RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate distribution profiles of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) as candidate markers of familial hypercholesterolemia in newborns, taking into consideration potential confounding factors, such as gestational age, birth weight, sex, and race. STUDY DESIGN: TC, LDL-C, and apoB were measured from 10â000 residual deidentified newborn dried blood spot cards. Concentrations for each biomarker were reported as multiples of the median, with emphasis on describing the 99th percentile values based on birth weight, gestational age, sex, and race. Seasonal variation of biomarkers was also explored. RESULTS: LDL-C and apoB had distribution curves with tails showing extreme elevation, whereas the distribution of TC was less elevated and had the smallest range. Neonates born at early gestational age and low birth weight had significantly greater 99th percentile of multiples of the median values for apoB but not TC or LDL-C. Differences in biomarker concentration based on sex and race were minimal. All biomarkers showed greatest concentrations in the winter as compared with summer months. CONCLUSIONS: LDL-C and apoB had distribution curves supporting candidacy for neonatal familial hypercholesterolemia screening. Future studies are needed to correlate newborn screening results with molecular testing to validate these 2 biomarkers, along with measured cholesterol levels later in childhood.
Assuntos
Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , LDL-Colesterol , Peso ao Nascer , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Apolipoproteínas BRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess contemporary practice patterns of pediatric cardiologists with respect to cholesterol disorders and smoking-related illness. STUDY DESIGN: We sent 2 anonymous surveys to the members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery and the Pediheart online community. The surveys addressed training in and management of cholesterol disorders and smoking-related illness. RESULTS: There were 97 responses to the cholesterol disorders survey. A total of 51.6% reported little or no formal training on cholesterol disorders. A total of 56.4% underestimated the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia by at least twofold. A total of 54.7% were at least somewhat comfortable prescribing statins. In 5 clinical vignettes, respondents frequently gave clinical recommendations in line with the 2019 American Heart Association guidelines although both undertreatment and overtreatment were recommended. There were 90 responses to the survey on smoking-related illness. Little or no formal training in nicotine addiction (52.3%) or smoking cessation (60.5%) was reported by respondents. Respondents screened for tobacco use in less than a one-third of hospitalizations and less than two-thirds of outpatient clinic visits. Screening for exposure to secondhand smoke was even less common. Twenty-seven percent of respondents never recommend a household smoking ban for their patients. A total of 83.3% were uncomfortable prescribing medications for their patients for smoking cessation, and 65.5% rarely or never refer patients for smoking cessation assistance. CONCLUSION: Although positioned to address the childhood origins of adult heart disease, those cardiologists surveyed placed a limited emphasis on cholesterol disorders and smoking-related disease in their clinical practice.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Cardiopatias , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , ColesterolRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and HDL-C thresholds for pediatric nonfasting lipid screens that are more predictive of the need for lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and estimate numbers of potentially avoidable fasting lipid panels. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective review of children and youths aged 8-21 years presenting for preventive cardiology care, initial lipid results, recommendations for pharmacotherapy, and presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors were noted. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis calculated threshold lipid values predicting the need for pharmacotherapy and were applied to 2 screening populations. Rates of potentially unnecessary fasting lipid panels were calculated. RESULTS: A non-HDL-C value >156 mg/dL for children with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors and >199 mg/dL for children without risk factors conferred 95% or greater sensitivity in predicting a recommendation for pharmacotherapy with higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with current guidelines. HDL-C was a poor predictor of pharmacotherapy. Application of the current thresholds to screening populations indicated that 38.5%-92.3% of follow-up fasting lipid panels would not result in pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Using higher non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C thresholds could prevent unnecessary follow-up lipid panels and reduce patient anxiety, cost, and time. This could improve compliance with universal pediatric lipid screening for both health care providers and families.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Hipolipemiantes/administração & dosagem , Lipídeos/normas , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/complicações , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Padrões de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the release of national guidelines, electronic health record (EHR) modifications, and educational initiatives correlated with changes in pediatricians' universal lipid screening practices. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of EHRs in an academic general pediatric practice was performed to measure the prevalence of order placement. A child was "screened" if an order was placed during a well-visit between 9 and 21 years of age. The prevalence of order placement for lipid screens on 22 374 patients from January 2010 to December 2015 was analyzed for date of order and patient age, then compared with timing of guidelines, local educational initiatives, and EHR modifications. Primary study outcome was lipid screening order placement over time. RESULTS: Order placement increased from 8.9% (95% CI 8.3%-9.5%) before any intervention to 50.0% (95% CI 48.8%-51.2%) over the last 12 months of the study period (P < .001). All age groups showed significant increases in order placement. Changes in screening were seen following guideline publications, educational initiatives, and EHR modifications (for all, P < .0001). Order completion was 69.6% (95% CI 68.9%-70.3%). The composite prevalence of screening (order placement multiplied by order completion) was 46.8% over the 6-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Improved adherence to recommendations for universal lipid screening is possible through educational initiatives and EHR modifications. Inclusion of 12- to 16-year-old adolescents/teenagers as a targeted group for universal screening in addition to recommended age groups improved screening prevalence. Similar efforts could be applicable for implementation of other guidelines.
Assuntos
Lipídeos/sangue , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Charts of 42 children with familial hypercholesterolemia from a dyslipidemia clinic were reviewed for initial cholesterol screen indication and cascade screening results. Indications were universal screening (8/28 after guideline release, none before), family history (26/42), risk factor (5/42), and other (3/42). Cascade screening identified 63 relatives with unknown familial hypercholesterolemia.