RESUMO

Objetivo: desenvolver e validar instrumentos de aprendizagem e avaliação voltados para o ensino híbrido da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar neonatal. Métodos: pesquisa aplicada, de produção tecnológica e validação de ferramentas pedagógicas com 13 experts por meio de First-order Agreement Coefficient. Resultados: desenvolveu-se o script e storyboard de uma videoaula com cinco módulos e um vídeo de simulação sobre um cenário clínico de atendimento da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar neonatal, além de um questionário de vinte perguntas para avaliação do conhecimento cognitivo e um Exame Clínico Objetivo Estruturado com cinco estações para análise das habilidades psicomotoras. Todos os constructos obtiveram índice de concordância interavaliadores quase perfeita. Conclusão: esta pesquisa disponibilizou ferramentas pedagógicas validadas e fundamentadas em evidências científicas sobre a ressuscitação cardiopulmonar neonatal que sustentam o ensino híbrido e adoção da simulação clínica baseada em vídeo

Objective: To develop and validate learning and assessment tools for hybrid teaching of neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Method: An applied research for technological production and validation of pedagogical tools was conducted with 13 experts using First-order Agreement Coefficient. Results: A script and storyboard for a five-module video class and a simulation video on a clinical scenario of neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation care were developed, as well as a twenty-question questionnaire to assess cognitive knowledge and a five-station Clinical Examination Objective Structured to analyze psychomotor skills. All constructs had an almost perfect inter-rater agreement index. Conclusion: This study provides evidence-based validated pedagogical tools for neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which support hybrid teaching and the adoption of video-based clinical simulation.

Objetivo: desarrollar y validar herramientas de aprendizaje y evaluación dirigidas a la enseñanza híbrida de la reanimación cardiopulmonar neonatal. Métodos: investigación aplicada, de producción tecnológica y validación de herramientas pedagógicas con 13 expertos mediante el First-order Agreement Coefficient. Resultados: se desarrolló un guion y storyboard para una clase de video con cinco módulos y un video de simulación sobre un escenario de reanimación cardiopulmonar neonatal, un cuestionario de veinte preguntas para el conocimiento cognitivo y un Examen Clínico Estructurado con cinco estaciones para el análisis de las habilidades psicomotoras. Los constructos tenían un índice de acuerdo entre evaluadores casi perfecto. Conclusión: esta investigación permite disponer de herramientas pedagógicas validadas y basadas en evidencia científica sobre la reanimación cardiopulmonar neonatal, que apoyan enseñanza híbrida y adopción de simulación clínica basada en video.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of co-debriefing with debriefing with a facilitator in the development of clinical competences in nursing students in the simulated care of cardiac arrest. METHOD: Randomized pilot study, carried out at a university in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in August 2021, with 17 students, to compare debriefing with a facilitator (control n=8) with co-debriefing (intervention n=9). Pre- and post-test, Objective Structured Clinical Examination and scales were used to assess behavioral skills. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney nonparametric comparison tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: The intervention group performed better than the control for knowledge about basic life support (control=17.00±2.39 and intervention=19.22 ± 0.66, p=0.021) and psychomotor skills (control=8.12±0.13 and intervention=8.50 ± 0.001, p<0.001). There were no significant differences for behavioral skills. CONCLUSION: Co-debriefing appears to be more effective than debriefing with a facilitator to develop clinical skills in basic life support in nursing.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: identificar a efetividade da simulação clínica baseada na aprendizagem experiencial, como referencial teórico-metodológico, em comparação com diferentes estratégias pedagógicas no ensino em enfermagem. Método: revisão sistemática, realizada nas fontes Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online; Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literaturee Educational Resources Information Center. Utilizou-se instrumentos de avaliação do percuso metodológico. Resultados: identificaram-se 268 estudos, e quatro compuseram a amostra. Comparou-se a aprendizagem experiencial na simulação com o estudo de caso; aula expositiva; resolução de problemas e a simulação sem referencial. Os estudos obtiveram boa qualidade pelo instrumento do JBI e moderada pelo Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusão: a aprendizagem experiencial sinaliza efetividade para o ensino em enfermagem baseado em simulação.

Objective: to identify the effectiveness of clinical simulation based on experiential learning, as a theoretical-methodological framework, in comparison with different pedagogical strategies in nursing education. Method: systematic review, performed in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online sources; Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Educational Resources Information Center. Instruments for evaluating the methodological path were used. Results: 268 studies were identified, and four composed the sample. Experiential learning, in simulation, was compared with the case study; expository class; problem solving and benchmarkless simulation. The studies obtained good quality by the instrument of JBI and moderated by the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusion: experiential learning signals effectiveness for simulation-based nursing education.

