Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(5): 1803-1809, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876005

RESUMO

The use of antimicrobial growth promoters in chicken farming has been commonly associated with high levels of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in humans. Most of this work, however, has been focused on intensive large-scale operations. Intensive small-scale farming that regularly uses antibiotics is increasing worldwide and has different exposure pathways compared with large-scale farming, most notably the spatial connection between chickens and households. In these communities, free-ranging backyard chickens (not fed antibiotics) can roam freely, whereas broiler chickens (fed antibiotics) are reared in the same husbandry environment but confined to coops. We conducted an observational field study to better understand the spatial distribution of AMR in communities that conduct small-scale farming in northwestern Ecuador. We analyzed phenotypic resistance of Escherichia coli sampled from humans and backyard chickens to 12 antibiotics in relation to the distance to the nearest small-scale farming operation within their community. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between the distance of a household to small-scale farming and antibiotic-resistant E. coli isolated from chicken or human samples. To help explain this result, we monitored the movement of backyard chickens and found they were on average 17 m (min-max: 0-59 m) from their household at any given time. These backyard chickens on average ranged further than the average distance from any study household to its closest neighbor. This level of connectivity provides a viable mechanism for the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and genes throughout the community.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Galinhas , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Animais , Demografia , Equador , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Atividade Motora
2.
J Parasitol ; 95(1): 39-45, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19245281

RESUMO

During a parasite survey, we collected data on the presence and distribution of feather mites, intestinal parasites, and blood parasites of small ground finches (Geospiza fuliginosa) from 4 islands in the Galapagos. We recorded 4 species of feather mites, with the most common species, Trouessartia geospiza, present on the majority (77% [308/400]) of individuals. Birds with high loads of T. geospiza came from larger islands and had higher body masses. We identified 3 species of intestinal Isospora (Isospora fragmenta, Isospora temeraria, and Isospora exigua) in fecal samples that showed a diurnal pattern of oocyst release. Among samples collected in the afternoon, infection prevalence was 61% (11/18), while only 0.5% (1/192) contained oocysts in the morning. We screened 40 individuals from one island (Isabela) for blood parasites using molecular markers. Although no parasites of Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, or Plasmodium were detected, a high proportion of birds (80% [32/40]) had systemic Isospora spp. infections. A high infection prevalence (74% [20/27]), but low infection intensity, was confirmed using optical microscopy. This result could either be due to the detection of a previously unidentified systemic Isospora sp. parasite, or a result of the previously described Isospora spp. parasites causing systemic infections.


Assuntos
Doenças das Aves/parasitologia , Plumas/parasitologia , Tentilhões/parasitologia , Enteropatias Parasitárias/veterinária , Isosporíase/veterinária , Infestações por Ácaros/veterinária , Animais , Doenças das Aves/epidemiologia , Tamanho Corporal , Equador/epidemiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Interações Hospedeiro-Parasita , Enteropatias Parasitárias/epidemiologia , Enteropatias Parasitárias/parasitologia , Isospora/isolamento & purificação , Isosporíase/epidemiologia , Isosporíase/parasitologia , Infestações por Ácaros/epidemiologia , Infestações por Ácaros/parasitologia , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Parasitemia/parasitologia , Parasitemia/veterinária , Prevalência
3.
J Parasitol ; 91(6): 1304-13, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16539009

RESUMO

In collections of ectoparasites from 368 small ground finches, Geospiza fuliginosa, in populations from the islands of Isabela, Santa Cruz, San Cristóbal, and Santa Fé, in the Galápagos Archipelago, Ecuador, we found 8 species of mites. Four mite species were common on all islands sampled, i.e., Mesalgoides geospizae Mironov and Pérez (Psoroptoididae), Xolalges palmai Mironov and Pérez (Xolalgidae), and 2 new species, Trouessartia geospiza n. sp. (Trouessartiidae) and Proctophyllodes darwini n. sp. (Proctophyllodidae). Four other species were represented by single collections from G. fuliginosa, i.e., Pterodectes atyeoi n. sp. (Proctophyllodidae), Strelkoviacarus sp. (Analgidae), Dermoglyphus sp. (Dermoglyphidae), and Dermanyssus sp. (Dermanyssidae). Authorship of new species names is attributed to the 3 authors who prepared the descriptions (B.M.O.C., J.F., D.L.). Trouessartia geospiza and P. atyeoi were also found on previously collected specimens of other Geospiza species in museum collections. For the 4 common species, we found no differences in prevalence among the 4 island populations, but infection prevalence differed among the 4 species. The mean infection prevalence was high for T. geospizae (89%), moderate for M. geospizae (58%) and X. palmai (44%), and low for P. darwini (26%) in all populations. The feather mite fauna of G. fuliginosa was similar to that of other Geospiza species, and generally related to communities found on other emberizid finches.


Assuntos
Doenças das Aves/parasitologia , Tentilhões/parasitologia , Infestações por Ácaros/veterinária , Ácaros/classificação , Análise de Variância , Animais , Doenças das Aves/epidemiologia , Equador/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Infestações por Ácaros/epidemiologia , Infestações por Ácaros/parasitologia , Ácaros/anatomia & histologia , Prevalência
4.
Proc Biol Sci ; 271(1547): 1513-9, 2004 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15306324

RESUMO

The evolution of parasite resistance can be influenced by the abundance of parasites in the environment. However, it is yet unresolved whether vertebrates change their investment in immune function in response to variation in parasite abundance. Here, we compare parasite abundance in four populations of small ground finches (Geospiza fuliginosa) in the Galapagos archipelago. We predicted that populations exposed to high parasite loads should invest more in immune defence, or alternatively use a different immunological defence strategy. We found that parasite prevalence and/or infection intensity increased with island size. As predicted, birds on large islands had increased concentrations of natural antibodies and mounted a strong specific antibody response faster than birds on smaller islands. By contrast, the magnitude of cell-mediated immune responses decreased with increasing parasite pressure, i.e. on larger islands. The data support the hypothesis that investments into the immune defence are influenced by parasite-mediated selection. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that different immunological defence strategies are optimal in parasite-rich and parasite-poor environments.


Assuntos
Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Imunidade Celular/imunologia , Imunização , Parasitos/fisiologia , Seleção Genética , Aves Canoras/imunologia , Aves Canoras/parasitologia , Análise de Variância , Animais , Anticorpos/sangue , Equador , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Geografia , Interações Hospedeiro-Parasita
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA