Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsy Res ; 108(6): 1026-31, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24836846

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pharmacology frequently fails for the treatment of epilepsy. Although surgical techniques are effective, these procedures are highly invasive. We describe feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive mapping and ablation for the treatment of epilepsy. METHODS: Mapping and radiofrequency ablations were performed via the venous system in eleven baboons and three dogs. RESULTS: Mapping in deep cerebral areas was obtained in all animals. High-frequency pacing was able to induce seizure activity of local cerebral tissue in 72% of our attempts. Cerebral activity could be seen during mapping. Ablative lesions were deployed at deep brain sites without steam pops or sudden impedance rise. Histologic analysis showed necrosis at the sites of ablation in all primates. CONCLUSION: Navigation through the cerebral venous system to map seizure activity is feasible. Radiofrequency energy can be delivered transvenously or transcortically to successfully ablate cortical tissue in this animal model using this innovative approach.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Córtex Cerebral/cirurgia , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Animais , Mapeamento Encefálico , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Córtex Cerebral/irrigação sanguínea , Córtex Cerebral/patologia , Córtex Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Cães , Epilepsia/patologia , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Campos Magnéticos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/instrumentação , Papio
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 5(1): 64-71, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22230152

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the 1-year safety and efficacy of Cypher Select or Cypher Select Plus (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with the treatment of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in nonselected, real-world patients. BACKGROUND: There is paucity of consistent data on DES for the treatment of ISR, especially, DES ISR. METHODS: The e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) registry is a Web-based, multicenter and international registry encompassing virtually all subsets of patients and lesions treated with at least 1 SES during the period from 2006 to 2008. We enrolled in this pre-specified subanalysis all patients with at least 1 clinically relevant BMS or DES ISR treated with SES. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis rate at 1 year. RESULTS: Of 15,147 patients enrolled, 1,590 (10.5%) presented at least 1 ISR (BMS group, n = 1,235, DES group, n = 355). Patients with DES ISR had higher incidence of diabetes (39.4% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.001), renal insufficiency (5.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.003), and prior coronary artery bypass graft (20.5% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001). At 1 year, death (1.4% for BMS vs. 2.1% for DES, p = 0.3) and myocardial infarction (2.4% for BMS and 3.3% for DES, p = 0.3) rates were similar, whereas ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization and definite/probable late stent thrombosis were higher in patients with DES ISR (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.003, and 1.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Use of SES for either BMS or DES ISR treatment is safe and associated with low target lesion revascularization recurrence and no apparent safety concern.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Stents Farmacológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Reestenose Coronária/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Sistema de Registros , Estatística como Assunto
3.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 4(9): 982-91, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21939938

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the worldwide practice of Cypher Select (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey) or Cypher Select Plus sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients 80 years of age (octogenarian) and to identify clinical outcomes in this patient population. BACKGROUND: The use of drug-eluting stents in elderly patients may have different features compared with younger patients. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 15,147 patients from 320 hospitals in 56 countries were enrolled in a registry. Initial implantation and follow-up outcome information obtained at 1-year follow-up in 675 octogenarian patients were compared with those in 14,472 nonoctogenarian patients. RESULTS: Octogenarians had significantly more comorbidities and had higher Charlson comorbidity index scores (1.5 ± 1.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). Rates of cardiac death (3.3% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (2.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.021), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (2.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.0002), and major bleeding (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in octogenarians at 1 year; however, there was no significant difference in the rate of target lesion revascularization between the 2 groups (3.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.12). In octogenarians, a high Charlson comorbidity index was an independent predictor of death and stent thrombosis up to 360 days from the index procedure (hazard ratio: 1.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 1.5, p < 0.001, and hazard ratio: 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 1.8, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Stenting with SES may be an effective therapeutic option in elderly patients, with acceptable rates of complications and a very low rate of repeat revascularization as demonstrated by this e-SELECT (A Multi-Center Post-Market Surveillance Registry) subgroup analysis.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Stents Farmacológicos , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Austrália , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Internet , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , América do Norte , Seleção de Pacientes , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , República da Coreia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , América do Sul , Trombose/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA