RESUMO
PURPOSE: Postoperative pain remains an important limiting factor to the selection of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). There is a consensus in neurology pain research that pain should be evaluated as a multidimensional concept, which differs from current practice in ophthalmology. The purpose of this paper was to validate the use of multidimensional questionnaires, such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), to provide an improved analysis of pain after PRK and to better describe its temporal profile. METHODS: This prospective study included 43 eyes of 43 myopic patients who underwent unilateral PRK. After surgery, usual pain treatment was administered. All of the participants responded to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the BPI and the MPQ 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. The internal consistency was evaluated, different postoperative periods were compared, and convergent validity was assessed using correlation testing. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha test showed high internal consistency for each of the questionnaire subscales. Patients reported higher postoperative pain values at the first measurement of the VAS (4.93 ± 2.38), MPQ-pain rating index (26.95 ± 10.58), BPI-pain severity index (14.53 ± 7.36), and BPI-pain interference index (22.30 ± 15.13). Almost all of the scales and subscales showed a statistically significant direct correlation with the VAS at all of the evaluation periods. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the utility of multidimensional questionnaires to expand the assessment of the PRK postoperative pain profile, including intensity and other qualitative aspects.
Assuntos
Dor Ocular/diagnóstico , Lasers de Excimer/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Ceratectomia Fotorrefrativa , Adulto , Dor Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Miopia/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The corneal cross-linking has been used in order to reduce and stabilize the progression of ectatic diseases through its effects on the biomechanics of the cornea. Different protocols are being conducted worldwide to expand its indications as well as its use at different ages, different stages of the disease, combinations with other techniques, besides the utilization for non-ectatic diseases. There is still no consensus on the indications of the cross-linking procedure, but the results published in the literature show significant changes in the properties of the corneal tissue. The aim of this study is to review some of these protocols already published and discuss their results, indications and complications.
O cross-linking corneano é utilizado com o objetivo de reduzir e estabilizar a progressão das patologias ectásicas através de seus efeitos na biomecânica da córnea. Diferentes protocolos estão sendo realizados pelo mundo para expandir suas indicações, assim como seu uso em diversas faixas etárias, diferentes estágios da doença, combinações com outras técnicas, além de utilizações para doenças não ectásicas. Não há ainda um consenso nas indicações do procedimento de cross-linking, mas os resultados publicados na literatura evidenciam mudanças significativas nas propriedades do tecido corneano. O objetivo desse estudo é revisar alguns desses protocolos já publicados e discutir seus resultados, indicações e complicações.