RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in outcomes in patients who achieved or did not achieve the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. METHODS: Patients from the LUpus in MInorities, NAture versus nurture (LUMINA) cohort were included. For these analyses, we compared those patients who achieved the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria any time during follow-up to those who did not. The predefined outcomes were the last Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SDI) scores and survival. Univariable and multivariable negative binomial regression models were performed; adjustment models were based on a forward selection process. RESULTS: In total, 98 of 640 patients never achieved the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria. There was no difference in mean baseline SDI score among the patients who did not achieve the criteria compared to those who did. Conversely, the mean ± SD SDI score at last visit was lower for those who never achieved the criteria (1.2 ± 1.7 versus 2.0 ± 2.3, P = 0.0004). In the final adjusted model, the SDI score at last visit was 31% lower for those who never achieved the criteria (P = 0.0077). These patients were also more likely to survive, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, patients who did not achieve the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria accrued less damage, suggesting that these criteria could allow us to identify a subset of patients with more severe disease than allowed by previous criteria.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Reumatologia , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/etnologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/terapia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) criteria in terms of earlier patients' classification in comparison to the 1982/1997 ACR or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from a Latin America, multiethnic, multicentre cohort, where SLE was defined using the physicians' diagnosis, were included. To calculate the sensitivity of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria, the 1982/1997 ACR criteria were considered the gold standard. Additionally, comparison of the 1982/1997 ACR criteria and the 2012 SLICC criteria with the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria was performed. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria when compared with the 1982/1997 ACR criteria as the gold standard was 91.3%. This new set of criteria allowed an earlier SLE patient classification in 7.4% (mean 0.67 years) and 0.6% (mean 1.47 years) than the 1982/1997 ACR and the 2012 SLICC criteria, respectively. Patients accruing the 2019 EULAR/ACR earlier than the 1982/1997 ACR criteria were more likely to have high anti-dsDNA titres; those accruing them later were less likely to have mucocutaneous and joint manifestations; this was not observed when comparing them with the 2012 SLICC criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria classified earlier only a small proportion of Latin America patients than with the two other criteria sets in real-life clinical practice scenarios. Further studies in different patient populations are needed before these new criteria are adopted worldwide.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/classificação , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Reumatologia/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , América Latina , Masculino , Reumatologia/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare patient and physician (MD) assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2016 and December 2017 at 2 Peruvian hospitals. One group assessed disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) and the other one using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-4), before and after their MD's visit. MDs assessed it with the Mexican Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity (Mex-SLEDAI) (0-32) and with the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI) for damage. Health-related quality of life was ascertained with the LupusQoL. Visual analog scale and NRS were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the correlation between disease activity as assessed by the patient and the Mex-SLEDAI, SDI, and LupusQoL with the Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS: Two hundred forty patients were included; mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 34.9 (12.9) years; most patients were Mestizo. Disease duration was 10.1 (7.0) years. The Mex-SLEDAI was 1.9 (2.7) and the SDI 1.2 (1.5). Disease activity as assessed by the patient, either by VAS or NRS, did not correlate with the Mex-SLEDAI or the SDI. In contrast, patient assessment of disease activity, by VAS or NRS, significantly correlated with several components of the LupusQoL (physical health, pain, planning, emotional health, and fatigue). CONCLUSIONS: Physician's and patient's assessments of disease activity are discrepant; overall, patients score higher than their MDs. Patients score how they perceive the disease is affecting them, rather than disease activity per se. The VAS could be more useful than the NRS as a measurement of disease activity.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Médicos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/diagnóstico , México/epidemiologia , Percepção , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE(S): To test if acute kidney injury (AKI) is preventable in patients in the neonatal intensive care unit and if infants at high-risk of nephrotoxic medication-induced AKI can be identified using a systematic surveillance program previously used in the pediatric non-intensive care unit setting. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement project that occurred between March 2015 and September 2017 in a single center, level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Infants were screened for high-risk nephrotoxic medication exposure (≥3 nephrotoxic medication within 24 hours or ≥4 calendar days of an intravenous [IV] aminoglycoside). If infants met criteria, a daily serum creatinine (SCr) was obtained until 2 days after end of exposure or end of AKI, whichever occurred last. The study was divided into 3 eras: pre-Nephrotoxic Injury Negated by Just-in-time Action (NINJA), initiation, and sustainability. Differences for 5 metrics across 3 eras were compared: SCr surveillance, high nephrotoxic medication exposure rate (per 1000 patient-days), AKI rate (per 1000 patient-days), nephrotoxin-AKI percentage, and AKI intensity (number of AKI days per 100 susceptible patient-days). RESULTS: Comparing the initiation with sustainability era, there was a reduction in high nephrotoxic medication exposures from 16.4 to 9.6 per 1000 patient-days (P = .03), reduction in percentage of nephrotoxic medication-AKI from 30.9% to 11.0% (P < .001), and reduction in AKI intensity from 9.1 to 2.9 per 100 susceptible patient-days (P < .001) while maintaining a high SCr surveillance rate. This prevented 100 AKI episodes during the 18-month sustainability era. CONCLUSION(S): A systematic surveillance program to identify high-risk infants can prevent nephrotoxic-induced AKI and has the potential to prevent short and long-term consequences of AKI in critically ill infants.