RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with parents who plan to vaccinate their children against influenza next year, especially those who did not vaccinate against influenza last year using a global survey. STUDY DESIGN: A survey of caregivers accompanying their children aged 1-19 years old in 17 pediatric emergency departments in 6 countries at the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Anonymous online survey included caregiver and child demographic information, vaccination history and future intentions, and concern about the child and caregiver having COVID-19 at the time of emergency department visit. RESULTS: Of 2422 surveys, 1314 (54.2%) caregivers stated they plan to vaccinate their child against influenza next year, an increase of 15.8% from the previous year. Of 1459 caregivers who did not vaccinate their children last year, 418 (28.6%) plan to do so next year. Factors predicting willingness to change and vaccinate included child's up-to-date vaccination status (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.32, P = .003); caregivers' influenza vaccine history (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.41-4.40, P < .010), and level of concern their child had COVID-19 (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in risk perception due to COVID-19, and previous vaccination, may serve to influence decision-making among caregivers regarding influenza vaccination in the coming season. To promote influenza vaccination among children, public health programs can leverage this information.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Adolescente , Cuidadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tomada de Decisões , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Pais , Saúde Pública , Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively validate the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), developed on a cohort of children with abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis, in unselected children with abdominal pain who present to the emergency department. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 19-month period, we prospectively recruited children 1 to 17 years old who came to our tertiary pediatric emergency department, with a chief complaint of abdominal pain of duration less than 7 days. PAS components included fever >38 degrees C, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, cough/percussion/hopping tenderness (2 points), right-lower-quadrant tenderness (2 points), migration of pain, leukocytosis >10 000 cells/mm(3), and polymorphonuclear neutrophilia > 7500 cells/mm(3). A follow-up call was made to verify final outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PAS with respect to diagnosis of appendicitis were calculated. RESULTS: We collected data on 849 children. 123 (14.5%) had pathologic study-proven appendicitis. Mean (median, range) score for children with appendicitis and without appendicitis was 7.0 (7, 2-10) and 1.9 (1, 0-9), respectively. If a cutoff PAS of
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Apendicite/complicações , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of concurrent use of conventional medications and natural health products (NHP) and their potential interactions in children arriving at an emergency department. STUDY DESIGN: A survey of parents and patients 0 to 18 years at a large pediatric ED in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: A total of 1804 families were interviewed in this study. Concurrent drug-NHP use was documented in 355 (20%) of patients and 269 (15%) of NHP users were receiving more than one NHP simultaneously. Theoretically possible NHP-drug or NHP-NHP interactions in the preceding 3 months were identified in 285 (16%) children. There were 35 different NHP-medication interaction pairs and 41 NHP-NHP interaction pairs. NHP-medication interactions were predominantly pharmacokinetic (modified absorption, 35%); potential NHP-NHP interactions were mostly pharmacodynamic (increased risk of bleeding, 47%). CONCLUSIONS: Medications are used concurrently with NHP in every fifth pediatric patient in the emergency department and many NHP users are receiving more than 1 NHP simultaneously. One quarter of all paired medication-NHP or NHP-NHP could potentially cause interactions. Although we can not confirm that these were true interactions resulting in clinical symptoms, parents and health care providers need to balance the potential benefit of concurrent NHP-medication use with its potential harms.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Interações Medicamentosas , Interações Ervas-Drogas , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Fitoterapia , Adolescente , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tratamento Farmacológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Fitoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitaminas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Internet could be used to facilitate personal delivery of culture results to care givers after patient discharge from the pediatric emergency department. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited families of children who had cultures taken and were discharged home from our tertiary pediatric emergency department. Parents were given a unique ID and password to retrieve information on culture results from the study web-site. Results were posted and an e-mail was sent to the family. Access pattern to the web-site was recorded, and follow-up calls at 5 and 10 days after posting were made. RESULTS: A total of 527 families were approached; 224 were excluded. Of 303 cultures available, 24 (8%) were positive and 5 (2%) were considered to be contaminants. 186 (61%) parents accessed the Internet-system after mean 94 hours (range 1 minute to 611 hours) after posting. Of the 243 (80%) families reached for follow-up, 66 (27%) "had no time" to enter the website. CONCLUSIONS: This web-based follow-up system is valuable for negative cultures but access by parents is delayed for positive cultures. Future effort to increase awareness regarding importance of obtaining culture results is needed.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Coleta de Dados , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Ontário , PaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical dehydration scale for use in children <3 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of children between 1 and 36 months of age who presented to a tertiary pediatric emergency department (ED) with gastroenteritis. Children were weighed and scored for 12 clinical signs, were rehydrated, and then were reweighed and rescored when rehydration was completed. Weight change from pre- to post-rehydration was used to assess criterion validity with independent global assessments of dehydration severity by attending physicians and nurses as measures of construct validity. Formal approaches to item selection and reduction, reliability, discriminatory power, validity, and responsiveness were used. RESULTS: 137 children (median age: 18 months) with gastroenteritis were studied. The final dehydration scale consisted of four clinical characteristics: general appearance, eyes, mucous membranes, and tears. The measurement properties were as follows: validity as assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.36 to 0.57; reliability as assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.77; discriminatory power as assessed by Ferguson's delta was 0.83; and responsiveness to change as assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test was significant at P <.01. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and researchers may consider this four-item, 8-point rating scale, developed using formal measurement methodology, as an alternative to scales developed ad hoc.