Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 33(4): 472-7, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18582233

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymphocyte proliferation testing (LPT) has some advantages over patch testing to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis. It is harmless, objective and can be used in clinical situations where patch testing is not recommended. Unfortunately, significant success has only been achieved with nickel. There are few studies on chromium LPT and they were performed with different methods, leading to inconsistent results. METHODS: To determine the best parameters for chromium LPT, we tested 20 patients with allergic contact dermatitis to the metal and 20 controls, using various protocols. RESULTS: The best sensitivity and specificity ratios were achieved with 6-day cultures stimulated with a range from 7.5 x 10(-4) to 5 x 10(-3) mol/L of nonfiltered chromium chloride solutions. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values found within this range were 65%, 95% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is necessary to achieve better sensitivity values.


Assuntos
Cromo , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Adulto , Cromo/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Humanos , Ativação Linfocitária , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA