RESUMO
PURPOSE: Less than half of the patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo comprehensive molecular testing. We designed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based "nudge intervention" to prompt plasma-based molecular testing at the time of initial medical oncology consultation. METHODS: A nonrandomized prospective trial was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania's academic practice and two affiliated community practices. Molecular genotyping was performed by tissue- and/or plasma-based next generation sequencing methods. Comprehensive testing was defined as testing for EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, KRAS, and NTRK. Guideline-concordant treatment was defined as the use of the appropriate first-line (1L) therapy as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Proportion of patients with comprehensive molecular genotyping results available at any time, molecular results available before 1L therapy, and guideline-concordant 1L treatment were compared between the preintervention and postintervention cohorts using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, 376 in the preintervention cohort and 157 in the postintervention cohort. After implementation of the EMR-based nudge, a higher proportion of patients underwent comprehensive molecular testing in the postintervention versus the preintervention cohort (100% v 88%, P = <.001), had results of comprehensive molecular testing available before initiating 1L treatment (97.3% v 91.6%, P = .026), and received NCCN guideline-concordant care (89.8% v 78.2%, P = .035). CONCLUSION: Across three practice sites in a large health system, implementation of a provider team-focused EMR-based nudge intervention was feasible, and led to a higher number of patients with NSCLC undergoing comprehensive molecular genotyping. These findings demonstrate that behavioral nudges can promote molecular testing and should be studied further as a tool to improve guideline-concordant care in both community and academic sites.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Genótipo , Mutação/genética , Reflexo/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend molecular genotyping for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic nonsquamous (mNSq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The association between availability of molecular genotyping before first line (1L) therapy and overall survival (OS) is not known. METHODS: We conducted a real-world cohort study using electronic health records in patients newly diagnosed with mNSq NSCLC. Cox proportional-hazards multivariable regression models were constructed to examine the association between OS and test result availability before 1L therapy, adjusting for covariates. Additional analyses were conducted to assess the consistency and strength of the relationship. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between concurrent tissue and plasma testing (v tissue alone) and result availability. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were included, 80% (261/326) with results available before 1L (available testing group), and 20% (65/326) without results available (unavailable testing group). With 14.2-month median follow-up, patients in the available testing group had significantly longer OS relative to the unavailable testing group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.62; P < .0001). The adjusted odds of availability of results before 1L therapy was higher with concurrent tissue and plasma testing (v tissue testing alone; adjusted odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.90; P = .026). CONCLUSION: Among patients with mNSq NSCLC in a real-world cohort, availability of molecular genotyping results before 1L therapy was associated with significantly better OS. Concurrent tissue and plasma testing was associated with a higher odds of availability of results before 1L therapy. These findings warrant renewed attention to the completion of molecular genotyping before 1L therapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Genótipo , Modelos de Riscos ProporcionaisRESUMO
Although the majority of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) lacking a detectable targetable mutation will receive pembrolizumab-based therapy in the frontline setting, predicting which patients will experience a durable clinical benefit (DCB) remains challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mNSCLC receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy underwent a 74-gene next-generation sequencing panel on blood samples obtained at baseline and at 9 weeks. The change in circulating tumor DNA levels on-therapy (molecular response) was quantified using a ratio calculation with response defined by a > 50% decrease in mean variant allele fraction. Patient response was assessed using RECIST 1.1; DCB was defined as complete or partial response or stable disease that lasted > 6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were recorded. RESULTS: Among 67 patients, 51 (76.1%) had > 1 variant detected at a variant allele fraction > 0.3% and thus were eligible for calculation of molecular response from paired baseline and 9-week samples. Molecular response values were significantly lower in patients with an objective radiologic response (log mean 1.25% v 27.7%, P < .001). Patients achieving a DCB had significantly lower molecular response values compared to patients with no durable benefit (log mean 3.5% v 49.4%, P < .001). Molecular responders had significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.64) compared with molecular nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Molecular response assessment using circulating tumor DNA may serve as a noninvasive, on-therapy predictor of response to pembrolizumab-based therapy in addition to standard of care imaging in mNSCLC. This strategy requires validation in independent prospective studies.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , DNA Tumoral Circulante/sangue , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and untreated brain metastases (BM) have been excluded from most trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Real-world evidence on efficacy and survival outcomes of ICIs in patients with BM is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without BM using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. We also characterized systemic and intracranial objective response rate (ORR) and treatment details, including timing of cranial irradiation. RESULTS: Between Augutst 2013 and December 2018, 570 patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy were analyzed. Of 126 (22.1%) patients with BM, 96 (76.2%) had treated BM (local therapy prior to pembrolizumab), and 30 (23.8%) had untreated BM. Of patients with untreated BM, 17 (56.7%) underwent radiation within 30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. In the remaining 13 (43.3%) treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy alone, intracranial ORR was 36.4%. Patients with and without BM did not have significantly different systemic ORR (27.8% vs. 29.7%; P = .671), PFS (mPFS 9.2 vs. 7.7 months; P = .609), or OS (mOS 18.0 vs. 18.7 months; P = .966). Factors associated with improved survival on Cox analysis included female gender, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and first-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BM did not have inferior survival to patients without BM after treatment with pembrolizumab-based therapy. In the current era, BM may not automatically confer inferior survival, and should not exclude patients from receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/mortalidade , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/patologia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Non-small-cell lung cancer is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide, and these patients have traditionally had a grim prognosis. As our understanding of actionable molecular aberrations that drive oncogenesis has grown, so too has the number of available therapies with improved outcomes in selectively targeted patient populations. This review provides an overview of the clinical response of tumors harboring relatively rare oncogenic drivers to currently approved targeted agents and those in late-stage clinical development. Molecular testing methods available for screening for oncogenic drivers will be discussed.