RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of clinical specialty setting on the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as well as disease activity/burden in Brazil. METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of the Brazilian population in a cross-sectional, observational study conducted in 17 countries. Patients were 18 years or older with suspected or confirmed PsA attending routine visits at participating sites. Primary end points were time from symptom onset to PsA diagnosis, from diagnosis to first conventional systemic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) or first biologic DMARD, and from first conventional systemic DMARD to first biologic DMARD. Potential associations were assessed using the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test. Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. For qualitative variables, the χ2 test was adopted. RESULTS: Patients (n = 130) visited dermatology (n = 75) or rheumatology (n = 55) sites. All primary end points were similar between the 2 settings; however, dermatology patients had significantly greater enthesitis counts (2.1 vs 0.6; p = 0.002), absenteeism at work (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, 19.7% vs 5.2%; p = 0.03), and pain (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index pain scale, 1.39 vs 1.01; p = 0.032), as well as worse quality of life related to psoriasis (Dermatology Life Quality Index total score, 8.5 vs 5.0; p = 0.019) and mental health (12-item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2.0 subscale, 42.4 vs 47.4; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, PsA disease burden and disease activity were influenced by clinical specialty. Irrespective of setting, patients experienced a delay in being diagnosed with PsA, reinforcing the need for collaborative management of PsA by rheumatologists and dermatologists for better outcomes in these patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with a significant negative impact on the quality of life of patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to assess current treatment for HS, with a special focus on therapies approved or used in Brazil. We used the PICO framework to improve the research process. The systematic review was reported in line with the PRISMA statement checklist. The search was conducted with clinical questions on two global databases (PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar) and three databases especially selected to retrieve Brazilian outcomes (BVS, SCIELO and REDALYC). RESULTS: Overall, 4640 articles were screened, 182 articles were analysed and 70 were used in a thematic qualitative analysis. Of these, 12 articles were from Brazil. The evidence-based literature was largely limited to case reports, case series, observational studies and expert opinion. Topical therapy, lifestyle interventions and oral antibiotics appeared as effective measures for mild HS. However, moderate-to-severe HS remains refractory to conventional treatments. CONCLUSION: Some biologic agents, such as adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and secukinumab, have been shown to be effective in the management of moderate-to-severe HS that failed conventional treatment and demonstrated a good tolerability and safety profile.