RESUMO

Introducción: El tratamiento de las escoliosis de inicio temprano guiado con barras magnéticas permite realizar distracciones no invasivas y ambulatorias. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar nuestra primera serie de casos con escoliosis de inicio temprano tratados con el sistema de barras magnéticas. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de casos tratados con el sistema de barras magnéticas entre 2014 y 2018. Se formaron dos grupos: grupo I (procedimientos primarios con barras magnéticas) y grupo II (conversiones de sistema tradicional a barras magnéticas). Resultados: Se evaluó a 19 pacientes. La edad promedio en el momento de la cirugía era de 7 años y 4 meses, con un seguimiento promedio de 2 años y 7 meses. El grupo I tenía 12 pacientes y el grupo II, 7 pacientes. Los valores angulares promedio preoperatorio y posoperatorio inmediato de la escoliosis fueron 62° y 42°, respectivamente; los de cifosis, 49° y 34°, respectivamente. La distancia T1-T12 fue de 160 a 176 mm. La distancia T1-S1 fue de 285 a 317 mm. Hubo una complicación: protrusión del implante e infección, y fue necesario retirar el material (grupo II). Conclusiones: Los resultados preliminares sugieren que es un método seguro y eficaz. Si bien los resultados a corto y mediano plazo son alentadores, persisten algunos desafíos importantes e incógnitas en relación con el comportamiento mecánico del implante en un seguimiento prolongado. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

---

Introduction: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment with the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) system allows for the use of non-invasive outpatient distractions. The purpose of this study was to assess our first series of EOS patients treated with MCGRs. Materials and methods: We conducted a review of EOS cases treated with MCGRs between 2014 and 2018. The study population was divided into two groups: Group I, patients undergoing primary MCGR insertion; Group II, patients undergoing conversion from conventional growth system to MCGR. Results: The study population consisted of 19 patients. The average age at the time of surgery was 7 years and 4 months, with an average post-operative follow-up of 2 years and 7 months. Group I consisted of 12 patients and Group II of 7 patients. The mean preoperative scoliosis angle was 62° and immediate postoperatively was 42°. The mean preoperative kyphosis angle was 49°and immediate postoperatively was 34°. The average preoperative T1-T12 length was 160mm and immediate postoperatively was 176mm. The average preoperative T1-S1 length was 285mm and immediate postop-eratively was 317mm. There was 1 late complication, an implant protrusion with an associated infection, in a neuropathic scoliosis patient (Group II) who required implant removal. Conclusion: Our preliminary results suggest that the MCGR system is a safe and effective method. Although the short- and medium-term results are encouraging, further studies are warranted to overcome important and unknown challenges regarding the mechanical behavior of the implant in the long term. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Assuntos

Pré-Escolar , Criança , Escoliose , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Ortopédicos

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation, treatments, outcome, complications, and recurrence rate in the surgical and nonsurgical management of spinal aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) in a series of 18 pediatric patients. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2014, we evaluated 18 pediatric patients diagnosed with ABC confirmed by pathology studies. We analyzed clinical and radiological features, non-surgical and surgical treatment, outcome, and complications. RESULTS: The series included 12 male and 6 female patients with a mean age of 10 years and 4 months, with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Location of the ABC was lumbar in 8, cervical in 7, thoracic in 2, and sacral in 1 case. Axial pain was the most common symptom followed by radicular involvement. Surgery was performed in the presence of spine instability or neurological involvement (tumor resection) and in the remaining, nonsurgical treatment (percutaneous intralesional injection of methylprednisolone and calcitonin). Recurrence was observed in 4 patients requiring reintervention. There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: In patients without neurological involvement or spinal instability, nonsurgical treatment is the treatment of choice. Total or subtotal removal combined with posterior instrumented spinal fusion is recommended in cases with a neurological deficit. Both procedures have shown good long-term results.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bracing is used as a valid non-surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to avoid progression of the deformity and thereby surgery. The effect of bracing treatment on quality of life of patients with AIS has been a topic of interest in the international literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life and patient satisfaction during bracing treatment for AIS of a pediatric hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We assessed a total of 43 non-consecutive female patients (mean age at questionnaire, 13 years and 1 month and 10 years and 8 months to 14 years and 5 months; mean period of usage of brace, 1 year and 7 months), with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), older than 10 years of age until skeletal maturity, with a Risser sign less than 3 and scoliosis between 20 and 45°, treated with thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) for a period longer than 6 months, and without other comorbidities or previous surgeries, were evaluated. The patients were administered a previously validated to Spanish questionnaire on quality of life (Brace Questionnaire (BrQ); Grivas TB et al.). BrQ is a validated tool and is considered a disease-specific instrument; its score ranges from 20 to 100 points, and higher BrQ scores are associated with better quality of life. RESULTS: The patients reported using the brace for a mean of 17.6 h daily and for a mean period of 1 year and 7 months at the time of the study. Overall, 72% of the study population reported to be in some way psychologically affected by the brace wearing, 56% felt their basic motor activities were affected, 54% felt socialization with their environment was affected, 46% considered their quality of life deteriorated due to pain, and 40% reported conflicts in the school environment. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIS treated with bracing reported a negative impact (53.5% overall) on quality of life and treatment satisfaction in terms of psychological, motor, social, and school environment aspects. An interdisciplinary approach would be important for the integrated psychosocial care of these patients.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is little consensus on how or when to discontinue bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). An expert spine surgeon national survey could aid in elucidate discontinuation of the brace.Few data have been published on when and how to discontinue bracing treatment in patients with AIS resulting in differences in the management of the condition. The aim of this study was to characterize decision-making of surgeons in the management of bracing discontinuation in AIS. METHODS: An original electronic survey consisting of 12 multiple choice questions was sent to all the members of the National Spine Surgery Society (497 surveyed). Participants were asked about their type of medical practice, years of experience in the field, society memberships, type of brace they usually prescribed, average hours of daily brace wearing they recommended, and how and when they indicated bracing discontinuation as well as the clinical and/or imaging findings this decision was based on. Exclusion criteria include brace discontinued because of having developed a curve that warranted surgical treatment. RESULTS: Of a total of 497 surgeons, 114 responded the survey (22.9%). 71.9% had more than 5 years of experience in the specialty, and 51% mainly treated pediatric patients. Overall, 95.5% of the surgeons prescribed the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), indicated brace wearing for a mean of 20.6 h daily. Regarding bracing discontinuation, indicated gradual brace weaning, a decision 93.9% based on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the spine and physical examination, considered a Risser ≥ IV and ≥ 24 months post menarche. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide insight in the daily practice of spine surgeons regarding how and when they discontinue bracing in AIS. The decision of bracing discontinuation is based on AP/lateral spinal radiographs and physical examination, Risser ≥ IV, regardless of Tanner stage, and ≥ 24 months post menarche. Gradual weaning is recommended.