Objetivo: identificar la efectividad de la simulación clínica basada en el aprendizaje experiencial, como marco teórico-metodológico, en comparación con diferentes estrategias pedagógicas en la educación en enfermería. Método: revisión sistemática, realizada en las fuentes Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online; Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literaturey Educational Resources Information Center. Se utilizaron instrumentos para evaluar la trayectoria metodológica. Resultados: identificaron 268 estudios, y cuatro compusieron la muestra. El aprendizaje experiencial se comparó con estudio de caso; clase expositiva; resolución de problemas y simulación sin referencia. Los estudios obtuvieron buena calidad por el instrumento del JBI y moderados por el Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusión: el aprendizaje experiencial señala la eficacia de la educación en enfermería basada en simulación.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the effectiveness of co-debriefing with debriefing with a facilitator in the development of clinical competences in nursing students in the simulated care of cardiac arrest. Method Randomized pilot study, carried out at a university in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in August 2021, with 17 students, to compare debriefing with a facilitator (control n=8) with co-debriefing (intervention n=9). Pre- and post-test, Objective Structured Clinical Examination and scales were used to assess behavioral skills. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney nonparametric comparison tests were used for analysis. Results The intervention group performed better than the control for knowledge about basic life support (control=17.00±2.39 and intervention=19.22 ± 0.66, p=0.021) and psychomotor skills (control=8.12±0.13 and intervention=8.50 ± 0.001, p<0.001). There were no significant differences for behavioral skills. Conclusion Co-debriefing appears to be more effective than debriefing with a facilitator to develop clinical skills in basic life support in nursing.

RESUMEN Objetivo Comparar la efectividad del co-debriefing con el debriefing con facilitador en el desarrollo de competencias clínicas en estudiantes de enfermería en el cuidado simulado de parada cardiaca. Método Estudio piloto aleatorizado, realizado en una universidad de Minas Gerais, Brasil, en agosto de 2021, con 17 estudiantes, para comparar el debriefing con un facilitador (control n=8) con el co-debriefing (intervención n=9). Se utilizaron pruebas previas y posteriores, examen clínico objetivo estructurado y escalas para evaluar las habilidades conductuales. Para el análisis se utilizaron las pruebas de comparación no paramétrica de Wilcoxon y Mann-whitney. Resultados El grupo intervención se desempeñó mejor que el control en conocimientos sobre soporte vital básico (control=17,00±2,39 e intervención=19,22 ± 0,66, p=0,021) y psicomotricidad (control=8, 12±0,13 e intervención=8,50 ± 0,001, p <0,001). No hubo diferencias significativas para las habilidades conductuales. Conclusión El co-debriefing parece ser más efectivo que el debriefing con un facilitador para desarrollar habilidades clínicas en soporte vital básico en enfermería.

RESUMO Objetivo Comparar a efetividade entre co-debriefing com debriefing com facilitador no desenvolvimento de competências clínicas em estudantes de enfermagem no atendimento simulado da parada cardiorrespiratória. Método Estudo-piloto randomizado, realizado em uma universidade de Minas Gerais, Brasil, em agosto de 2021 com 17 estudantes, para comparar o debriefing com um facilitador (controle n=8) e com o co-debriefing (intervenção n=9). Utilizaram-se pré e pós-teste, Exame Clínico Objetivo Estruturado e escalas para avaliar as habilidades comportamentais. Adotaram-se testes de comparação não paramétricos Wilcoxon e Mann-whitney para análise. Resultados O grupo intervenção obteve desempenho superior ao controle para o conhecimento sobre o suporte básico de vida (controle=17,00±2,39 e intervenção=19,22 ± 0,66, p=0,021) e habilidades psicomotoras (controle=8,12±0,13 e intervenção=8,50 ± 0,001, p<0,001). Não houve diferenças significativas para as habilidades comportamentais. Conclusão O co-debriefing parece ser mais efetivo do que o debriefing como um facilitador para desenvolver competências clínicas no suporte básico de vida em enfermagem.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate a blended learning program, of the inverted classroom type, on the aspiration of artificial airways. METHOD: applied and methodological research that involved technological production for teaching a Nursing Intervention, based on Vygotsky's theoretical frameworks and on the Nursing Process. For elaboration and validation, a classic instructional design model was followed. The general and pedagogical requirements were validated, as well as those for videos and interface. For the analysis, the Content Validity Index and the First-order agreement coefficient were used. RESULTS: 34 experts participated, 27 of whom were nurses and seven were professionals in Information Technology. In the nurses' opinion, the general and pedagogical requirements obtained a Content Validity Index of 0.99 and 0.98 was obtained for the videos and for the interface. The interface for the IT professionals was 0.94. All requirements showed almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: the teaching program was elaborated and validated by experts and constitutes an innovative proposal to train nurses. The mediation of teaching by means of duly validated technologies can favor learning and reaching positive results in the development of skills in the practice of aspiration of artificial airways.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze available scientific evidence in literature pertaining to the elements that make the instructor-led oral debriefing technique in clinical nursing simulation feasible. METHODS: An Integrative literature review along the following information sources: PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) [Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature], Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC). RESULTS: 284 studies were identified, and 5 composed the sample. Four elements constitute oral debriefing: characteristics of the instructor; discussion format, debriefing structure; and time frame. The main benefit was to develop cognitive and psychomotor skills; and the challenge was to establish training for instructors. The studies showed high methodological quality. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The scientific deepening as to the elements, benefits, and challenges of oral debriefing enables its execution and offers quality to the nursing process.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the scientific evidence on the use of Bloom's taxonomy for developing competence in nursing professionals and students in clinical simulation. METHODS: integrative review of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, using the Rayyan application. RESULTS: a total of 871 studies were identified; four composed the sample. The development of clinical competence occurred through the coordination of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. To develop the cognitive domain, the objectives of knowledge and comprehension of the Bloom's taxonomy were mobilized. The psychomotor domain required development of the skills demanded by the proposed clinical care. The affective domain was developed through will and motivation to learn. CONCLUSIONS: it is possible to develop clinical competence in nursing by adopting Bloom's taxonomy in each phase of clinical simulation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo desenvolver e validar um roteiro para planejar e executar o debriefing oral orientado por único facilitador, na simulação clínica do Suporte Básico de Vida Método estudo metodológico, realizado em uma universidade pública do estado de São Paulo, Brasil, entre julho e novembro de 2020. Procedeu-se a síntese das evidências do roteiro por meio de revisão e sua validação com 16 juízes, adotando-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo Resultados identificaram-se 284 estudos e selecionaram-se cinco. Os conteúdos são: definição e objetivo do debriefing, características do instrutor; público-alvo; objetivos de aprendizagem; método de debriefing; recursos materiais; procedimento; tempo e referências. O roteiro atingiu Índice de Validade de Conteúdo de 0,95 Conclusão considerou-se o roteiro válido e capaz de contribuir com a pesquisa, assistência e ensino em enfermagem, por conduzir o planejamento e a execução do debriefing no Suporte Básico de Vida, e ser adaptável a outras realidades em saúde

RESUMEN Objetivo desarrollar y validar un guion para planificar y ejecutar el debriefing oral guiado por un único facilitador en la simulación clínica de Soporte Básico de Vida Método estudio metodológico, realizado en una universidad pública del estado de São Paulo, Brasil, entre julio y noviembre de 2020. Las pruebas del guion se sintetizaron mediante la revisión y validación con 16 jueces, utilizando el Índice de Validez de Contenido Resultados Se identificaron 284 estudios y se seleccionaron cinco. Los contenidos son: definición y propósito del debriefing, características del instructor; público objetivo; objetivos de aprendizaje; método de debriefing; recursos materiales; procedimiento; tiempo y referencias. El guion alcanzó un Índice de Validez de Contenido de 0,95 Conclusión el guion se consideró válido y capaz de contribuir a la investigación, la asistencia y la docencia en enfermería, ya que conduce a la planificación y ejecución del debriefing en Soporte Básico de Vida, y es adaptable a otras realidades de salud

ABSTRACT Objective to develop and validate a script to plan and execute the oral debriefing guided by a single facilitator in the clinical simulation of Basic Life Support Method methodological study, conducted at a public university in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, between July and November 2020. We proceeded to synthesize the evidence of the script through review and its validation with 16 judges, adopting the Content Validity Index Results 284 studies were identified and five were selected. The contents are definition and objective of the debriefing; characteristics of the instructor; target audience; learning objectives; debriefing method; material resources; procedure; time; and references. The script reached a Content Validity Index of 0.95 Conclusion the script was considered valid and capable of contributing to research, assistance and teaching in nursing, for conducting the planning and execution of debriefing in Basic Life Support and being adaptable to other health realities

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo: identificar as estratégias de ensino e aprendizagem da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar voltadas para pessoas leigas. Método: revisão integrativa realizada nas fontes National Library of Medicine; National Institutes of Health; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde; Web of Science; e SCOPUS. Resultados: identificaram-se 932 estudos e incluíram-se 11. As estratégias foram: aula expositiva; treinamento com manequim/instrutor; manequim/instrutor/dispositivo de feedback; videoaula e web. Adotou-se, frequentemente, o manequim/instrutor, no entanto, demonstrou-se mais efetivo associar dispositivo de feedback e/ou videoaula. Os estudos foram considerados de boa qualidade pelo instrumento do Instituto Joanna Briggs e de moderada qualidade pelo Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusão: as evidências sobre o ensino da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar para leigos indicaram as principais e mais efetivas estratégias para a adoção de melhores práticas.

RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la reanimación cardiopulmonar dirigidas a legos. Método: revisión integrativa realizada en fuentes de la National Library of Medicine; National Institutes of Health; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud; Web of Science; y SCOPUS. Resultados: se identificaron 932 estudios y se incluyeron 11. Las estrategias fueron: clase expositiva; entrenamiento con maniquí / instructor; maniquí / instructor / dispositivo de feedback; clase de video y web. El muñeco / instructor se adoptó a menudo, sin embargo, demostró ser más efectivo asociar un dispositivo de feedback y / o una clase de video. Los estudios fueron considerados de buena calidad por el instrumento del Instituto Joanna Briggs y de calidad moderada por el Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusión: la evidencia sobre la enseñanza de la reanimación cardiopulmonar a legos indicó las principales y más efectivas estrategias para la adopción de mejores prácticas.

ABSTRACT Objective: to identify teaching and learning strategies for cardiopulmonary resuscitation aimed at laypeople. Method: integrative review carried out in the National Library of Medicine sources; National Institutes of Health; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences; Web of Science; and SCOPUS. Results: 932 studies were identified and 11 were included. The strategies were: lecture; training with dummy/instructor; dummy/instructor/feedback device; video class and web. The dummy/instructor was often adopted, however, it proved to be more effective to associate a feedback device and/or video class. The studies were considered of good quality by the Joanna Briggs Institute instrument and of moderate quality by the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Conclusion: the evidence on the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to laypeople indicated the main and most effective strategies for the adoption of best practices.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze available scientific evidence in literature pertaining to the elements that make the instructor-led oral debriefing technique in clinical nursing simulation feasible. Methods: An Integrative literature review along the following information sources: PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) [Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature], Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC). Results: 284 studies were identified, and 5 composed the sample. Four elements constitute oral debriefing: characteristics of the instructor; discussion format, debriefing structure; and time frame. The main benefit was to develop cognitive and psychomotor skills; and the challenge was to establish training for instructors. The studies showed high methodological quality. Final Considerations: The scientific deepening as to the elements, benefits, and challenges of oral debriefing enables its execution and offers quality to the nursing process.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar las evidencias científicas disponibles en la literatura sobre los elementos que hacen viable la técnica de debriefing oral orientado por instructor en la simulación clínica en enfermería. Métodos: Revisión integrativa de la literatura realizada en las fuentes de información: PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de Salud (LILACS), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) y Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC). Resultados: Se identificaron 284 estudios, y 5 compusieron la muestra. Cuatro elementos constituyen el debriefing oral: características del instructor; formato de la discusión, estructura del debriefing; y tiempo. El principal beneficio ha sido desarrollar habilidades cognitivas y psicomotrices; y el desafío, establecer entrenamiento a los instructores. Los estudios presentaron alta calidad metodológica. Consideraciones finales: La profundización científica cuanto a los elementos, beneficios y desafíos del debriefing oral posibilita su ejecución y confiere calidad al proceso para enfermería.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar as evidências científicas disponíveis na literatura sobre os elementos que viabilizam a técnica de debriefing oral orientado por instrutor na simulação clínica em enfermagem. Métodos: Revisão integrativa da literatura realizada nas fontes de informação: PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) e Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC). Resultados: Identificaram-se 284 estudos, e 5 compuseram a amostra. Quatro elementos constituem o debriefing oral: características do instrutor; formato da discussão, estrutura do debriefing; e tempo. O principal benefício foi desenvolver habilidades cognitivas e psicomotoras; e o desafio, estabelecer treinamento aos instrutores. Os estudos apresentaram alta qualidade metodológica. Considerações finais: O aprofundamento científico quanto aos elementos, benefícios e desafios do debriefing oral possibilita sua execução e confere qualidade ao processo para enfermagem.