Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthodont ; 30(8): 690-697, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245170

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the fatigue survival, fracture loads and failure modes of monolithic lithium disilicate screw-retained crowns, attached to titanium insert, and cement-retained crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Internal tapered connection implants, embedded in acrylic resin at 30° inclination, were restored with lithium disilicate restorations, simulating a maxillary premolar (n = 20), with different designs: screw-retained titanium base abutment-crowns, and cement-retained crowns. The specimens were submitted to cyclic mechanical loading (1.2 × 106 cycles with a load of 0-250 N at 2 Hz). Surviving specimens were subjected to single load to fracture in a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined with the aid of an optical microscope. Maximum load values were analyzed statistically using the t-test and differences in failure modes were analyzed using the chi-squared test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: All specimens survived the cyclic mechanical loading. Fracture load was significantly higher for screw-retained crowns (821.69 ±196.71 N) than the cement-retained crowns (577.03 ± 137.75 N) (p = 0.005). Ceramic failure was the predominant mode, with no statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-retained and cement-retained lithium disilicate crowns survived the cyclic mechanical loading. The use of titanium inserts to support a monolithic restoration enhances the fracture strength of the crown/abutment system.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Parafusos Ósseos , Cerâmica , Coroas , Porcelana Dentária , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Teste de Materiais , Zircônio
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA