Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Microbiol ; 11(1): 201-8, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793311

RESUMO

The El Niño event of 1997/1998 provided an opportunity to carry out a field experiment in which the relationship of sea surface temperature and the association of Vibrio cholerae with marine plankton could be assessed in Mexican coastal and estuarine areas. Plankton samples were collected from May 1997 through June 1999. Sites included the Mexican ports of Veracruz, Coatzacoalcos and Frontera in the Gulf of Mexico and Ensenada, Guaymas, Mazatlán, Manzanillo, Acapulco and Oaxaca in the Pacific Ocean. Sampling was also accomplished during two oceanographic cruises in the Yucatan channel of the Caribbean Sea. Bacteriological analyses for V. cholerae serogroups O1 and O139 were carried out. Also, the taxonomic structure of the plankton populations was determined. Vibrio cholerae O1 was detected only in Veracruz samples collected during April, May and June 1999, when La Niña climatic conditions prevailed. It is concluded that V. cholerae O1 in Mexico derives from its marine and estuarine origin and not from sewage contamination. The significant number of Acartia tonsa copepodites and V. cholerae copepodite-positive samples suggests a significant role of this copepod in the occurrence and distribution of V. cholerae in coastal areas of Mexico.


Assuntos
Plâncton/microbiologia , Água do Mar/microbiologia , Vibrio cholerae O139/isolamento & purificação , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Copépodes/microbiologia , México
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 62(4): 513-7, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11220769

RESUMO

After a century of absence, in late January 1991, Vibrio cholerae invaded the Western Hemisphere by way of Peru. Although a number of theories have been proposed, it is still not understood how that invasion took place. We reviewed the clinical records of persons attending hospital emergency departments in the major coastal cities of Peru from September through January of 1989/1990 and 1990/1991. We identified seven adults suffering from severe, watery diarrhea compatible with a clinical diagnosis of cholera during the four months preceding the cholera outbreak, but none during the previous year. The patients were scattered among five coastal cities along a 1,000 km coastline. We postulate that cholera vibrios, autochthonous to the aquatic environment, were present in multiple coastal locations, and resulted from environmental conditions that existed during an El Nino phenomenon. Once introduced into the coastal communities in concentrations large enough for human infection to occur, cholera spread by the well-known means of contaminated water and food.


Assuntos
Cólera/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Cólera/transmissão , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/transmissão , Humanos , Peru/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Água do Mar/microbiologia , Vibrio cholerae/fisiologia
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 33(11): 2935-9, 1995 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8576349

RESUMO

We report on the development and testing of two monoclonal antibody-based rapid immunodiagnostic test kits, BengalScreen, a coagglutination test, and Bengal DFA, a direct fluorescent-antibody test, for direct detection of Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal in clinical and environmental specimens. The BengalScreen test requires less than 5 min to complete and can be used in the field. Bengal DFA, being more sensitive than BengalScreen, requires only one reagent and less than 20 min for detection and enumeration of V. cholerae O139 synonym Bengal. In tests for specificity, all 40 strains of V. cholerae O139 reacted with both test kits, whereas 157 strains of heterologous species examined did not, yielding 100% specificity in this study. A field trial was conducted in with both BengalScreen and Bengal DFA, and the results were compared with those obtained by conventional culture methods. BengalScreen demonstrated a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. Results obtained by Bengal DFA, on the other hand, were 100% sensitive and 100% specific and yielded 100% positive and negative predictive values compared with culture methods. In a second evaluation, 93 stool specimens from Mexico that were negative for V. cholerae O139 by culture were also tested with both the BengalScreen and Bengal DFA kits. None of the 93 specimens were positive for V. cholerae O139 by both tests. A concentration method was optimized for screening of environmental water samples for V. cholerae O139 synonym Bengal with rapid test kits. BengalScreen results were unequivocally positive when water samples contained at least 2.0 x 10(3) CFU/ml, whereas Bengal DFA demonstrated an unequivocally positive reaction when the water sample contained at least 1.5 x 10(2) CFU/ml. When Bengal DFA was compared with conventional culture methods for enumeration of V. cholerae O139 synonym Bengal organisms, no difference was observed.


Assuntos
Testes de Aglutinação/métodos , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo/métodos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Vibrio cholerae/isolamento & purificação , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Cólera/diagnóstico , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Testes Imunológicos , Índia/epidemiologia , México/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Especificidade da Espécie , Fatores de Tempo , Microbiologia da Água
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 32(1): 249-52, 1994 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8126193

RESUMO

We report on the development and testing of a novel, rapid, colorimetric immunodiagnostic kit, Cholera SMART, for direct detection of the presence of Vibrio cholerae O1 in clinical specimens. Unlike conventional culture methods requiring several days to complete, the Cholera SMART kit can be used directly in the field by untrained or minimally skilled personnel to detect V. cholerae O1 in less than 15 min, without cumbersome laboratory equipment. A total of 120 clinical and environmental bacterial strains, including both O1 and non-O1 serotypes of V. cholerae isolated from samples collected from a variety of geographical regions, were tested, and positive reactions were observed only with V. cholerae O1. Also, results of a field trial in Bangladesh, employing Cholera SMART, showed 100% specificity and 96% sensitivity compared with conventional culture methods. Another field trial, in Mexico, showed that Cholera SMART was 100% in agreement with a recently described coagglutination test when 108 stool specimens were tested.


Assuntos
Cólera/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio/métodos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Cólera/classificação , Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/imunologia , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sorotipagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA