RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Adermatoglyphia is defined as the medical condition clinically diagnosed to those who have a congenital or acquired loss of the epidermal ridges on the fingertips, commonly known as fingerprints. Capecitabine, a fluoropyrimidine, is the treatment of choice in a myriad of tumors and has occasionally been reported to cause adermatoglyphia as a secondary effect upon its use. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old female patient, diagnosed with stage IV metastatic left breast cancer with extension to bone in late 2011 reported upon biopsy a hormone receptor positive Her2 negative ductal carcinoma. After initial treatment with a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy palliative treatment, hepatic and lung metastasis progression obliged capecitabine oral intake. In 2018, after two years on the fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine), the patient reported adermatoglyphia. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: The patient opted to continue taking the medication, since such treatment was working with no other meaningful side effects. Her last work-up studies continue to show complete lung and liver response with stable bone disease. DISCUSSION: Capecitabine is a common drug in the therapy against metastatic breast cancer due to its manageable safety profile. Hand-foot syndrome is a frequent side effect caused by this drug, with dosage adjustment recommended with progression of symptoms. Recent publications have reported adermatoglyphia as a rare side effect of capecitabine use. Upon further examination through dermatoscopy and biopsy, the patient was evidenced to have lost the epidermal ridges that form fingerprints. A score of 9 on the Naranjo scale confirmed to be a consequence of the administration of capecitabine.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Síndrome Mão-Pé , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Mão-Pé/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in adjuvant therapeutic decision in a cohort of young women with breast cancer discussed by a multidisciplinary team, before and after EndoPredict testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 99 premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, T1-T2, and N0-N1 breast cancer were included. Clinicopathological characteristics were recorded and cases were presented in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Consensual therapeutic decisions before and after EndoPredict results were registered. Medical records were reviewed at six-month follow-up to determine physicians' adherence to therapeutic recommendations. Pearson chi-square and McNemar's tests were used to analyze differences between groups and changes in treatment recommendations, respectively. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 43 years. The most frequent tumor size was pT2 (53.5%) and 27% of patients had 1-3 positive lymph nodes. 46% of patients had a low-risk EPclin result. Nodal status and tumor grade were significantly associated with EPclin result (p < .00001 and p = .0110, respectively), while Ki67 levels and age ≤40 years were not. A change in chemotherapy decision was registered in 19.2% of patients (p = .066), with the greatest impact in de-escalation (9% net reduction). A change in chemotherapy or endocrine therapy regimen was suggested in 19% and 20% of cases, respectively, after EPclin results were available. A significant difference was found in the median EPclin score between patients with a low- vs. high-intensity chemotherapy and endocrine therapy regimen recommendation (p = 0.049 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Tumor board treatment recommendation adherence with the EndoPredict result was 95% and final treatment adherence to EPclin result was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoPredict test successfully assisted the clinical decision-making process in premenopausal patients, with a clinically significant change in overall decision-making, with the greatest impact seen in chemotherapy reduction, and a high rate of therapeutic adherence.