2020. After 3 to 6 months of discharge, patients were clinically evaluated and underwent spirometry, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and chest computed tomography (CT). Statistical analysis was performed using association and correlation tests. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included (25/114 [22%] were admitted with severe hypoxemia). On the follow-up chest CT, 29/92 (32%) had no abnormalities, regardless of the severity of the initial involvement, and the mean 6MWT distance was 447 m. Patients with desaturation on admission had an increased risk of remaining CT abnormalities: patients with SpO2 between 88 and 92% had a 4.0-fold risk, and those with SpO2 < 88% had a 6.2-fold risk. The group with SpO2 < 88% also walked shorter distances than patients with SpO2 between 88 and 92%. CONCLUSION: Initial hypoxemia was found to be a good predictor of persistent radiological abnormalities in follow-up and was associated with low performance in 6MWT.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 co-infections have been described with different pathogens, including filamentous and yeast fungi. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective case series study conducted from February to December 2020, at a Brazilian university hospital. Data were collected from two hospital surveillance systems: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) surveillance (Mycosis Resistance Program - MIRE) and COVID-19 surveillance. Data from both surveillance systems were cross-checked to identify individuals diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 (by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) and IFI during hospital stays within the study period. RESULTS: During the study period, 716 inpatients with COVID-19 and 55 cases of IFI were identified. Fungal co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 was observed in eight (1%) patients: three cases of aspergillosis; four candidemia and one cryptococcosis. The median age of patients was 66 years (IQR 58-71 years; range of 28-77 years) and 62.5% were men. Diagnosis of IFI occurred a median of 11.5 days (IQR 4.5-23 days) after admission and 11 days (IQR 6.5-16 days) after a positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2. In 75% of cases, IFI was diagnosed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Cases of aspergillosis emerged earlier than those of candidemia: an average of 8.6 and 28.6 days after a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, respectively. All the patients with both infections ultimately died. CONCLUSION: A low rate of COVID-19 co-infection with IFI was observed, with high mortality. Most cases were diagnosed in ICU patients. Aspergillosis diagnosis is highly complex in this context and requires different criteria.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction Hearing losses inherent to the natural process of aging represent today a major public health issue, despite the little attention that their adequate care still receives. Early recognition and proper management of these shortcomings can significantly improve hearing, as well as the patient's general quality of life, reducing the overall impact of this important and prevalent condition of the aging process. Objective The aim of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening Version (HHIE-S) in the diagnosis of hearing loss in the elderly when compared with the audiometric test. Methods Through a cross-sectional study, our target population was composed of 138 individuals, aged over 60 and with any otorhinolaryngological complaints, recruited at the Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Speech Therapy of the Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (Famema), in the city of Marília, SP, Brazil. Patients already in the process of auditory rehabilitation were excluded, as well as those who did not demonstrate the minimum level of oral understanding necessary to allow the interview. Results The prevalence of hearing loss according to the questionnaire was of 76.1%, while audiometry showed 79.7%. We found the diagnostic accuracy of the instrument to be of 86.2%, with a sensitivity of 89.1% and a specificity of 75.0%, regardless of gender. Conclusion Thereby, we conclude that the standardized questionnaire under rating is suitable for the screening of hearing loss in the elderly, given its high accuracy and user-friendly quality.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Hearing losses inherent to the natural process of aging represent today a major public health issue, despite the little attention that their adequate care still receives. Early recognition and proper management of these shortcomings can significantly improve hearing, as well as the patient's general quality of life, reducing the overall impact of this important and prevalent condition of the aging process. Objective The aim of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening Version (HHIE-S) in the diagnosis of hearing loss in the elderly when compared with the audiometric test. Methods Through a cross-sectional study, our target population was composed of 138 individuals, aged over 60 and with any otorhinolaryngological complaints, recruited at the Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Speech Therapy of the Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (Famema), in the city ofMarília, SP, Brazil. Patients already in the process of auditory rehabilitation were excluded, as well as those who did not demonstrate the minimum level of oral understanding necessary to allow the interview. Results The prevalence of hearing loss according to the questionnaire was of 76.1%, while audiometry showed 79.7%. We found the diagnostic accuracy of the instrument to be of 86.2%, with a sensitivity of 89.1% and a specificity of 75.0%, regardless of gender. Conclusion Thereby, we conclude that the standardized questionnaire under rating is suitable for the screening of hearing loss in the elderly, given its high accuracy and userfriendly quality.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Combined antiretroviral therapy has enabled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) carriers to live longer. This increased life expectancy is associated with the occurrence of degenerative diseases, including HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), which are diagnosed via a complex neuropsychological assessment. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) is a screening instrument validated in Brazil for use in the absence of neuropsychological evaluation. HIV patients are frequently diagnosed with depression. We aimed to determine the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment using the IHDS and depressive disorders using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17), compare the IHDS performance with the performances on the Timed Gait Test (TGT), the Digit Symbol Coding Test (DS) and the Brazilian version of the Scale of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and evaluate the association between the IHDS performance and clinical-demographic variables. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients were evaluated in a cross-sectional study conducted in a public outpatient clinic for infectious diseases in Marília City, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected following consultation. Statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the nature and distribution of the data and hypotheses. RESULTS: According to the IHDS, 53.2% of the sampled patients were neuropsychologically impaired. According to the HAM-D17, 26.3% had depressive disorders. There were significant associations between the IHDS and the TGT and DS. Multiple regression analysis indicated that female gender, educational level, and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) levels were significantly and independently associated with neurocognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of neurocognitive impairment according to the IHDS is high and associated with female gender, education level, and low CD4 levels.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Combined antiretroviral therapy has enabled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) carriers to live longer. This increased life expectancy is associated with the occurrence of degenerative diseases, including HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), which are diagnosed via a complex neuropsychological assessment. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) is a screening instrument validated in Brazil for use in the absence of neuropsychological evaluation. HIV patients are frequently diagnosed with depression. We aimed to determine the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment using the IHDS and depressive disorders using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17), compare the IHDS performance with the performances on the Timed Gait Test (TGT), the Digit Symbol Coding Test (DS) and the Brazilian version of the Scale of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and evaluate the association between the IHDS performance and clinical-demographic variables.

RESUMO

Introdução A incerteza influencia diretamente a tomada de decisões pelos médicos, e a inabilidade em lidar com ela pode resultar em cuidados médicos com baixo padrão de qualidade eem desperdício de recursos em saúde. A incerteza também afeta a satisfação profissional e a qualidade de vida desses profissionais. O questionário Physicians’ Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) objetiva quantificar as reações afetivas de médicos à incerteza e suas maneiras de lidar com ela. Os objetivos deste trabalho são a tradução para o português, a adaptação cultural e a validação do questionário PRU. Materiais e métodos Estudo transversal analítico, que compreende a tradução, retrotradução e adaptação cultural do questionário PRU. As etapas posteriores consistiram em validação na população-alvo, seguida de avaliação de reprodutibilidade intra e interobservador, e análise da consistência interna. Na avaliação da consistência interna do instrumento foi utilizado o coeficiente alfa de Cronbach; e na análise da reprodutibilidade intra e interobservador, o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Resultados Em todos os domínios do questionário, os resultados da correlação intraobservador (test-retest) e interobservador (concordância total) pelo testede correlação de Pearson foram estatisticamente significantes, com p<0,01. De forma geral, a consistência interna do instrumento foi moderada, com um alfa de Cronbach de 0,58. Entre as várias dimensões, atingiu-se consistência moderada, com valores que oscilaram ao redor de 0,6. Conclusões A versão brasileira do questionário PRU tem propriedades de medida adequadas e oferece um novo instrumento nesse campo de pesquisa, possibilitando melhor compreensão da incerteza gerada na tomada de decisão clínica. .

Introduction Uncertainty directly influences physicians’ decision-making, and their inability to deal with it can result in substandard medical care and wasted health care resources. Uncertainty also affects the job satisfaction and quality of life of such professionals. The Physicians’ Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) questionnaire aims to quantify the emotive reactions of physicians to uncertainty and their ways of dealing with it. The objectives of this study are the Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the PRU questionnaire. Materials and Methods Cross-sectional analytic study involving translation, back-translation and cultural adaptation of the PRU questionnaire. The subsequent steps consisted of validation in the target population, followed by assessment of intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and internal consistency analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the questionnaire, and Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient was applied for the test-retest. Results In all areas of the questionnaire the results of the intra-observer (test-retest) and inter-observer (total agreement) correlation through Pearson’s correlation test were statistically significant, with p < 0.01. Overall, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was moderate, with a Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.58. Among the various dimensions, a moderate consistency was achieved, with values oscillating around 0.06. Conclusions The Brazilian version of the PRU questionnaire has demonstrated adequate measurement properties and offers a new instrument in this field of research, enabling better understanding of the uncertainty generated in clinical decision-making. .

RESUMO

This scope of this paper is to analyze the training of nurses and physicians to work in primary care at a public institution in the municipality of Marilia, duly identifying the concepts of professors, coordinators and graduates in relation to the formation of health professionals. It is a qualitative, exploratory study with interviews conducted with 21 individuals. The results revealed that according to the individuals interviewed, both courses prepare professionals to work in primary care, albeit with limitations in relation to actions in management collective and care. The interviewees believe that the use of active methodologies has been important in the teaching and learning process. Also, the fact that from the first year of undergraduate studies the students participate in primary health care broadens their knowledge of this reality. The study highlights the need to enhance the teaching-service partnership and strategies to improve the training physicians to work in primary health care.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Este estudo analisa a formação de enfermeiros e médicos de uma instituição pública do município de Marília para a atuação em Atenção Primária, identificando as concepções dos docentes, coordenadores e egressos em relação à formação profissional. Trata-se de um estudo qualitativo, exploratório, realizado por meio de entrevistas com 21 sujeitos. Os resultados revelaram que segundo os entrevistados ambos os cursos preparam os profissionais para atuar em Atenção Primária, entretanto, com limitações em relação às ações de gestão e cuidado coletivo. Os entrevistados acreditam que o uso das metodologias ativas tem sido importante para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem e que o fato dos estudantes participarem desde o primeiro ano da graduação junto a Atenção Primária amplia o conhecimento sobre esta realidade. O estudo aponta para a necessidade do fortalecimento da parceria ensino serviço e de estratégias que melhorem a formação do médico para atuação na Atenção Primária.

This scope of this paper is to analyze the training of nurses and physicians to work in primary care at a public institution in the municipality of Marilia, duly identifying the concepts of professors, coordinators and graduates in relation to the formation of health professionals. It is a qualitative, exploratory study with interviews conducted with 21 individuals. The results revealed that according to the individuals interviewed, both courses prepare professionals to work in primary care, albeit with limitations in relation to actions in management collective and care. The interviewees believe that the use of active methodologies has been important in the teaching and learning process. Also, the fact that from the first year of undergraduate studies the students participate in primary health care broadens their knowledge of this reality. The study highlights the need to enhance the teaching-service partnership and strategies to improve the training physicians to work in primary health care.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The scope of this study is to identify contributions and limits of teaching-service integration between the School of Medicine of Marília and the Municipal Health Department of Marília for academia, for the health teams and for the community. The study involved cross-sectional research using a quantitative approach. A questionnaire with 20 affirmations structured around a Likert scale was applied to students, professors and collaborating professors with a total of 183 participants. A trend for a positive evaluation of teaching-service integration for professional education was revealed. As regards contributions of teaching-service integration to the community, the positive evaluation was close to 50%. The items referring to contributions to the health teams were the ones that had the highest number of negative responses. Data indicate that it is necessary to move forward such that teaching and service are considered interdependent processes with possibilities of joint reflections.

Assuntos