RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in hospital admission and diagnostic evaluation for febrile seizure by race and ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study among children 6 months to 6 years with simple or complex febrile seizure between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, using data from the Pediatric Health Information System. The primary outcome was hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of encounters with neuroimaging or lumbar puncture. We used mixed-effects logistic regression model with random intercept for hospital and patient to estimate the association between outcomes and race and ethnicity after adjusting for covariates, including seizure type. RESULTS: In total, 94â884 encounters were included. Most encounters occurred among children of non-Hispanic White (37.0%), Black (23.9%), and Hispanic/Latino (24.6%) race and ethnicity. Black and Hispanic/Latino children had 29% (aOR 0.71; 95% CI 0.66-0.75) and 26% (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.69-0.80) lower odds of hospital admission compared with non-Hispanic White children, respectively. Black and Hispanic/Latino children had 21% (aOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.86) and 22% (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71-0.85) lower adjusted odds of neuroimaging compared with non-Hispanic White children. For complex febrile seizure, the adjusted odds of lumbar puncture was significantly greater among Asian children (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.19-3.77) compared with non-Hispanic White children. There were no racial differences in the odds of lumbar puncture for simple febrile seizure. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-Hispanic White children, Black and Hispanic/Latino children with febrile seizures are less likely to be hospitalized or receive neuroimaging.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Convulsões Febris , Humanos , Convulsões Febris/diagnóstico , Convulsões Febris/etnologia , Feminino , Masculino , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Lactente , Criança , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Neuroimagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Punção Espinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) severity score among children with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections and HUS by stratifying them according to their risk of adverse events. The score has not been previously evaluated in a North American acute care setting. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records of children <18 years old infected with STEC and treated in 1 of 38 participating emergency departments in North America between 2011 and 2015. The HUS severity score (hemoglobin [g/dL] plus 2-times serum creatinine [mg/dL]) was calculated using first available laboratory results. Children with scores >13 were designated as high-risk. We assessed score performance to predict severe adverse events (ie, dialysis, neurologic complication, respiratory failure, and death) using discrimination and net benefit (ie, threshold probability), with subgroup analyses by age and day-of-illness. RESULTS: A total of 167 children had HUS, of whom 92.8% (155/167) had relevant data to calculate the score; 60.6% (94/155) experienced a severe adverse event. Discrimination was acceptable overall (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and better among children <5 years old (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87). For children <5 years, greatest net benefit was achieved for a threshold probability >26%. CONCLUSIONS: The HUS severity score was able to discriminate between high- and low-risk children <5 years old with STEC-associated HUS at a statistically acceptable level; however, it did not appear to provide clinical benefit at a meaningful risk threshold.