RESUMO
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death among people living with HIV (PLWH). Limited TB knowledge has been associated with delayed TB diagnosis and low adherence to TB treatment. A cross-sectional study was conducted among PLWH at the largest HIV-referral center in Lima, Peru, to describe TB knowledge among PLWH and potential associated sociodemographic factors. Participants answered a self-administered survey on TB knowledge, which consisted of five questions about TB cure, transmission, treatment, symptoms, and prevention. Of 179 PLWH enrolled, most participants did not know that isoniazid (85%) and antiretrovirals (78%) are preventive measures for TB, and 56 (31.3%) knew that TB can be asymptomatic in PLWH. We did not find statistical differences in TB knowledge based on gender, education, marital status, and time on HIV care. We identified important gaps in TB knowledge among PLWH. Addressing these gaps could empower PLWH to reduce their TB risk.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Tuberculose , Humanos , Peru/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Estudos Transversais , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Peru's health infrastructures, particularly hospitals, are exposed to disaster threats of different natures. Traditionally, earthquakes have been the main disaster in terms of physical and structural vulnerability, but the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has also shown their functional vulnerability. Public hospitals in Lima are very different in terms of year constructed, type of construction, and number of floors, making them highly vulnerable to earthquakes. In addition, they are subject to a high demand for care daily. Therefore, if a major earthquake were to occur in Lima, the hospitals would not have the capacity to respond to the high demand. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the Hospital Safety Index (HSI) in hospitals in Lima (Peru). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study of 18 state-run hospitals that met the inclusion criteria; open access data were collected for the indicators proposed by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Version 1. Associations between variables were calculated using the chi-square test, considering a confidence level of 95%. A P value less than .05 was considered to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: The average bed occupancy rate was 90%, the average age was 70 years, on average had one bed per 25,126 inhabitants, and HSI average score was 0.36 with a vulnerability of 0.63. No association was found between HSI and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSION: Most of the hospitals were considered Category C in earthquake and disaster safety, and only one hospital was Category A. The hospital situation needs to be clarified, and the specific deficiencies of each institution need to be identified and addressed according to their own characteristics and context.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Planejamento em Desastres , Desastres , Humanos , Idoso , Peru/epidemiologia , Hospitais Estaduais , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , HospitaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In Peru, the estimated prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) co-infection has been reported to be as high as 18%. Despite the endemicity of HTLV-1 in Peru, few studies have assessed the impact of HIV/HTLV-1 co-infection. Our study compared socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and mortality rates between HIV-infected and HIV/HTLV-1 co-infected patients. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients aged 18 years and older belonging to the HIV and HTLV-1 cohorts in Lima during a 30-year period: 1989-2019. Each HIV/HTLV-1 co-infected patient was randomly matched with two HIV-infected patients with similar characteristics (same sex, age ± 5 years, and same year of HIV diagnosis). Allegedly co-infected patients without a confirmatory diagnosis of HIV and HTLV-1 were excluded. Most of the patients in the HIV-infected group did not have a negative test result for HTLV-1 infection, so we used two probabilistic sensitivity analysis models to correct for potential HTLV-1 exposure misclassification bias in the group of HIV-infected patients. RESULTS: Of 162 patients enrolled, 54 were HIV/HTLV-1 co-infected and 108 were HIV-infected. The median age was 42 years (IQR = 34-51 years) and the majority were male (61.1%), single (44.4%), heterosexual (71%), born in Lima (58%), educated at the secondary school level (55.6%), and receiving antiretroviral treatment (91.4%). HIV/HTLV-1 co-infection was associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 11.8; 95% CI: 1.55-89.00; p = 0.017) while antiretroviral treatment was associated with a decreased risk of death (HR: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.003-0.25; p = 0.001). The overall mortality rate was 13.6 per 100 persons and the survival time for co-infected patients (median = 14.19 years) was significantly shorter than that of HIV-infected patients (median = 23.83 years) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HIV/HTLV-1 co-infected patients had a significantly shorter survival time compared to HIV-infected patients, suggesting that the immune alterations caused by HTLV-1 in CD4 cell count may have contributed to late initiation of antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis against opportunistic infections over the decades, and thus reducing their benefits in these patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Universidades , Percepção , Peru/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objetivos: Determinar la validez de la evaluación de consumo de alcohol realizado en la Estrategia Nacional de Salud para la Prevención y Control de ITS-VIH / SIDA (ESNITSS) a pacientes con VIH que iniciaron tratamiento antirretroviral (TARV). Material y métodos: El tipo de estudio fue de evaluación de prueba diagnóstica en pacientes en TARV de un hospital del Ministerio de Salud (MINSA), entre septiembre de 2017 y enero de 2018; en base al análisis de datos de la Fase I del estudio "Efectividad de la Consejería en Enfermería en la Mejora de la Adherencia al TARV en pacientes con VIH y Conducta de Consumo de Alcohol". 