RESUMO
Abstract Introduction Spinal infusions of either fentanyl or sufentanil have been reported in international reports, articles, and scientific events worldwide. This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events. Methods MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane library databases), gray literature, hand-searching, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials with no language, data, or status restrictions were included, comparing the effectiveness and safety of adding spinal lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics (LAs). Data were pooled using the random-effects models or fixed-effect models based on heterogeneity. Results The initial search retrieved 4469 records; 3241 records were eligible, and 3152 articles were excluded after reading titles and abstracts, with a high agreement rate (98.6%). After reading the full texts, 76 articles remained. Spinal fentanyl and sufentanil significantly reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption, increased analgesia and pruritus. Fentanyl, but not sufentanil, significantly reduced both postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative shivering; compared to LAs alone. The analyzed studies did not report any case of in-hospital mortality related to spinal lipophilic opioids. The rate of respiratory depression was 0.7% and 0.8% when spinal fentanyl or sufentanil was added and when it was not, respectively. Episodes of respiratory depression were rare, uneventful, occurred intraoperatively, and were easily manageable. Conclusion There is moderate to high quality certainty that there is evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of adding lipophilic opioids to LAs in spinal anesthesia.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Sufentanil/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Spinal infusions of either fentanyl or sufentanil have been reported in international reports, articles, and scientific events worldwide. This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events. METHODS: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane library databases), gray literature, hand-searching, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials with no language, data, or status restrictions were included, comparing the effectiveness and safety of adding spinal lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics (LAs). Data were pooled using the random-effects models or fixed-effect models based on heterogeneity. RESULTS: The initial search retrieved 4469 records; 3241 records were eligible, and 3152 articles were excluded after reading titles and abstracts, with a high agreement rate (98.6%). After reading the full texts, 76 articles remained. Spinal fentanyl and sufentanil significantly reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption, increased analgesia and pruritus. Fentanyl, but not sufentanil, significantly reduced both postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative shivering; compared to LAs alone. The analyzed studies did not report any case of in-hospital mortality related to spinal lipophilic opioids. The rate of respiratory depression was 0.7% and 0.8% when spinal fentanyl or sufentanil was added and when it was not, respectively. Episodes of respiratory depression were rare, uneventful, occurred intraoperatively, and were easily manageable. CONCLUSION: There is moderate to high quality certainty that there is evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of adding lipophilic opioids to LAs in spinal anesthesia.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Fentanila , Humanos , Fentanila/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sufentanil/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-OperatóriaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been associated with a decrease in postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in patients submitted to general anesthesia, whether inhalation or total intravenous anesthesia. Consequently, the DEX effects on postoperative agitation and delirium in patients submitted to general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery have been investigated. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and double-blind clinical trials (RCTs) was undertaken assessing adults submitted to elective procedures under general anesthesia receiving DEX or placebo. The search included articles published in English in the Pubmed and Web of Science databases using keywords such as dexmedetomidine, delirium, and agitation. Duplicate publications, studies involving cardiac surgery or using active control (other than saline solution) were included. A random effects model was adopted using the DerSimonian-Laird method and estimate of Odds Ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables, and weighted mean difference for continuous variables, with their respective 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of the 484 articles identified, 15 were selected comprising 2,183 patients (1,079 and 1,104 patients in the DEX and control group, respectively). The administration of DEX was considered a protective factor for postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction (OR=0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.57 and p<0.001), regardless of the anesthesia technique used. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine administration reduced by at least 43% the likelihood of postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in adult patients submitted to general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Dexmedetomidina , Adulto , Anestesia Geral , Cognição , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, defined as a body temperature <36.0°C, is a common outcome of anesthesia that can cause serious consequences to patients. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of inadvertent hypothermia among surgical procedures from two referral centers in Brazil and to identify sociodemographic, clinical, or surgery-related predictors of hypothermia. This is a cross-sectional study, conducted at two public hospitals in Brasília, Brazil. After the exclusion of 109 patients, 312 subjects (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] physical status I-III) were enrolled from July 2016 through July 2018. The main outcome measures were the prevalence of hypothermia and its predictors. The mean age of the 312 patients was 43.2 (18.2) years (range 18-85 years), and 186 (59.6%) were female. The prevalence of inadvertent hypothermia was 56.7%. Predictors of hypothermia were perioperative chills (p = 0.026), patient's body temperature on arrival in the operating room (p < 0.001), diabetes (p < 0.001), ASA status III (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), general anesthesia (p < 0.001), medical specialty (p < 0.001), fentanyl-based anesthesia (p = 0.002), and surgery time (p < 0.001). The multivariable model prediction model for hypothermia showed fairly good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic: 79.0%, 95% confidence interval 68.0 to 80.1). Approximately 6 in 10 patients undergoing surgery developed inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. The risk of hypothermia is influenced by a myriad of factors that can be used in simple and low-cost predictive models with adequate discriminatory power.