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/antagonistas & inibidores , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Mutação , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , PrognósticoRESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a devastating impact around the world. With high rates of transmission and no curative therapies or vaccine yet available, the current cornerstone of management focuses on prevention by social distancing. This includes decreased health care contact for patients. Patients with lung cancer are a particularly vulnerable population, where the risk of mortality from cancer must now be balanced by the potential risk of a life-threatening infection. In these unprecedented times, a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach is required to streamline but not compromise care. We have developed guidelines at our academic cancer center to standardize management of patients with lung cancer across our health care system and provide guidance to the larger oncology community. We recommend that general principles of lung cancer treatment continue to be followed in most cases where delays could result in rapid cancer progression. We recognize that our recommendations may change over time based on clinical resources and the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. In principle, however, treatment paradigms must continue to be individualized, with careful consideration of risks and benefits of continuing or altering lung cancer-directed therapy.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/virologia , Oncologia/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
PURPOSE: The STK11 gene encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase that regulates cell polarity and functions as a tumor suppressor. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and STK11 mutations often have other co-mutations. We evaluated the impact of KRAS and TP53 co-mutations on outcomes after first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC that harbors STK11 mutations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with metastatic NSCLC and STK11 mutations treated at the University of Pennsylvania. STK11 mutations were identified through next-generation sequencing (NGS) in tissue or plasma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the relationship between STK11 co-mutations and survival outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From February 2013 to December 2016, samples from 1,385 patients with NSCLC were analyzed by NGS; of these, 77 patients (6%) harbored an STK11 mutation (n = 56, tissue; n = 21, plasma). Of the 62 patients included, 18 had an STK11 mutation alone, 19 had STK11/KRAS, 18 had STK11/TP53, and seven had STK11/KRAS/TP53. Patients with STK11/KRAS co-mutations had a worse median PFS (2.4 months) compared with STK11 alone (5.1 months; log-rank P = .048), STK11/TP53 (4.3 months; log-rank P = .043), and STK11/KRAS/ TP53 (13 months; log-rank P = .03). Patients with STK11/KRAS co-mutation experienced shorter median OS (7.1 months) compared with STK11 alone (16.1 months; log-rank P < .001), STK11/TP53 (28.3 months; log-rank P < .001), and STK11/KRAS/TP53 (22 months; log-rank P = .025). CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced NSCLC and STK11 mutations treated with first-line systemic therapy, co-mutation with KRAS was associated with significantly worse PFS and OS. By contrast, co-mutation of STK11 with TP53 conferred a better prognosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is an established component of the nonoperative management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the standard dose of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks is associated with clinically significant toxicity. Interest in a more tolerable regimen has led to the widespread use of weekly lower dose cisplatin, but few randomized trials have compared these approaches. METHODS: We examined outcomes of patients with stage III-IVb HNSCC treated with definitive intent chemoradiotherapy using either high-dose cisplatin (HDC) or low-dose cisplatin (LDC), using population-based Veterans Affairs data. In an intent-to-treat analysis, patients were assigned to the HDC vs LDC group according to the dose of their first cycle. Variables potentially influencing treatment decisions including cancer site, stage, smoking/alcohol use, and comorbidities were used to generate propensity scores (PS) for the use of HDC. We compared overall survival (OS) by treatment group using Cox regression, adjusting for PS. We then determined the risk of toxicities using PS-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2901 patients were included in the analysis; 2200 received HDC (mean initial dose 100 mg/m2). The mean initial dose of LDC was 40 mg/m2. After PS adjustment, HDC was not associated with improved OS over LDC (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.80 to 1.04). Adjusting for PS, HDC was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury, neutropenia, dehydration/electrolyte disturbance, and hearing loss. CONCLUSION: In this large, population-based study of US military veterans, LDC was associated with similar survival to HDC in the nonoperative definitive management of locally advanced HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and hypopharynx/larynx. HDC was associated with statistically significantly more toxicity than LDC. Adoption of LDC may reduce toxicity burden while maintaining OS.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Radiossensibilizantes/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Intervalos de Confiança , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Radiossensibilizantes/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , VeteranosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cost can be a major issue in therapeutic decision-making, and in particular for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). METHODS: The specific aim of this analysis was to evaluate the costs and outcomes of patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-10, Medicare Part A and Part B costs from all for patients treated from 1991 to 1996 on RTOG 94-10, a phase III trial showing a survival benefit for concurrent chemoradiation (STD RT) over sequential (RT day 50) chemoradiation in LA-NSCLC with intermediate outcome for concurrent twice daily radiation and chemotherapy (HFX RT). 26-month expected costs for each arm of the trial in 1996 dollars were determined, with Kaplan Meier sampling average estimates of survival probabilities for each month and mean monthly costs. The analysis was performed from a payer's perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated comparing RT on day 50 and HFX RT to the STD RT. RESULTS: Of the 610 patients entered, Medicare cost data and clinical outcomes were available for 92 patients. In this subset, compared to STD RT, RT on day 50 proved less costly but resulted in reduced survival at 1 year. In addition, HFX RT cost slightly more than STD RT but was less effective in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Medicare insurance and with significant toxicity burden, RT on day 50 is the least expensive but also least effective treatment in this subset of patients treated on RTOG 94-10.