RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) treatment and prevention practices among pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) clinicians in the context of current clinical practice guidelines and contemporary evidence. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of PEM clinicians belonging to the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine Survey listserv. Four varying hypothetical clinical scenarios of children with SSTI were posed to respondents; subsequent items assessed SSTI treatment and prevention practices. Provider demographics were collected. RESULTS: Of 160 survey respondents, more than half stated that they would prescribe oral antibiotics for each clinical scenario, particularly for more complex presentations (small uncomplicated abscess, 51.8%; large uncomplicated abscess, 71.5%; recurrent abscess, 83.5%; febrile abscess, 90.3%; P < 0.001). Most commonly selected antibiotics were clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Across scenarios, more than 80% selected a duration of treatment 7 days or more. Of the 121 respondents who prescribe preventive measures, 85.1% recommend hygiene measures; 52.5% would prescribe decolonization with topical antibiotic ointment and 77.5% would recommend antiseptic body washes. Half of the respondents reported that their institution has standard guidance for SSTI management. CONCLUSIONS: Although current evidence supports adjuvant antibiotics for all drained SSTI and decolonization for the index patient and household contacts, PEM clinicians do not consistently adhere to these recommendations. In light of these findings, development and implementation of institutional guidelines are necessary to aid PEM clinicians' point-of-care decision making and improving evidence-based practice.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Abscesso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Pomadas , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the psychosocial effects of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) diagnosis on the households of children with MRSA skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). STUDY DESIGN: We constructed and administered an interview to the primary caregiver within the home of a child with a history of MRSA SSTI. RESULTS: Seventy-six households were enrolled. Survey responses were analyzed and grouped into 4 themes: health behavior changes, disclosure, social interactions, and knowledge/awareness. The most common theme was disclosure; 91% of participants reported sharing their child's MRSA diagnosis with someone outside of the household. Forty-two percent of respondents reported a change in the manner in which household contacts interacted as a result of the index patient's MRSA diagnosis, including isolating the index patient from other children in the household. Many households reported adopting enhanced personal hygiene behaviors and environmental cleaning routines. Thirty-eight percent of participating households reported altering how they interact with people outside of their home, largely to avoid spreading MRSA to vulnerable individuals. In addition, many participants perceived that others regarded them with caution, especially at daycare, whereas other affected households were excluded from family gatherings. CONCLUSION: Primary caregivers of children with MRSA SSTI reported changing their health behaviors, altering their interactions with people outside of their home, and feeling isolated by others in response to their child's MRSA diagnosis. The findings of our study highlight a need for community interventions and education to prevent the negative psychosocial repercussions associated with MRSA.
Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Relações Interpessoais , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Comportamento Social , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/psicologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Cuidadores/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/transmissão , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/transmissãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Although colonization traditionally is considered a risk factor for Staphylococcus aureus infection, the relationship between contemporary S aureus colonization and infection is not well characterized. We aimed to relate the presence of colonizing and disease-causing strains of S aureus within individuals and households. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study of 163 pediatric outpatients (cases) with community-associated S aureus skin and soft tissue infections in St Louis, infection isolates were obtained from cases and colonization cultures were obtained from cases and their household contacts (n = 562). Molecular typing by repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction was used to compare infecting and colonizing isolates within each case. The infecting strain from each case was compared with S aureus strains colonizing household contacts. The colonization status of cases was followed for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 27 distinct strain types were identified among the 1299 S aureus isolates evaluated. Between 1 and 6 distinct strain types were detected per household. A total of 110 cases (67%) were colonized at 1 or more body sites with the infecting strain. Of the 53 cases with an infecting strain that did not match a colonizing strain, 15 (28%) had 1 or more household contacts with a colonizing strain that matched the infecting strain. Intrafamilial strain-relatedness was observed in 105 families (64%). CONCLUSION: One-third of cases were colonized with a different strain type than the strain causing the skin and soft tissue infection. Fewer than one-third of cases with discordant infecting and colonizing isolates could be linked to the strain from another household contact, suggesting acquisition from sources outside the household.