RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent head and neck cancer. Few studies have analyzed the expression of proteins related to inflammation (COX-2) and tumor progression according to the histological grade of OSCC. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the immunohistochemical expression of COX-2, Ki-67 (cell proliferation), Bcl-2/Bax (apoptosis), VEGF, and CD105 (angiogenesis) according to histological grades of OSCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The immunohistochemical expression of COX-2, Ki-67, Bcl-2, Bax, VEGF, and CD105 of 58 cases of OSCC was analyzed. 13 cases of oral mucosa (OM) were analyzed as controls. RESULTS: COX-2, VEGF, CD105, and Ki-67 were higher in OSCC than in OM, particularly in poorly differentiated OSCC (p<0.05). Bax expression was lower in poorly differentiated OSCC (p<0.001). The Bcl-2/Bax ratio was higher in OSCC compared to MO (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There are immunohistochemical differences according to histological grades of OSCC, which could influence clinical behavior.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Bucais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Humanos , Proteína X Associada a bcl-2 , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2 , Antígeno Ki-67 , Neoplasias Bucais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio VascularRESUMO
Small fibres in the skin are vulnerable to damage in metabolic or toxic conditions such as diabetes mellitus or chemotherapy resulting in small fibre neuropathy and associated neuropathic pain. Whether injury to the most distal portion of sensory small fibres due to a primary dermatological disorder can cause neuropathic pain is still unclear. Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare condition in which mutations of proteins of the dermo-epidermal junction lead to cycles of blistering followed by regeneration of the skin. Damage is exclusive to the skin and mucous membranes, with no known direct compromise of the nervous system. It is increasingly recognized that most RDEB patients experience daily pain, the aetiology of which is unclear but may include inflammation (in the wounds), musculoskeletal (due to atrophy and retraction scars limiting movement) or neuropathic pain. In this study we investigated the incidence of neuropathic pain and examined the presence of nerve dysfunction in RDEB patients. Around three quarters of patients presented with pain of neuropathic characteristics, which had a length-dependent distribution. Quantitative sensory testing of the foot revealed striking impairments in thermal detection thresholds combined with an increased mechanical pain sensitivity and wind up ratio (temporal summation of noxious mechanical stimuli). Nerve conduction studies showed normal large fibre sensory and motor nerve conduction; however, skin biopsy showed a significant decrease in intraepidermal nerve fibre density. Autonomic nervous system testing revealed no abnormalities in heart rate and blood pressure variability however the sympathetic skin response of the foot was impaired and sweat gland innervation was reduced. We conclude that chronic cutaneous injury can lead to injury and dysfunction of the most distal part of small sensory fibres in a length-dependent distribution resulting in disabling neuropathic pain. These findings also support the use of neuropathic pain screening tools in these patients and treatment algorithms designed to target neuropathic pain.
Assuntos
Epidermólise Bolhosa Distrófica/fisiopatologia , Hiperalgesia/fisiopatologia , Neuralgia/etiologia , Neuropatia de Pequenas Fibras/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Chile/epidemiologia , Epidermólise Bolhosa Distrófica/complicações , Epidermólise Bolhosa Distrófica/patologia , Feminino , Resposta Galvânica da Pele/fisiologia , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/complicações , Incidência , Masculino , Fibras Nervosas/patologia , Fibras Nervosas/fisiologia , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Neuralgia/complicações , Neuralgia/epidemiologia , Limiar Sensorial , Pele/patologia , Pele/fisiopatologia , Neuropatia de Pequenas Fibras/complicações , Neuropatia de Pequenas Fibras/patologia , Manobra de Valsalva/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Introduction: The specific diagnosis of influenza A infection makes it possible to control its spread, decreases the unnecessary use of antibiotics, clinical procedures and laboratory test, and allows early recognition of outbreaks. Different technologies are currently available in Chile for this purpose. Objective: The study presented here compares the sensitivity for influenza A virus detection of immunocromatography (RIDT), direct fluorescent antibodies-DFA and DFA with cytocentrifugation against the gold standard, RT-PCR. Material and Methods: In 175 nasal swab samples influenza A RIDT and RT-PCR were performed. Another 1689 nasal swab samples were tested by DFA and RT-PCR for influenza A. Finally, 29 nasal swab samples confirmed as Influenza A positive by RT-PCR were tested by DFA with cytocentrifugation. Results: The RIDT, DFA and DFA + cytocentrifugation sensitivity was 47,3%, 57,2% and 72,4%, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion: Their lower cost and faster turnaround time when compared to PCR make RIDT and DFA the tests of choice in diagnostic laboratories in Chile. However, their low sensitivity and NPV, especially during low season, makes more sensitive diagnostic tools necessary to confirm the results. In our study cytocentrifugation increased DFA sensitivity from 57% to 72%.
Introducción: El diagnóstico específico de influenza permite controlar la diseminación de la enfermedad, disminuir el uso de antimicrobianos, procedimientos clínicos y exámenes, e identificar rápidamente brotes. Diferentes tecnologías están actualmente disponibles en Chile para este propósito. Objetivo: Comparar la sensibilidad diagnóstica para la infección por el virus influenza A de las técnicas inmunocromatografía, inmunofluorescencia directa-IFD e IFD con citocentrifugado contra el estándar de oro, RPC-TR. Materiales y Método: En 175 muestras de hisopado nasofaríngeo se realizó inmunocromatografía y RPC-TR para influenza A. Otras 1.689 muestras de hisopado nasofaríngeo fueron procesadas mediante IFD y RPC-TR para influenza A. Finalmente, en 29 muestras de hisopado nasofaríngeo, confirmadas positivas para influenza A mediante RPC-TR, se realizó IFD con citocentrifugado. Resultados: La sensibilidad de la inmunocromatografía, IFD e IFD + citocentrifugado fue de 47,3%, 57,2% y 72,4%, respectivamente. Discusión y Conclusión: El menor costo y tiempo de respuesta de las técnicas rápidas (inmunocomatografía e IFD) en relación a la RPC-TR hacen que se mantengan como exámenes de rutina en los laboratorios diagnósticos del país. Sin embargo, su baja sensibilidad y VPN, especialmente durante períodos de baja prevalencia, obligaría a confirmar los resultados negativos con técnicas más sensibles. En nuestra comparación la citocentrifugación mejoró la sensibilidad de la IFD de 57% a 72%.
Assuntos
Humanos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo/métodos , Cromatografia de Afinidade , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The specific diagnosis of influenza A infection makes it possible to control its spread, decreases the unnecessary use of antibiotics, clinical procedures and laboratory test, and allows early recognition of outbreaks. Different technologies are currently available in Chile for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: The study presented here compares the sensitivity for influenza A virus detection of immunocromatography (RIDT), direct fluorescent antibodies-DFA and DFA with cytocentrifugation against the gold standard, RT-PCR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 175 nasal swab samples influenza A RIDT and RT-PCR were performed. Another 1689 nasal swab samples were tested by DFA and RT-PCR for influenza A. Finally, 29 nasal swab samples confirmed as Influenza A positive by RT-PCR were tested by DFA with cytocentrifugation. RESULTS: The RIDT, DFA and DFA + cytocentrifugation sensitivity was 47,3%, 57,2% and 72,4%, respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Their lower cost and faster turnaround time when compared to PCR make RIDT and DFA the tests of choice in diagnostic laboratories in Chile. However, their low sensitivity and NPV, especially during low season, makes more sensitive diagnostic tools necessary to confirm the results. In our study cytocentrifugation increased DFA sensitivity from 57% to 72%.