4000 pacientes conformaron la población de estudio y 350 pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente. Se procedió a la validación de la evaluación del consumo de alcohol realizado por la ESNITSS con dos Gold estándar: i. la evaluación del consumo de alcohol en el último mes y ii. el consumo de riesgo identificado con el Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Se calculó sensibilidad, especificidad, seguridad de la evaluación y razones de probabilidad. Resultados: La sensibilidad y especificidad fue regular para la evaluación de consumo de alcohol en el último mes (S=0,64, E=0,57), la especificidad fue mala para la evaluación de consumo de riesgo (E=0,48). Las razones de verosimilitud positivas demuestraron que la evaluación no tiene utilidad diagnóstica para ninguno de los casos (<2). Conclusiones: La evaluación de "consumo actual de alcohol" realizada por la ESNITSS no mostró utilidad diagnóstica.
SUMMARY Objectives: To determine the validity of the evaluation of alcohol consumption established by the national strategy to prevent and control STI-HIV-AIDS (ESNITSS) of HIV-infected adults that started anti-retroviral treatment (ART). Methods: Diagnostic study of HIV patients in a single hospital in Lima from September 2017 to January 2018 using data from a phase one study "Effectiveness of nursing counseling in improving adherence to ART among patient with alcohol consumption". Three hundred and fifty patients were randomly selected among 4000 participants. Two gold standards evaluated alcohol consumption: 1. Last month alcohol consumption and ii; alcohol consumption identified by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Sensitivity, specificity, safety of the evaluation and probability rates. Results: sensitivity and specificity were moderate for last month alcohol consumption (s=0.64; e=0.57); specificity was low for evaluation of consumption risk (e=0.48). Positive validity rates demonstrated that the evaluation is not useful (<2). Conclusions: The evaluation of alcohol consumption followed by the ESNITSS has no diagnostic utility.
RESUMO
A cross-sectional study was carried out on medical students from a private Peruvian university. The aim was to describe knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 as well as the student's perception of the role of media outlets and social media. Of the students, 32% did not know that during the first five days of illness, serological tests are preferred for diagnosing COVID-19 over molecular tests; 73% reported being willing to work as a volunteer during the pandemic, and 94% received false information regarding COVID-19 on social media. This study demonstrated that information regarding diagnostic tests should be reinforced and that the high percentage of students willing to volunteer during the COVID-19 pandemic should not be overlooked.
Se realizó un estudio transversal en estudiantes de Medicina de una universidad privada de Lima. El objetivo fue describir el nivel de conocimientos y las actitudes sobre la COVID-19, además de su percepción sobre el rol de los medios de comunicación y de las redes sociales. El 32% no sabía que en los primeros cinco días de la enfermedad, las pruebas serológicas son preferibles para diagnosticar la COVID-19, comparadas con las pruebas moleculares; el 73% reportó estar dispuesto a trabajar como voluntario durante la pandemia y el 94% recibió información falsa sobre la COVID-19 en las redes sociales. Este estudio demuestra que la información sobre el uso de pruebas diagnósticas debe ser reforzada y que se debe tomar en cuenta el alto porcentaje de estudiantes dispuestos a ser voluntarios durante la pandemia de la COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudantes de Medicina , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Percepção , Peru , Inquéritos e Questionários , UniversidadesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Systemic pentavalent antimonials, mainly meglumine antimoniate, continue to be the first-choice drugs for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) despite their toxicity, difficulty of administration and high cost. In the search for therapeutic alternatives, combining two treatment interventions has emerged as a potential alternative to either reduce the use of antimonials with the associated toxicities, or to increase efficacy. Here, we report the results of a recently completed trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a combination of thermotherapy (TT) plus a short course of miltefosine (MLT) for the treatment of uncomplicated CL in Colombia and Peru. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, phase II, controled clinical trial was conducted. Adult volunteers with a parasitologically confirmed diagnosis of uncomplicated CL were randomly allocated to receive either a single session of TT or a combination of TT plus a short course of MLT (3 weeks). Therapeutic response outcomes and safety were assessed. RESULTS: 130 subjects were included in the study, of whom 64 were randomly assigned to the TT arm and 66 to the TT + MLT arm. Cure at 3 months' follow-up was achieved in 57.8% (n = 37) and 80.3% (n = 53) in the TT and TT + MLT groups, respectively, in the intention to treat analysis. The TT + MLT regimen was better that TT alone (p = 0.0055). The presence of vesicles at the site of heat application was the most common adverse event reported associated with the use of TT; while vomiting (31.8%) and elevation of liver enzymes (28.8%) were the most frequent adverse events reported associated with the use of MLT. CONCLUSION: The combination of TT plus a short course of MLT was shown to be significantly better than TT alone for the treatment of uncomplicated CL in the New World. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT02687971.
Assuntos
Antiprotozoários , Hipertermia Induzida , Leishmaniose Cutânea , Compostos Organometálicos , Adulto , Antiprotozoários/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Leishmaniose Cutânea/tratamento farmacológico , Leishmaniose Cutânea/etiologia , Meglumina/uso terapêutico , Antimoniato de Meglumina/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
RESUMEN Se realizó un estudio transversal en estudiantes de Medicina de una universidad privada de Lima. El objetivo fue describir el nivel de conocimientos y las actitudes sobre la COVID-19, además de su percepción sobre el rol de los medios de comunicación y de las redes sociales. El 32% no sabía que en los primeros cinco días de la enfermedad, las pruebas serológicas son preferibles para diagnosticar la COVID-19, comparadas con las pruebas moleculares; el 73% reportó estar dispuesto a trabajar como voluntario durante la pandemia y el 94% recibió información falsa sobre la COVID-19 en las redes sociales. Este estudio demuestra que la información sobre el uso de pruebas diagnósticas debe ser reforzada y que se debe tomar en cuenta el alto porcentaje de estudiantes dispuestos a ser voluntarios durante la pandemia de la COVID-19.
ABSTRACT A cross-sectional study was carried out on medical students from a private Peruvian university. The aim was to describe knowledge and attitudes towards COVID-19 as well as the student's perception of the role of media outlets and social media. Of the students, 32% did not know that during the first five days of illness, serological tests are preferred for diagnosing COVID-19 over molecular tests; 73% reported being willing to work as a volunteer during the pandemic, and 94% received false information regarding COVID-19 on social media. This study demonstrated that information regarding diagnostic tests should be reinforced and that the high percentage of students willing to volunteer during the COVID-19 pandemic should not be overlooked.
Assuntos
Estudantes de Medicina , Meios de Comunicação , Conhecimento , COVID-19 , Voluntários , Atitude , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , MedicinaRESUMO
This study aims to describe knowledge on HIV and antiretroviral (ARV) treatment and psychosocial factors among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Lima, Perú, to explore characteristics associated to this knowledge, and determine its impact on sustained viral suppression. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 171 PLWH at the largest referral health care center in Lima. The psychosocial factors measured were depression, risk of alcoholism, use of illegal drugs and disclosure. A participant had "poor knowledge" when less than 80% of replies were correct. Sustained viral suppression was defined as two consecutive viral loads under 50 copies/mL. A total of 49% and 43% had poor HIV and ARV knowledge respectively; 48% of the study population screened positive for depression and 27% reported feeling unsupported by the person they disclosed to. The largest gaps in HIV and ARV knowledge were among 98 (57%) that did not recognize that HIV increased the risk of cancer and among 57 (33%) participants that did not disagree with the statement that taking a double dose of ARV if they missed one. Moderate depression was significantly associated to poor HIV and ARV knowledge. Non-disclosure and being on ARVs for less than 6 months were associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression. Our findings highlight important HIV and ARV knowledge gaps of PLWH and a high burden of psychosocial problems, especially of depression, among PLWH in Lima, Peru. Increasing knowledge and addressing depression and disclosure could improve care of PLWH.