RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate health care provider awareness and perceptions of the 2 types of advanced practice pharmacists (APPhs) in New Mexico: pharmacist clinicians (PhCs) and community pharmacists with independent prescriptive authority (iRPhs). METHODS: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to health care providers in New Mexico to describe awareness and perceptions of APPhs and benefits and barriers to collaborative practice with APPhs. RESULTS: A total of 5905 providers received the emailed survey, and 634 (11%) completed the survey, with 68% of the respondents indicating that they were not aware of the 2 types of APPhs in New Mexico. The top benefits of working with a PhC identified by the respondents were access to medication knowledge, enhanced clinical outcomes, and increased access to patient care. The barriers to employing a PhC at their practice included cost, difficulty in billing for services, and limited reimbursement. Importantly, 80% of the respondents felt that PhCs should be recognized as providers for insurance reimbursement. Awareness of iRPhs varied by prescriptive authority service, ranging from 34% for tuberculin skin testing to 84% for adult vaccinations. Overall, 80%-92% indicated that iRPhs should be reimbursed, depending on the prescriptive authority service. CONCLUSION: Provider awareness of APPhs in New Mexico was low; however, the willingness to refer patients to APPhs for clinical services was high. Cost, difficulty in billing for services, and reimbursement for PhC services were the primary identified barriers to adding a PhC into practice. Most of the respondents indicated that both types of APPhs should be granted provider status and reimbursed by third-party payers for their services.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Farmacêuticos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , New Mexico , PercepçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe differences, attitudes, and experiences in use of complementary and alternative medicines and therapy (CAMT) in people living in New Mexico (NM). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Clinics staffed by the University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy faculty between September 2009 and August 2011 in Albuquerque, NM. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 18 years of age or older or parents of patients younger than age 18 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics for survey results and mean scores for attitudinal items. Chi-square, t-test, and analysis of variance were used to compare differences between groups across demographic variables. RESULTS: A convenience sample yielded 263 completed surveys. Of the respondents, 62% were male, 39% were single, and 50% were Hispanic. Nearly 56% of respondents used CAMT in the previous 6 months; 38% used CAMT in addition to and 11% used CAMT instead of prescription medications. Average number of CAMT used per respondent was 2.3 ± 1.6. A majority of respondents indicated that their CAMT use in the previous 6 months was useful, a good idea, easy to use, and likely to continue. CAMT use was significantly higher in female respondents (p = 0.03), those with a higher education level (p < 0.01), and those with a higher household income level (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of CAMT is high in a diverse population of patients. Older respondents were more likely to use CAMT in addition to prescription medications, and younger respondents were more likely to use CAMT instead of prescription medications. Providers need to consider CAMT use when discussing treatment options with patients.
Assuntos
Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Mexico/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine health care costs associated with pressure ulcers, ulcers of the lower limbs, other chronic ulcers, and venous leg ulcers from the New Mexico Medicaid fee-for-service program perspective. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of claims database MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician visit, hospital, and prescription costs were determined for New Mexico Medicaid patients with a primary and/or secondary diagnosis of 1 of 4 identified categories of skin ulcers from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 1998. Costs were determined in terms of mean and median annual cost per patient and total costs per year. Zero dollar claims were included within the cost calculations. All costs are expressed in 2000-dollar values. MAIN RESULTS: Mean annual physician visit costs per patient ranged from $71 (standard deviation [SD] = $60) for venous leg ulcers in 1998 to $520 (SD = $1228) for pressure ulcers in 1996. Mean annual hospital costs per patient ranged from $266 (SD = $348) for other chronic ulcers in 1998 to $15,760 (SD = $30,706) for pressure ulcers in 1998. Mean annual prescription costs per patient ranged from $145 (SD = $282) for other chronic ulcers in 1998 to $654 (SD = $1488) for pressure ulcers in 1994. CONCLUSION: The New Mexico Medicaid fee-for-service system incurred a total cost of approximately $11.6 million (in 2000 dollars) from 1994 through 1998 for the treatment of the 4 categories of skin ulcers studied. The data showed that the majority of wounds were coded as pressure ulcers, which had the highest associated costs.