Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 9075, 2020 06 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493970

RESUMO

Agriculture, forestry and other land uses are currently the second highest source of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions. In soil, these gases derive from microbial activity, during carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling. To investigate how Eucalyptus land use and growth period impact the microbial community, GHG fluxes and inorganic N levels, and if there is a link among these variables, we monitored three adjacent areas for 9 months: a recently planted Eucalyptus area, fully developed Eucalyptus forest (final of rotation) and native forest. We assessed the microbial community using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR of key genes involved in C and N cycles. No considerable differences in GHG flux were evident among the areas, but logging considerably increased inorganic N levels. Eucalyptus areas displayed richer and more diverse communities, with selection for specific groups. Land use influenced communities more extensively than the time of sampling or growth phase, although all were significant modulators. Several microbial groups and genes shifted temporally, and inorganic N levels shaped several of these changes. No correlations among microbial groups or genes and GHG were found, suggesting no link among these variables in this short-rotation Eucalyptus study.


Assuntos
Eucalyptus/fisiologia , Células Procarióticas/fisiologia , Solo/química , Agricultura/métodos , Carbono/química , Carbono/metabolismo , Dióxido de Carbono/química , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Eucalyptus/genética , Eucalyptus/metabolismo , Agricultura Florestal/métodos , Florestas , Gases de Efeito Estufa/química , Gases de Efeito Estufa/metabolismo , Nitrogênio/química , Nitrogênio/metabolismo , Óxido Nitroso/química , Óxido Nitroso/metabolismo , Células Procarióticas/metabolismo , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Rotação
2.
Microb Ecol ; 75(1): 183-191, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28634640

RESUMO

Eucalyptus plantations offer a cost-effective and renewable source of raw material. There is substantial interest in improving forestry production, especially through sustainable strategies such as the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria. However, little is known about Eucalyptus microbiology. In this study, the endophytic bacterial community was assessed in Eucalyptus urograndis roots using culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques with plants grown under different conditions. Three phyla accounted for approximately 95% of the community, with Actinobacteria corresponding to approximately 59%. This contrasts with previous studies in which Actinobacteria accounted for only 5 to 10%. Our data also revealed a high diversity of bacteria, with 359 different genera but a high level of dominance. Six genera, Mycobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Streptomyces, Bacillus, Actinospica, and Burkholderia, accounted for more than 50% of the classified sequences. We observed a significant influence of the treatments on some genera, causing changes in the bacterial community structure. The obtained data also suggest that Eucalyptus may benefit from biological nitrogen fixation, with many abundant genera being closely related to nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Using N-depleted media, we also cultured 95 bacterial isolates, of which 24 tested positive for the nifH gene and were able to maintain growth without any N source in the medium.


Assuntos
Bactérias/metabolismo , Endófitos/metabolismo , Eucalyptus/microbiologia , Microbiota , Fixação de Nitrogênio , Raízes de Plantas/microbiologia , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Endófitos/classificação , Endófitos/genética , Endófitos/isolamento & purificação , Filogenia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Microbiologia do Solo
3.
Microb Ecol ; 75(1): 192, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196844

RESUMO

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in the first author's name and the running page headers.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA