Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breast Cancer Res ; 25(1): 111, 2023 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37784177

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Latin American and Hispanic women are less likely to develop breast cancer (BC) than women of European descent. Observational studies have found an inverse relationship between the individual proportion of Native American ancestry and BC risk. Here, we use ancestry-informative markers to rule out potential confounding of this relationship, estimating the confounder-free effect of Native American ancestry on BC risk. METHODS AND STUDY POPULATION: We used the informativeness for assignment measure to select robust instrumental variables for the individual proportion of Native American ancestry. We then conducted separate Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses based on 1401 Colombian women, most of them from the central Andean regions of Cundinamarca and Huila, and 1366 Mexican women from Mexico City, Monterrey and Veracruz, supplemented by sensitivity and stratified analyses. RESULTS: The proportion of Colombian Native American ancestry showed a putatively causal protective effect on BC risk (inverse variance-weighted odds ratio [OR] = 0.974 per 1% increase in ancestry proportion, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.970-0.978, p = 3.1 × 10-40). The corresponding OR for Mexican Native American ancestry was 0.988 (95% CI 0.987-0.990, p = 1.4 × 10-44). Stratified analyses revealed a stronger association between Native American ancestry and familial BC (Colombian women: OR = 0.958, 95% CI 0.952-0.964; Mexican women: OR = 0.973, 95% CI 0.969-0.978), and stronger protective effects on oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC than on ER-negative and triple-negative BC. CONCLUSIONS: The present results point to an unconfounded protective effect of Native American ancestry on BC risk in both Colombian and Mexican women which appears to be stronger for familial and ER-positive BC. These findings provide a rationale for personalised prevention programmes that take genetic ancestry into account, as well as for future admixture mapping studies.


Assuntos
Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca , Neoplasias da Mama , Feminino , Humanos , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/etnologia , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/genética , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/estatística & dados numéricos , Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Colômbia/epidemiologia , México/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/etnologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/genética
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 107(5)2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25890600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survival after a diagnosis of breast cancer varies considerably between patients, and some of this variation may be because of germline genetic variation. We aimed to identify genetic markers associated with breast cancer-specific survival. METHODS: We conducted a large meta-analysis of studies in populations of European ancestry, including 37954 patients with 2900 deaths from breast cancer. Each study had been genotyped for between 200000 and 900000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome; genotypes for nine million common variants were imputed using a common reference panel from the 1000 Genomes Project. We also carried out subtype-specific analyses based on 6881 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative patients (920 events) and 23059 ER-positive patients (1333 events). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified one new locus (rs2059614 at 11q24.2) associated with survival in ER-negative breast cancer cases (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55 to 2.47, P = 1.91 x 10(-8)). Genotyping a subset of 2113 case patients, of which 300 were ER negative, provided supporting evidence for the quality of the imputation. The association in this set of case patients was stronger for the observed genotypes than for the imputed genotypes. A second locus (rs148760487 at 2q24.2) was associated at genome-wide statistical significance in initial analyses; the association was similar in ER-positive and ER-negative case patients. Here the results of genotyping suggested that the finding was less robust. CONCLUSIONS: This is currently the largest study investigating genetic variation associated with breast cancer survival. Our results have potential clinical implications, as they confirm that germline genotype can provide prognostic information in addition to standard tumor prognostic factors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genótipo , Humanos , Prognóstico , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Análise de Sobrevida , População Branca/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA