RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Interim spacer exchange may be performed in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection. Several studies have demonstrated that interim spacer exchange is associated with poor outcomes. This study investigated the survivorship and risk factors for failure in patients with an interim spacer exchange. METHODS: Two institutional databases identified 182 patients who underwent spacer exchange from 2000 to 2017. Primary outcomes included progression to reimplantation, treatment success, and mortality. Bivariate analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors associated with failure. Kaplan-Meier curves using host and local grades were generated to evaluate for primary outcomes and differences in survivorship. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 49% in patients with a spacer exchange. Most patients (60%) failed before 2 years. Higher comorbidity scores, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and non-White race were more prevalent in patients who failed. Negative cultures at the time of exchange were more prevalent in patients who did not fail. Failure rate was higher in immunocompromised conditions, and those who had revision prior to exchange. After considering clinically relevant variables, advanced host grade C was the single factor associated with treatment failure. Although survivorship curves were not significantly different between extremity local grades, higher host grades were associated with treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Almost 1 out of 2 patients with spacer exchange were found to fail the intended 2-stage revision arthroplasty. Benefits of delivering additional antibiotic load with a new spacer should be balanced against poor outcomes in patients with the aforementioned risk factors.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mortality after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been thoroughly explored. Short and long-term mortality appear to be correlated with patient comorbidities. Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) is a commonly performed test that reflects the variation in red blood cell size. This study investigated the utility of RDW, when combined with comorbidity indices, in predicting mortality after TJA. METHODS: Using a single institutional database, 30,437 primary TJA were identified. Patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pre-operative hemoglobin, RDW, and Charlson Comorbidity Index(CCI)) were queried. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality after TJA. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <12g/dL for women and <13 g/dL for men. The normal range for RDW is 11.5-14.5%. A preliminary analysis assessed the bivariate association between demographics, preoperative anemia, RDW, CCI, and all-cause mortality within 1-year after TJA. A multivariate regression model was conducted to determine independent predictors of 1-year mortality. Finally, ROC curves were used to compare AUC of RDW, CCI and the combination of both in predicting 1-year mortality. RESULTS: The mean RDW was 13.6% ± 1.2. Eighteen percent of patients had pre-operative anemia. The mean CCI was 0.4 ± 0.9. RDW, anemia, CCI, and age were significantly associated with a higher incidence of 1-year mortality. RDW, CCI, age, and male sex were found to be independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. RDW (AUC = 0.68) was a better predictor of mortality compared to CCI (AUC = 0.66). The combination of RDW and CCI (AUC = 0.76) predicted 1-year mortality more accurately than CCI or RDW alone. CONCLUSION: RDW appears to be a useful parameter that, when combined with CCI, can predict the risk for 1-year mortality after TJA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia , Índices de Eritrócitos , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that lower socioeconomic status may result in adverse outcomes following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of defining socioeconomic status, however, continues to be debated. The purpose of this study is to determine which socioeconomic variables are associated with poor outcomes following THA and TKA. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 2770 primary THA and TKA patients from 2015 to 2018. Utilizing census data based upon the patient's ZIP code, we extracted poverty, unemployment, high school graduation, and vehicle possession rates. We collected demographics, comorbidities, discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, and postoperative functional outcome scores for each patient. We then performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify the effect of each socioeconomic variable on postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Patients from areas with high unemployment (P = .008) and low high school graduation rates (P = .019) had a higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index. High poverty levels, high unemployment, lower high school graduation rate, and lower vehicle possession rates did not have a significant effect on functional outcomes (all P > .05). In the multivariate analysis, no socioeconomic variable demonstrated an increased rate of rehabilitation discharge, revision, or readmission (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing THA and TKA from areas with high unemployment and lower educational levels do have more medical comorbidities. However, none of the 4 socioeconomic variables studied are independently associated with higher rates of readmission, discharge to rehabilitation, or worse functional outcomes. Patients from disadvantaged areas should not be denied access to arthroplasty care based on socioeconomic status alone.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The process of infection and multiple procedure-related factors in 2-stage exchange arthroplasty may lead to severe bone loss that can complicate subsequent reimplantation. The primary purpose of this study is to quantitatively characterize the extent of bone loss on the femoral and acetabular side prior to reimplantation during 2-stage revision hip arthroplasty for infection. METHODS: This retrospective case series includes 47 patients with planned 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of infected total hip replacement. Demographic, clinical, and surgical information, and complications during the 2-stage process were collected on all patients. The radiographs of all patients were reviewed prior to first-stage explantation and post-reimplantation or latest follow-up to characterize bone loss using the Paprosky classification systems. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with planned 2-stage exchange, 10 patients (21%) were not reimplanted. Following explant and spacer placement, 32 patients (68%) experienced progressive femoral bone loss, and 20 (43%) experienced progressive acetabular bone loss. Patients who experienced progression of both femoral and acetabular bone (14, 30%) had a longer time between resection and reimplantation (164 ± 128 vs 88 ± 26 days, P = .03). A reimplantation time of greater than 90 days was associated with an increased risk of combined bone loss progression (15% vs 53%, P = .01). For patients who underwent reimplantation (79%), increased bone loss led to high rates of diaphyseal femoral fixation (97%) and revision acetabular components (38%). CONCLUSION: Increased time to reimplantation in 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip infections is associated with a high rate of acetabular and femoral bone loss, and increased complexity of reimplantation.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Prótese de Quadril , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur/cirurgia , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Reoperação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models, minorities who use more postacute care resources may face difficulties with access to quality total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) care. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in perioperative complications and functional outcomes between African American and Caucasian patients undergoing THA and TKA. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of all primary THA and TKA patients at our institution from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, 90-day complications, readmissions, Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Hip disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were compared between African American and Caucasian patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 5284 patients included in the study, 1041 were African American (24.5%). Although African American patients had lower preoperative HOOS/KOOS (33.5 vs 45.1, P < .001) and mental VR-12 scores (37.8 vs 51.5, P < .001) compared with Caucasian patients, there was no clinical difference at 1 year in HOOS/KOOS (50.2 vs 50.4), mental VR-12 (55.0 vs 52.6), or physical VR-12 scores (39.5 vs 39.8). When controlling for demographics and medical comorbidities, African American race was associated with increased rehabilitation facility discharge (odds ratio, 1.69; P < .001) but no difference in readmissions or complications. CONCLUSION: Although African American patients had lower preoperative functional scores, they made improved postoperative gains when compared with Caucasian patients. Although there was no difference in postoperative complications, further studies should assess social causes for the increase in rehabilitation utilization rates in minority patients.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Quadril , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Quadril/cirurgia , População BrancaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Concerns exist that minorities who utilize more resources in an episode-of-care following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) may face difficulties with access to quality arthroplasty care in bundled payment programs. The purpose of this study is to determine if African American patients undergoing TKA or THA have higher episode-of-care costs compared to Caucasian patients. METHODS: We queried Medicare claims data for a consecutive series of 7310 primary TKA and THA patients at our institution from 2015 to 2018. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities, readmissions, and 90-day episode-of-care costs between African American and Caucasian patients. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the independent effect of race on episode-of-care costs. RESULTS: Compared to Caucasians, African Americans were younger, but had higher rates of pulmonary disease and diabetes. African American patients had increased rates of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (20% vs 13%, P < .001), with higher subacute rehabilitation ($1909 vs $1284, P < .001), home health ($819 vs $698, P = .022), post-acute care ($5656 vs $4961, P = .008), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($19,457 vs $18,694, P = .001). When controlling for confounding comorbidities, African American race was associated with higher episode-of-care costs of $440 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: African American patients have increased episode-of-care costs following THA and TKA when compared to Caucasian patients, mainly due to increased rates of home health and rehabilitation utilization. Further study is needed to identify social variables that can help reduce post-acute care resources and prevent reduction in access to arthroplasty care in bundled payment models.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Humanos , Medicare , Readmissão do Paciente , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unexpected cancelation of scheduled total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures creates patient distress and disruption for the clinical team. The purpose of this study is to identify the etiology and fate of cancelations for scheduled TJAs. METHODS: A consecutive series of 11,670 patients at a single institution from 2013 to 2017 was reviewed in March 2020. All patients who were scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty and subsequently canceled were identified. The etiology of cancelation and time to rescheduling were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 505 (4.3%) canceled patients, 209 (42%) were due to medical reasons. Three hundred ninety-one patients (77%) eventually underwent their procedure at a mean delay of 165 days (19-1908). Only 53 (25%) patients canceled for a medical reason underwent further diagnostic or therapeutic intervention for their medical condition. When compared to patient-driven cancelations, those canceled for medical reasons had a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.82 vs 0.39, P < .001), were canceled closer to the scheduled surgery date (8.55 vs 18.1 days, P < .001), and were more likely to eventually undergo surgery (86% vs 73%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Canceled elective TJA surgeries are most often due to a medical concern, however only a minority of these patients undergo intervention for that medical condition. To minimize the risk of cancelation, healthcare providers may consider early referral of medically complex patients to the patient's primary care physician. After cancelation, patients should have a clearly defined path to return to the operative schedule to prevent further delays.