Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(3): 554-564, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728970

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that the subventricular zone (SVZ) may be involved in both the initiation and progression of glioblastoma (GB). We aimed to assess tumor proximity to the SVZ as a potential prognostic factor in GB. METHOD: Retrospective study of 133 patients diagnosed with primary GB who underwent surgery followed by temozolomide-based chemoradiation between 2010 and 2016. All lesions were classified according to their anatomic relation with the SVZ. We determined the effect of tumor contact with the SVZ on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), type, and patterns of recurrence. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18.6 months (95% CI 15.9-21.2), PFS and OS were 7.5 (95% CI 6.7-8.3) and 13.9 (95% CI 10.9-16.9) months, respectively. On the univariate analyses, initial contact with the SVZ was a factor for poor prognosis for both PFS (6.1 vs. 8.7 months; p = 0.006) and OS (10.6 vs. 17.9 months; p = 0.037). On the multivariate analysis, tumor contact with the SVZ remained statistically significant for PFS, but not OS. Patients with SVZ-contacting tumors presented a higher rate of aggressive clinical progression (30.9% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.007) and contralateral relapse patterns (23.4% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that glioblastoma contact with the SVZ appears to be an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS. The presence of an SVZ-contacting tumor was associated with more aggressive recurrences and a higher rate of contralateral relapses. These findings suggest that this variable may be a new prognostic factor in glioblastoma.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Glioblastoma/patologia , Ventrículos Laterais/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioblastoma/etiologia , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Temozolomida/uso terapêutico
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(3): 411-419, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31144211

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We performed a cross-sectional study of neurocognitive function in non-brain cancer patients treated with long-term bevacizumab. METHODS/PATIENTS: From 2015 to 2017, we included patients with different types of cancer treated with bevacizumab with or without chemotherapy (BEV; N = 20) or only chemotherapy (ChT; N = 19) for at least 34 weeks, patients who received non-brain radiotherapy (RxT; N = 19), and healthy controls (HC; N = 19) were assessed once at week 34 of treatment (BEV and ChT) or at completion of radiotherapy. Neurocognition was evaluated with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) total and delayed recall, the Trail Making Test A and B, and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test in the four groups. Non-parametric tests were used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: The BEV, ChT, and RxT groups scored significantly lower than the HC group on all tests and especially on the HVLT-R total recall. In no case were the mean scores of the BEV group significantly lower than those of the ChT or RxT groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive impairment was seen even in patients treated with local non-brain radiotherapy. Treatment with bevacizumab for a long period of time does not seem to worsen neurocognitive function to a greater extent than chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/diagnóstico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/etiologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(12): 1529-1537, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29737461

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We retrospectively examined the potential effect on overall survival (OS) of delaying radiotherapy to administer neoadjuvant therapy in unresected glioblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared OS in 119 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by standard treatment (NA group) and 96 patients receiving standard treatment without neoadjuvant therapy (NoNA group). The MaxStat package of R identified the optimal cut-off point for waiting time to radiotherapy. RESULTS: OS was similar in the NA and NoNA groups. Median waiting time to radiotherapy after surgery was 13 weeks for the NA group and 4.2 weeks for the NoNA group. The longest OS was attained by patients who started radiotherapy after 12 weeks and the shortest by patients who started radiotherapy within 4 weeks (12.3 vs 6.6 months) (P = 0.05). OS was 6.6 months for patients who started radiotherapy before the optimal cutoff of 6.43 weeks and 19.1 months for those who started after this time (P = 0.005). Patients who completed radiotherapy had longer OS than those who did not, in all 215 patients and in the NA and NoNA groups (P = 0.000). In several multivariate analyses, completing radiotherapy was a universally favorable prognostic factor, while neoadjuvant therapy was never identified as a negative prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In our series of unresected patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, in spite of the delay in starting radiotherapy, OS was not inferior to that of a similar group of patients with no delay in starting radiotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Glioblastoma/terapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(1): 89-96, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230692

RESUMO

Cancer of unknown primary site is a histologically confirmed cancer that manifests in advanced stage, with no identifiable primary site following standard diagnostic procedures. Patients are initially categorized based on the findings of the initial biopsy: adenocarcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and poorly differentiated carcinoma. Appropriate patient management requires understanding several clinical and pathological features that aid in identifying several subsets of patients with more responsive tumors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/patologia , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/terapia , Humanos
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 19(6): 727-734, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28005261

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We assessed agreement among neurosurgeons on surgical approaches to individual glioblastoma patients and between their approach and those recommended by the topographical staging system described by Shinoda. METHODS: Five neurosurgeons were provided with pre-surgical MRIs of 76 patients. They selected the surgical approach [biopsy, partial resection, or gross total resection (GTR)] that they would recommend for each patient. They were blinded to each other's response and they were told that patients were younger than 50 years old and without symptoms. Three neuroradiologists classified each case according to the Shinoda staging system. RESULTS: Biopsy was recommended in 35.5-82.9%, partial resection in 6.6-32.9%, and GTR in 3.9-31.6% of cases. Agreement among their responses was fair (global kappa = 0.28). Nineteen patients were classified as stage I, 14 as stage II, and 43 as stage III. Agreement between the neurosurgeons and the recommendations of the staging system was poor for stage I (kappa = 0.14) and stage II (kappa = 0.02) and fair for stage III patients (kappa = 0.29). An individual analysis revealed that in contrast to the Shinoda system, neurosurgeons took into account T2/FLAIR sequences and gave greater weight to the involvement of eloquent areas. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical approach to glioblastoma is highly variable. A staging system could be used to examine the impact of extent of resection, monitor post-operative complications, and stratify patients in clinical trials. Our findings suggest that the Shinoda staging system could be improved by including T2/FLAIR sequences and a more adequate weighting of eloquent areas.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/normas , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Glioblastoma/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurocirurgiões/normas , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 18(12): 1221-1228, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896638

RESUMO

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract, and this disease has served as a paradigmatic model for successful rational development of targeted therapies. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/PDGFRA in both localized and advanced stages has remarkably improved the survival in a disease formerly deemed resistant to all systemic therapies. The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines provide a multidisciplinary and updated consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of GIST patients. We strongly encourage that the managing of these patients should be performed within multidisciplinary teams in reference centers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Espanha
7.
Water Sci Technol ; 54(10): 39-45, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17165446

RESUMO

This work presents a comparison of two inocula used for the acclimation of two anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch bioreactors used for toxic wastewater treatment. The bioreactors were acclimated with different types of sludge: one coming from an anaerobic wastewater treatment plant and the other one from a conventional aerobic activated sludge plant. The model toxic compound was p-nitrophenol, which is reduced to p-aminophenol during the initial anaerobic phase of the reaction, and later mineralized during a posterior aerated reaction phase. Biodegradation of the compounds was monitored using UV/Vis spectrophotometry. After acclimation stabilization of the sludge and of the process was also monitored. Results show that there is no significant difference in acclimation times and stability of the process between the two employed inocula, and thus an originally anaerobic inoculum presents no apparent advantage over a more easily accessible aerobic one.


Assuntos
Reatores Biológicos , Nitrofenóis/metabolismo , Esgotos , Aerobiose , Anaerobiose , Biodegradação Ambiental , Nitrofenóis/química , Esgotos/microbiologia , Bactérias Redutoras de Enxofre/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA