Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chemotherapy ; 57(4): 285-91, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21778716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Contamination of central catheters is frequent, and biofilm perpetuates infections. Heparin does not protect against infections because it has no antibiotic action. Minocycline and edetic acid (M-EDTA), a potent calcium chelating agent that destroys bacterial and fungal cell membrane and disrupts biofilm, may be an alternative to allow the associated antibiotic to act locally at a high and safe concentration. METHODS: Fifty children with cancer and a port-a-cath were followed up: 26 received heparin (group 1) and 24 M-EDTA (group 2). A total of 762 serial prospective blood cultures were obtained, 387 from group 1 and 375 from group 2. RESULTS: In group 1 (heparin), 19 blood cultures were positive, and infection incidence was 73.1% (19/26 ports). In group 2 (M-EDTA), 5 blood cultures were positive, and the incidence rate was 20.8% (5/24 ports). CONCLUSION: M-EDTA, compared with heparin, prevents and treats catheter infections, and is a promising alternative to decrease sepsis during chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Biofilmes , Sangue/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Cateteres de Demora , Criança , Feminino , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Minociclina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA