RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This metanalysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of biliary stenting along with radiofrequency ablation compared with stents alone to treat malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) due to extrahepatic biliary strictures secondary to cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and metastatic cancer. METHODS: A systemic search of major databases through April 2022 was done. All original studies were included comparing radiofrequency ablation with stenting versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures. The primary outcomes of interest were the difference in the mean stent patency and overall survival (OS) days between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was to compare the adverse events of the 2 groups. The mean difference in the stent patency and OS days was pooled by using a random-effect model. We calculated the odds ratio to compare the adverse events between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies with 1339 patients were identified. The pooled weighted mean difference in stent patency was 43.50 days (95% CI, 25.60-61.41), favoring the RFA plus stenting. Moreover, the pooled weighted mean difference in OS was 90.53 days (95% CI, 49.00-132.07), showing improved survival in the RFA group. Our analysis showed no statistically significant difference in adverse events between the 2 groups OR 1.13 (95% CI, 0.90-1.42). CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that RFA, along with stent, is safe and is associated with improved stent patency and overall patient survival in malignant biliary strictures. More robust prospective studies should assess this association further.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Sistema Biliar , Ablação por Cateter , Colestase , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Colestase/etiologia , Colestase/cirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/complicações , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a widespread chronic liver disease. It is considered a multifactorial disorder that can progress to liver fibrosis and cause a worldwide public health concern. Coffee consumption may have a protective impact on NAFLD and liver fibrosis. However, the evidence from the previous studies is inconsistent. This meta-analysis summarizes available literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study comprises two meta-analyses. The first meta-analysis summarizes the effect of coffee consumption on NAFLD in those who did or did not drink coffee. The second analysis compares the risk of liver fibrosis development between NAFLD patients who did or did not drink coffee. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) of observational studies were estimated. RESULTS: Of the total collected 321 articles, 11 met our eligibility criteria to be included in the analysis. The risk of NAFLD among those who drank coffee compared to those who did not was significantly lower with a pooled RR value of 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98). Moreover, we also found a significantly reduced risk of liver fibrosis in those who drink coffee than those who did not drink in the NAFLD patients with the relative risk (RR) of 0.68 (95% CI 0.68-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Regular coffee consumption is significantly associated with a reduced risk of NAFLD. It is also significantly associated with decreased risk of liver fibrosis development in already diagnosed NAFLD patients. Although coffee consumption may be considered an essential preventive measure for NAFLD, this subject needs further epidemiological studies.